NVIDIA GB10 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two NVIDIA parts across entirely different workloads. The GB10, a Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation product, posts benchmark scores in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 117,393. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104, a GeForce 40-series product, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in an average benchmark score of zero. This means the GB10 wins every measured compute workload by default, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no wins in any recorded benchmark.

The GB10 sits at the 95th percentile among all GPUs, placing it in the top tier of measured hardware. Its nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (average score 117,088, delta 0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (average score 118,976, delta 1.3% behind), the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (average score 114,395, delta 2.6% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (average score 113,944, delta 3.0% ahead). The RTX 4060 Ti AD104, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with no rivals listed, indicating no comparative data exists for it.

The use-case split is therefore clear: the GB10 is the only one of the two with measured compute performance, and it delivers that performance in both OpenCL (120,137) and Vulkan (114,648) workloads. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no measured compute presence in the database, so any analysis of its wins must remain qualitative based on its specification sheet alone.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different architectural generations. The GB10 uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB20B chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. Its die size is 382 mm², and the transistor count is listed as unknown in the database. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD104 chip, also fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but with a die size of 294 mm² and a recorded transistor count of 35,800 million, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million transistors per mm².

The memory subsystems differ substantially. The GB10 carries 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 carries 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Despite the GB10 having twice the bus width, the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 achieves slightly higher bandwidth due to its faster memory clock (2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective versus 1067 MHz, 8.5 Gbps effective).

The compute resources differ in scale. The GB10 has 6,144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, 48 raster output pipelines, 48 ray tracing cores, and 384 tensor cores. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4,352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, 48 raster output pipelines, 34 ray tracing cores, and 136 tensor cores. The GB10 leads in shading units, texture mapping units, ray tracing cores, and tensor cores, while both match at 48 raster output pipelines.

The clock speeds favor the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. Its base clock is 2310 MHz and boost clock is 2535 MHz, compared to the GB10's base of 1665 MHz and boost of 2418 MHz. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the GB10 lists all three APIs as N/A.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two products. The GB10 has two recorded benchmark scores: Geekbench OpenCL at 120,137 and Geekbench Vulkan at 114,648. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has zero recorded benchmarks, so no direct comparison numbers exist.

However, the GB10's average benchmark score of 117,393 can be compared against its nearest rivals, which gives context for where it stands. It is 0.3% above the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (117,088), 1.3% below the AMD Radeon PRO W7700 (118,976), 2.6% above the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB (114,395), and 3.0% above the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile (113,944). These deltas are narrow, indicating the GB10 performs in a tight cluster with these workstation and server parts.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no comparable data. Its percentile rank of 50 suggests it sits at the median of all GPUs in the database, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot provide a numeric comparison to the GB10. The only measurable head-to-head statement available is that the GB10 has recorded compute scores and the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 does not.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GB10 has an average benchmark score of 117,393, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the GB10 compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

A: The GB10's average score of 117,393 is 0.3% higher than the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's average score of 117,088.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The GB10 uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The GB10 has 6,144 shading units, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4,352 shading units.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: No. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GB10 lists all three APIs as N/A.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The GB10 is listed as Active, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is listed as End-of-life.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The GB10 uses the GB20B chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture. Both use TSMC 5 nm process, but the GB10 has a 382 mm² die size versus 294 mm² for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. The transistor count is unknown for the GB10, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 35,800 million transistors with a density of 121.8M per mm².

Clock speeds differ: the GB10 runs at 1665 MHz base and 2418 MHz boost, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 runs at 2310 MHz base and 2535 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the GB10 uses 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective), while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory capacity differs dramatically: 128 GB LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus for the GB10 versus 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. Bandwidth is close: 273.2 GB/s for the GB10 versus 288.0 GB/s for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104.

Compute unit counts differ: shading units are 6,144 versus 4,352, TMUs are 384 versus 136, ROPs match at 48, RT cores are 48 versus 34, and tensor cores are 384 versus 136. Pixel rate is 116.1 GPixel/s for the GB10 versus 121.7 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. Texture rate is 928.5 GTexel/s versus 344.8 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 are both 29.71 TFLOPS for the GB10 versus 22.06 TFLOPS for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104.

Power and physical specifications differ: TDP is 140 W for the GB10 versus 160 W for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. The GB10 is an IGP with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 300 W, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for the GB10 versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104. Display outputs are 1x HDMI for the GB10 versus 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104.

Dimensions differ: the GB10 measures 150 mm by 51 mm by 150 mm, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 measures 240 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm. Release dates differ: the GB10 launched on 2025-10-14, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 launched on 2024-03-31. The GB10's predecessor is Server Hopper and successor is Server Rubin, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104's predecessor is GeForce 30 and successor is GeForce 50.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split. The GB10 is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark performance, delivering an average score of 117,393 and a 95th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival comparisons show it performing within 3% of established workstation and server parts like the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, the Radeon PRO W7700, the Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, and the RTX A5500 Mobile. This makes it a measured compute performer in the database.

The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile rank, and no rival data. Its specification sheet shows a smaller memory pool (8 GB versus 128 GB), fewer shading units, fewer tensor cores, and fewer RT cores than the GB10. It does, however, have higher clock speeds, slightly higher memory bandwidth, and full API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For compute workloads as measured by the database, the GB10 is the only part with verifiable results. For graphics API support and higher clock speeds, the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has the specification advantage, but no benchmark data confirms its performance. The production status also differs: the GB10 is Active, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is End-of-life. Based strictly on recorded measurements, the GB10 is the proven performer, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 remains unmeasured in the database.