NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 represent two distinct eras of NVIDIA graphics hardware, separated by six years of architectural evolution. The GTX 560 Ti, built on the Fermi 2.0 architecture with a 40 nm process, was a mainstream gaming card from 2011, while the Quadro P4000, based on Pascal and fabricated on a 16 nm node, arrived in 2017 as a professional workstation solution. The benchmark data reveals a decisive performance gap, with the Quadro P4000 delivering a Geekbench OpenCL score of 36,212 compared to the GTX 560 Ti's 10,690, a 70.5% difference. However, the GTX 560 Ti holds a higher percentile ranking at 49 versus the Quadro P4000's 47, reflecting the different competitive landscapes each card occupies.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro P4000 scores 36,212, which is 70.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti's 10,690. This is the only head-to-head benchmark available in the data.

Q: How do the two cards compare in terms of manufacturing process?

A: The GTX 560 Ti uses a 40 nm process at TSMC, while the Quadro P4000 uses a significantly more advanced 16 nm process, also from TSMC. This process shrink allows the Quadro P4000 to pack 7,200 million transistors into a smaller 314 mm² die, compared to 1,950 million transistors on a 332 mm² die for the GTX 560 Ti.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The GTX 560 Ti features 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 128.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Quadro P4000 offers 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on the same 256-bit bus width but with nearly double the bandwidth at 243.3 GB/s.

Q: Which card supports newer DirectX versions?

A: The Quadro P4000 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the GTX 560 Ti only supports DirectX 12 (11_0). Additionally, the Quadro P4000 supports Vulkan 1.4, whereas the GTX 560 Ti has no Vulkan support listed.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The GTX 560 Ti has a TDP of 170 W and requires a 450 W power supply with two 6-pin connectors. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient with a 105 W TDP, needing only a 300 W power supply and a single 6-pin connector.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare for each card in the benchmark database?

A: The GTX 560 Ti's closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6600S with an average score of 10,629, a mere 0.6% difference. The Quadro P4000's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 at 9,653, just 0.1% apart.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between Fermi 2.0 and Pascal is substantial. The GTX 560 Ti, based on the GF114 chip, was fabricated on a 40 nm process at TSMC, yielding 1,950 million transistors across a 332 mm² die. The Quadro P4000, using the GP104 chip, was built on a 16 nm process at the same foundry, packing 7,200 million transistors into a slightly smaller 314 mm² die. This process transition enabled a transistor density increase from 5.9 million transistors per square millimeter to 22.9 million, a fundamental shift in integration capability.

The shading unit count reflects this generational leap. The GTX 560 Ti has 384 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The Quadro P4000 more than quadruples the shading units to 1,792, nearly doubles the TMUs to 112, and doubles the ROPs to 64. Neither card features ray tracing cores or tensor cores, as both predate the RTX architecture.

Clock speeds also differ significantly. The GTX 560 Ti's memory runs at 1002 MHz (4 Gbps effective), while the Quadro P4000's memory operates at 1901 MHz (7.6 Gbps effective). The Quadro P4000 also has defined base and boost clocks of 1202 MHz and 1480 MHz respectively, whereas the GTX 560 Ti has no base or boost clock listed.

The compute capabilities show a stark contrast. The GTX 560 Ti delivers 1,263.4 GFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Quadro P4000 achieves 5.304 TFLOPS, over four times higher. The Quadro P4000 also lists FP16 performance at 82.88 GFLOPS (with a 1:64 ratio), while the GTX 560 Ti has no FP16 specification.

The Verdict

The benchmark data makes the performance hierarchy unambiguous. In the single available head-to-head test, Geekbench OpenCL, the Quadro P4000 scores 36,212 versus the GTX 560 Ti's 10,690, a 70.5% advantage. This aligns with the raw compute specifications: the Quadro P4000's 5.304 TFLOPS FP32 performance dwarfs the GTX 560 Ti's 1,263.4 GFLOPS.

