GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

CORE STATE Navi 21

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2250 MHz

TDP 300 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

CMP 50HX

CORE STATE TU102

VRAM 10 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1545 MHz

TDP 250 W

BUS WIDTH 320 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

4,079

N/A

geekbench_metal

177,021

N/A

geekbench_opencl

187,673

56,135

geekbench_vulkan

148,525

47,445

passmark_directx_10

167

N/A

passmark_directx_11

279

N/A

passmark_directx_12

113

N/A

passmark_directx_9

268

N/A

passmark_g2d

1,055

N/A

passmark_g3d

26,732

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

14,547

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

Looking at the test numbers for AMD RX 6900 XT graphics card and GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX, an obvious story emerges. AMD RX 6900 XT graphics card steadily produces better frame rates in our benchmarking. This performance advantage ranges from substantial to impressive depending on the specific title. Such dependability attests to fundamental engineering superiority. Consumers prioritizing rendering performance will factor this in.

When those weighing a acquisition determination, AMD RX 6900 XT graphics card emerges as the preferred pick. Its consistent benchmark lead over GeForce NVIDIA CMP 50HX makes it the more logical selection for gaming-focused users. Evaluate your specific use cases, though this data guides toward AMD RX 6900 XT graphics card. Make an wise determination. The frame rate gap is measurable and notable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6900 XT

CMP 50HX

Core Specs

Shading Units

5,120

3,584 -30.0%

Shaders

5,120

3,584 -30.0%

TMUs

320

192 -40.0%

ROPs

128

80 -37.5%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1825 MHz

1350 MHz

Boost Clock

2250 MHz

1545 MHz

Game Clock

2015 MHz

—

Memory Clock

2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB

10 GB

VRAM (MB)

16,384

10,240 -37.5%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

256 bit

320 bit

Bandwidth

512.0 GB/s

560.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

5 MB

L3 Cache

128 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

288.0 GPixel/s

123.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

720.0 GTexel/s

296.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

23.04 TFLOPS

11.07 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,440.0 GFLOPS (1:16)

346.1 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

46.08 TFLOPS (2:1)

22.15 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

56 -30.0%

Tensor Cores

—

448

Power

TDP

300 W

250 W

TDP (W)

300

250 -16.7%

Suggested PSU

700 W

600 W

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Turing

GPU Name

Navi 21

TU102

Generation

Navi II (RX 6000)

Mining GPUs

Process Size

7 nm

12 nm

Transistors

26,800 million

18,600 million

Die Size

520 mm²

754 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

51.5M / mm²

24.7M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

7.5

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Triple-slot

Dual-slot

Length

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

120 mm 4.7 inches

116 mm 4.6 inches

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.12x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

PCIe 1.0 x4

Other

Launch Price

999 USD

—

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi

—

Successor

Navi III

—

View Radeon RX 6900 XT Details View CMP 50HX Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

CMP 50HX

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons