NVIDIA GB10 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The NVIDIA GB10 and Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy very different positions in the database. The GB10 is a server-class Blackwell part with a complete benchmark record, while the LX PRO is a newer, unbenchmarked graphics card with a different architectural approach. The recorded data shows that the GB10 sits at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 117,393 across two tests. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile by default, making direct numerical comparisons impossible for most workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for these two parts. The GB10 has two recorded results: Geekbench OpenCL at 120,137 and Geekbench Vulkan at 114,648. These produce an average score of 117,393. The LX PRO has zero benchmark submissions, so no direct comparison of measured performance can be made from the recorded data.

The GB10’s OpenCL score of 120,137 places it slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, which averages 118,976, a margin of 1.3 percent in favor of the GB10. Against the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, the GB10’s average of 117,393 is 0.3 percent higher than that rival’s 117,088. The gap widens when compared to the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, where the GB10 leads by 2.6 percent, and against the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile, the GB10 is 3 percent ahead.

The LX PRO cannot be placed in this hierarchy because it lacks any benchmark scores. The database shows its average benchmark score as 0, which means no percentile comparison against rivals is possible. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder, not a measurement.

The GB10’s Vulkan score of 114,648 is lower than its OpenCL result by about 4.6 percent, which is common for parts that favor one API over another. No Vulkan or OpenCL data exists for the LX PRO, so the database cannot confirm whether the same pattern would appear.

Where Each One Wins

The GB10 wins in raw compute throughput for FP32 workloads. Its 29.71 TFLOPS FP32 performance exceeds the LX PRO’s 24.58 TFLOPS by roughly 20.9 percent. This advantage comes from a higher boost clock of 2418 MHz compared to the LX PRO’s unspecified clock speeds, combined with identical shading unit counts.

The LX PRO wins in memory bandwidth. Its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is 58.1 percent higher than the GB10’s 273.2 GB/s. This is driven by a 192-bit bus with GDDR6 memory running at 18 Gbps effective, versus the GB10’s 256-bit bus with LPDDR5X at 8.5 Gbps effective. For memory-bound workloads, the LX PRO has a clear edge on paper.

The LX PRO also wins in pixel throughput. Its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is 65.4 percent higher than the GB10’s 116.1 GPixel/s. This comes from having 96 ROPs versus the GB10’s 48 ROPs, despite the GB10’s higher clock speed.

The GB10 wins in texture throughput. Its 928.5 GTexel/s texture rate is 141.8 percent higher than the LX PRO’s 384.0 GTexel/s. The GB10 has 384 TMUs versus the LX PRO’s 192 TMUs, and the higher clock speed amplifies this difference.

For FP16 compute, the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, which is 65.4 percent higher than its own FP32 rate. The GB10 delivers 29.71 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio, meaning no throughput advantage when switching precision. The LX PRO’s FP16 output is 65.4 percent higher than the GB10’s FP16 output.

The GB10 has no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan API support recorded, listing all three as N/A. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. For any graphics application that requires these APIs, the LX PRO is the only functional choice between the two.

Architecture Differences

The GB10 uses the GB20B chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 382 mm². The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is not recorded in the database.

Both parts have 6144 shading units. The similarity ends there. The GB10 has 384 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 48 ray tracing cores, and 384 tensor cores. The LX PRO has 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores or tensor cores are listed in its specifications.

Memory configurations differ significantly. The GB10 uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, yielding 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GB10 has over five times the memory capacity, while the LX PRO has over one and a half times the bandwidth.

The GB10’s boost clock is 2418 MHz with a base clock of 1665 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded. The GB10’s memory clock is 1067 MHz, translating to 8.5 Gbps effective. The LX PRO’s memory clock is 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective.

Power characteristics differ substantially. The GB10 has a thermal design power of 140 W and requires a 300 W suggested power supply. It uses no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics processor with a slot width of IGP. The LX PRO has a thermal design power of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested power supply. It occupies a dual-slot form factor.

The GB10 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The LX PRO uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GB10 has a single HDMI display output. The LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The GB10’s physical dimensions are 150 mm in length, 51 mm in height, and 150 mm in width. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The LX PRO is substantially longer and taller, but thinner.

The GB10’s API support is listed as N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. This makes the LX PRO suitable for conventional graphics workloads, while the GB10 appears oriented toward compute or server tasks that do not rely on these APIs.

The GB10 was released on October 14, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 3,999 USD. The LX PRO was released on March 16, 2026, with no launch MSRP recorded. The GB10 has a predecessor listed as Server Hopper and a successor listed as Server Rubin. The LX PRO has neither a predecessor nor a successor listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 delivers 29.71 TFLOPS FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The GB10 is about 20.9 percent higher.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s bandwidth from 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA GB10 has 273.2 GB/s from 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus. The LX PRO has 58.1 percent higher bandwidth.