However, the percentile rankings tell a more nuanced story. The GTX 560 Ti sits at the 49th percentile among all GPUs, while the Quadro P4000 ranks at the 47th percentile. This suggests that while the Quadro P4000 is absolutely faster, the GTX 560 Ti remains competitive within its own peer group of older hardware, whereas the Quadro P4000 faces stiffer competition from modern cards.

For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, memory capacity, and modern API support, the Quadro P4000 is the clear choice. It offers 8 GB of memory versus 1 GB, supports DirectX 12 (12_1) versus 12 (11_0), includes Vulkan 1.4, and does so at a lower TDP of 105 W compared to 170 W. The GTX 560 Ti, while older and less capable, still holds its own in its percentile bracket, trading blows with rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 6600S (0.6% difference) and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 (-0.7% difference).

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |

| Process Node | 40 nm | 16 nm |

| Transistors | 1,950 million | 7,200 million |

| Die Size | 332 mm² | 314 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 5.9M / mm² | 22.9M / mm² |

| Memory Clock | 1002 MHz (4 Gbps) | 1901 MHz (7.6 Gbps) |

| Memory Size | 1024 MB | 8 GB |

| Memory Bandwidth | 128.3 GB/s | 243.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 384 | 1,792 |

| TMUs | 64 | 112 |

| ROPs | 32 | 64 |

| Pixel Rate | 13.17 GPixel/s | 94.72 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 52.67 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 1,263.4 GFLOPS | 5.304 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | Not listed | 82.88 GFLOPS (1:64) |

| TDP | 170 W | 105 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | Not listed | 1.4 |

| Length | 229 mm (9 inches) | 241 mm (9.5 inches) |

| Height | Not listed | 111 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Release Date | 2011-01-24 | 2017-02-05 |

| Launch MSRP | 249 USD | 815 USD |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The sole direct benchmark comparison in the database is Geekbench OpenCL, where the Quadro P4000 dominates with a score of 36,212 against the GTX 560 Ti's 10,690. The delta percentage of -70.5% indicates that the GTX 560 Ti achieves only about 30% of the Quadro P4000's OpenCL performance. This is consistent with the massive disparities in shading units (384 versus 1,792), texture rate (52.67 GTexel/s versus 165.8 GTexel/s), and pixel rate (13.17 GPixel/s versus 94.72 GPixel/s).

The Quadro P4000's other benchmark results provide additional context. It scores 11,466 in Passmark G3D, 4,913 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 786 in Passmark G2D. Its DirectX-specific Passmark scores show 181 for DirectX 9, 86 for DirectX 11, 66 for DirectX 10, and 40 for DirectX 12. In newer API tests, it achieves 41,786 in Geekbench Vulkan and 1,115 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The GTX 560 Ti has no comparable benchmark entries in these categories, limiting direct comparisons to the OpenCL result.

The nearest rival data reinforces the performance tier each card inhabits. The GTX 560 Ti's closest competitors include the AMD Radeon RX 6600S (10,629, +0.6%), NVIDIA Quadro K2200 (10,761, -0.7%), AMD Radeon R9 M275X (10,582, +1%), and AMD Radeon Pro 450 (10,804, -1.1%). The Quadro P4000's rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 (9,653, +0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M (9,645, +0.2%), NVIDIA Quadro K5000 (9,637, +0.3%), and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 (9,716, -0.5%). The GTX 560 Ti's average benchmark score of 10,690 places it in a similar range to its rivals, while the Quadro P4000's average of 9,665 is notably lower than its OpenCL score, suggesting variance across different test workloads.

The data shows that the Quadro P4000's advantages extend beyond raw compute. Its 94.72 GPixel/s pixel rate is over seven times that of the GTX 560 Ti's 13.17 GPixel/s, and its 165.8 GTexel/s texture rate triples the older card's 52.67 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth nearly doubles from 128.3 GB/s to 243.3 GB/s. These differences translate directly to the observed benchmark gap, making the Quadro P4000 the superior choice for compute-intensive workloads, while the GTX 560 Ti remains a historical data point in the evolution of NVIDIA's GPU lineup.