GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce MX330

CORE STATE GP108B
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1594 MHz
TDP 10 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Pascal
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
N/A
geekbench_opencl
20,255
7,896
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
9,019
passmark_directx_10
19
N/A
passmark_directx_11
52
N/A
passmark_directx_12
25
N/A
passmark_directx_9
65
N/A
passmark_g2d
890
N/A
passmark_g3d
5,310
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
2,840
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Visual performance comparisons between the AMD Radeon 760M and GeForce NVIDIA GeForce MX330 indicate a definite winner. the AMD Radeon 760M achieves significantly stronger FPS in current games. This graphics memory superiority and engineering advances lead into clearly enhanced visual experiences. Test figures demonstrates this assessment. Players looking for maximum visuals will factor this in.

When it comes to ray tracing, the AMD Radeon 760M moves significantly forward of GeForce NVIDIA GeForce MX330. The RT cores execute heavy global illumination rendering considerably more efficiently. Users seeking premium fidelity should seriously favor the AMD Radeon 760M. This hardware RT advantage is considerable. Current releases continually leverage ray tracing effects.

In-game tests throughout different resolutions consistently favor the AMD Radeon 760M. From esports genres to demanding games, the AMD Radeon 760M maintains its advantage. This performance dependability over different games indicates fundamental engineering benefits. Enthusiasts will expect strong experiences regardless of scenario. This flexibility is outstanding.

For users facing a buying choice, the AMD Radeon 760M stands as the advised choice. Its dependable gaming superiority over GeForce NVIDIA GeForce MX330 positions it the smarter purchase for performance-oriented buyers. Consider your specific needs, but this benchmarks leads toward the AMD Radeon 760M. Make an informed determination. This performance delta is tangible and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
MX330
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
384 -25.0%
Shaders
512
384 -25.0%
TMUs
32
24 -25.0%
ROPs
16
16 0.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
3
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
1594 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1752 MHz 7 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
56.06 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
48 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
512 KB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
25.50 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
1,224.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
38.26 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)
19.13 GFLOPS (1:64)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
Power
TDP
15 W
10 W
TDP (W)
15
10 -33.3%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Pascal
GPU Name
Phoenix
GP108B
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
GeForce MX (3xx)
Process Size
4 nm
14 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
1,800 million
Die Size
178 mm²
74 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
142.6M / mm²
24.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
6.1
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x4
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
View Radeon 760M Details View GeForce MX330 Details