Q: Does the GB10 support DirectX?

A: No. The database lists DirectX as N/A for the GB10. The LX PRO supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the power requirement for each GPU?

A: The GB10 has a 140 W TDP and a 300 W suggested power supply, with no power connectors. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested power supply, using a single 16-pin connector.

Q: Which GPU has more texture mapping units?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 has 384 TMUs, which is double the LX PRO’s 192 TMUs. This gives the GB10 a texture rate of 928.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the LX PRO?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark entries for the LX PRO, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. The GB10 has two recorded scores, averaging 117,393.

The Verdict

The data supports different buyers for each part. The NVIDIA GB10 is a server-oriented compute platform with proven benchmark results. Its 95th percentile ranking, average score of 117,393, and 0.3 percent lead over the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation confirm that it performs at a high level among all GPUs. Its 128 GB memory capacity and 29.71 TFLOPS FP32 make it suitable for large compute workloads that fit within its 140 W power envelope. The lack of graphics APIs suggests it is not intended for traditional rendering tasks.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is an unproven quantity in the database. With no benchmark scores, its actual performance cannot be verified. Its strengths are theoretical: 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 compute. Its 24 GB memory capacity is much smaller than the GB10’s 128 GB, but its GDDR6 memory runs at a higher effective speed. The LX PRO supports modern graphics APIs, which the GB10 does not, so it can handle DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan workloads.

For buyers who need validated performance and massive memory capacity in a low-power integrated form factor, the GB10 is the clear choice based on recorded data. For buyers who need a conventional graphics card with display outputs, API support, and high memory bandwidth, the LX PRO is the only option between the two, but its lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance remains unknown. The 3.6 percent price difference cannot be assessed because the LX PRO has no launch MSRP, while the GB10 has a launch MSRP of 3,999 USD.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in nearly every recorded specification except shading unit count.

Process node: The GB10 uses a 5 nm process. The LX PRO uses a 6 nm process.

Chip name: The GB10 uses chip GB20B. The LX PRO uses chip 7G105.

Architecture: The GB10 uses Blackwell 2.0. The LX PRO uses TrueGPU.

Die size: The GB10 measures 382 mm². The LX PRO’s die size is unknown.

Base clock: The GB10 has a 1665 MHz base clock. The LX PRO has no recorded base clock.

Boost clock: The GB10 has a 2418 MHz boost clock. The LX PRO has no recorded boost clock.

Memory clock: The GB10 runs at 1067 MHz, 8.5 Gbps effective. The LX PRO runs at 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective.

Memory size: The GB10 has 128 GB. The LX PRO has 24 GB.

Memory type: The GB10 uses LPDDR5X. The LX PRO uses GDDR6.

Memory bus width: The GB10 has a 256-bit bus. The LX PRO has a 192-bit bus.

Memory bandwidth: The GB10 has 273.2 GB/s. The LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s.

TMUs: The GB10 has 384. The LX PRO has 192.

ROPs: The GB10 has 48. The LX PRO has 96.

Ray tracing cores: The GB10 has 48. The LX PRO has none listed.

Tensor cores: The GB10 has 384. The LX PRO has none listed.

Pixel rate: The GB10 has 116.1 GPixel/s. The LX PRO has 192.0 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: The GB10 has 928.5 GTexel/s. The LX PRO has 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 performance: The GB10 has 29.71 TFLOPS. The LX PRO has 24.58 TFLOPS.

FP16 performance: The GB10 has 29.71 TFLOPS (1:1). The LX PRO has 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: The GB10 is 140 W. The LX PRO is 225 W.

Slot width: The GB10 is IGP. The LX PRO is dual-slot.

Power connectors: The GB10 has none. The LX PRO has one 16-pin connector.

Suggested PSU: The GB10 requires 300 W. The LX PRO requires 550 W.

Bus interface: The GB10 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: The GB10 has one HDMI. The LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a.

DirectX: The GB10 lists N/A. The LX PRO lists 12 Ultimate (12_2).

OpenGL: The GB10 lists N/A. The LX PRO lists 4.6.

Vulkan: The GB10 lists N/A. The LX PRO lists 1.3.

Dimensions: The GB10 is 150 mm long, 51 mm high, and 150 mm wide. The LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide.

Release date: The GB10 is October 14, 2025. The LX PRO is March 16, 2026.

Launch MSRP: The GB10 is 3,999 USD. The LX PRO has none recorded.

Production status: Both are listed as Active.

Benchmark scores: The GB10 has two scores averaging 117,393. The LX PRO has none.

Percentile: The GB10 is at the 95th percentile. The LX PRO is at the 50th percentile.

Nearest rivals: The GB10 has four listed rivals with delta percentages ranging from 0.3 to 3 percent. The LX PRO has none listed.