NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The NVIDIA CMP 50HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti are two very different GPUs that share a manufacturer but little else. The CMP 50HX is an end-of-life Turing-based mining part with no display outputs, while the RTX 5070 Ti is an active, Blackwell 2.0-based consumer graphics card. Benchmark data shows the RTX 5070 Ti is dramatically faster, with the CMP 50HX trailing by 73.6% in Geekbench OpenCL and 78.9% in Geekbench Vulkan. A buyer should only consider the CMP 50HX for a niche compute workload where its specific Turing architecture traits are relevant; for any general-purpose, gaming, or display-driven task, the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice based on sheer performance and feature set.
The Verdict
The data is unambiguous: the RTX 5070 Ti wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 against the CMP 50HX’s 56,135, a delta of -73.6% for the older card. The Vulkan gap is even wider, with the RTX 5070 Ti scoring 225,122 versus 47,445, a -78.9% difference. The CMP 50HX holds zero wins in the head-to-head comparison.
The CMP 50HX is for a very specific buyer: someone who needs a Turing GPU with 56 RT cores and 448 tensor cores for a compute task that does not require display output or modern connectivity. Its PCIe 1.0 x4 interface severely limits data transfer, making it unsuitable for most modern workloads. The RTX 5070 Ti, conversely, is for anyone seeking a high-performance, active graphics card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, a 256-bit bus, and 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, paired with 8,960 shading units, make it a far more versatile and capable part for gaming, rendering, and AI tasks. The RTX 5070 Ti also ranks in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, matching the CMP 50HX’s percentile, but it does so with a far higher average benchmark score of 49,957 versus the CMP 50HX’s 51,790 — a narrow 3.7% lead for the mining card in that aggregate metric, which is misleading given the massive per-test deltas.
Architecture Differences
The two cards are built on entirely different architectures. The CMP 50HX uses the TU102 chip on the Turing architecture, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It packs 18,600 million transistors on a 754 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.7M per mm². In contrast, the RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0, built on a 5 nm process at the same foundry. It contains 45,600 million transistors on a much smaller 378 mm² die, achieving a far higher density of 120.6M per mm².
Memory technology differs completely. The CMP 50HX has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, delivering 560.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti offers 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, but with a much higher 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds also diverge: the CMP 50HX runs at a 1350 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti operates at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. The RTX 5070 Ti also has a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, offering 43.94 TFLOPS in both, whereas the CMP 50HX delivers 22.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio against its 11.07 TFLOPS FP32.
Feature sets diverge sharply. The CMP 50HX has no display outputs, a PCIe 1.0 x4 bus interface, and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti includes 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and a single 16-pin power connector. The RTX 5070 Ti also has a higher TDP of 300 W versus 250 W for the CMP 50HX, and a suggested PSU of 700 W versus 600 W. Physical dimensions differ as well: the CMP 50HX is 267 mm long, 116 mm tall, and 35 mm wide, while the RTX 5070 Ti is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.
FAQ
Q: Which card is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the CMP 50HX scores 56,135. The RTX 5070 Ti is 73.6% faster, per the head-to-head delta.
Q: Does the CMP 50HX support display output?
A: No. The CMP 50HX has no display outputs, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti includes 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b connectors.
Q: What is the memory configuration difference?
A: The CMP 50HX has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus with 560.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: How do their transistor densities compare?
A: The CMP 50HX has a transistor density of 24.7M per mm² on a 754 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 Ti achieves 120.6M per mm² on a 378 mm² die.
Q: Which card has more shading units?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, compared to the CMP 50HX’s 3,584. The RTX 5070 Ti also has 280 TMUs and 96 ROPs, versus 192 TMUs and 80 ROPs on the CMP 50HX.
Q: What is the average benchmark score difference?
A: The CMP 50HX has an average benchmark score of 51,790, which is 3.7% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti’s 49,957. This aggregate metric, however, contradicts the individual head-to-head results, where the RTX 5070 Ti dominates.
Specification Differences
The following specifications differ between the two cards:
- Process Node: CMP 50HX is 12 nm; RTX 5070 Ti is 5 nm.
- Transistors: 18,600 million vs. 45,600 million.
- Die Size: 754 mm² vs. 378 mm².
- Transistor Density: 24.7M / mm² vs. 120.6M / mm².
- Base Clock: 1350 MHz vs. 2295 MHz.
- Boost Clock: 1545 MHz vs. 2452 MHz.
- Memory Size: 10 GB vs. 16 GB.
- Memory Type: GDDR6 vs. GDDR7.
- Memory Bus Width: 320 bit vs. 256 bit.
- Memory Bandwidth: 560.0 GB/s vs. 896.0 GB/s.
- Shading Units: 3584 vs. 8960.
- TMUs: 192 vs. 280.
- ROPs: 80 vs. 96.
- RT Cores: 56 vs. 70.
- Tensor Cores: 448 vs. 280.
- Pixel Rate: 123.6 GPixel/s vs. 235.4 GPixel/s.
- Texture Rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs. 686.6 GTexel/s.
- FP32: 11.07 TFLOPS vs. 43.94 TFLOPS.
- FP16: 22.15 TFLOPS (2:1) vs. 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1).
- TDP: 250 W vs. 300 W.
- Power Connectors: 2x 8-pin vs. 1x 16-pin.
- Suggested PSU: 600 W vs. 700 W.
- Bus Interface: PCIe 1.0 x4 vs. PCIe 5.0 x16.
- Display Outputs: No outputs vs. 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.
- Dimensions: 267 mm x 116 mm x 35 mm vs. 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm.
- Production Status: End-of-life vs. Active.
- Release Date: 2021-06-23 vs. 2025-02-19.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head data is sparse but conclusive. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti produces a score of 212,363, dwarfing the CMP 50HX’s 56,135. This represents a -73.6% delta from the RTX 5070 Ti’s perspective, meaning the CMP 50HX delivers less than a quarter of the performance. The Geekbench Vulkan test shows an even larger gap: the RTX 5070 Ti scores 225,122 against the CMP 50HX’s 47,445, a -78.9% delta.
These results align with the architectural differences. The RTX 5070 Ti’s 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is nearly four times the CMP 50HX’s 11.07 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s is more than double the CMP 50HX’s 296.6 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s nearly doubles the older card’s 123.6 GPixel/s. The RTX 5070 Ti’s memory bandwidth advantage of 896.0 GB/s over 560.0 GB/s further cements its lead in bandwidth-sensitive compute tasks. While the CMP 50HX edges out the RTX 5070 Ti in average benchmark score by 3.7% (51,790 vs. 49,957), that aggregate figure is driven by the CMP 50HX’s higher percentile ranking among all GPUs (86th for both), but it does not reflect the direct comparison tests where the RTX 5070 Ti wins decisively. The lone metric where the CMP 50HX shows parity is in its nearest rival comparisons: it sits 1.6% above the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, 3.6% above the RX Vega 64, and 3.7% above the RTX 5070 Ti in average score, while the RTX 5070 Ti sits 0.1% below the RX Vega 64 and 2% below the RX 6900 XT. These rival deltas, however, are based on aggregate averages, not the direct head-to-head tests where the RTX 5070 Ti’s superiority is overwhelming.