NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The NVIDIA CMP 50HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, yet the aggregate benchmark data places them surprisingly close together. The CMP 50HX, a Turing-based mining card from 2021, holds an average benchmark score of 49071, while the Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4070 Ti SUPER from 2024 averages 48704. The delta between them is a mere 0.8% in favor of the CMP 50HX, according to its nearestRivals data, though the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's own listing shows a -0.7% delta against the CMP 50HX. This statistical near-tie, however, masks a dramatic divergence in workload-specific performance, architectural philosophy, and practical utility.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only two benchmark tests shared by both cards in the data are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, and the results are not close. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 223091 against the CMP 50HX’s 53411, a delta of -76.1% from the CMP 50HX’s perspective. That means the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers over four times the raw compute throughput in this API. The Vulkan results are equally lopsided: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER hits 206035, while the CMP 50HX manages 44731, a -78.3% delta. These are not marginal wins; the Ada card utterly dominates in both compute-oriented tests.

The CMP 50HX wins zero of the two shared benchmarks. Its only statistical solace comes from its slightly higher aggregate average score (49071 vs 48704), which is driven by the fact that it has no other benchmark entries to drag that average down. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average is pulled lower by a Passmark G2D score of 1225 and a Passmark DirectX 9 score of 360, which are not comparable workloads for a mining-focused card. When looking strictly at the shared head-to-head tests, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear victor, holding a 76-78% performance advantage in both OpenCL and Vulkan. The CMP 50HX’s aggregate score, therefore, is an artifact of sparse data rather than evidence of competitive compute capability.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different silicon philosophies. The CMP 50HX uses the TU102 chip on TSMC’s 12 nm process node, packing 18,600 million transistors into a 754 mm² die. Its transistor density is 24.7M per mm². The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on TSMC’s 5 nm node, with 45,900 million transistors in a 379 mm² die, achieving a density of 121.1M per mm². The Ada chip crams 2.5 times more transistors into half the physical space, evidence of the process node advancement.

Clock speeds tell a similar story. The CMP 50HX has a base clock of 1350 MHz and a boost of 1545 MHz, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. The Ada card’s boost clock is 69% higher than the Turing card’s. Memory architecture diverges as well: the CMP 50HX uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus with 560.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The wider bus on the CMP 50HX is offset by the faster GDDR6X memory on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, which delivers 20% more bandwidth.

Shader resources are massively in favor of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. It has 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, versus the CMP 50HX’s 3584 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also has more RT cores (66 vs 56) but fewer tensor cores (264 vs 448). The CMP 50HX’s tensor core count is higher on paper, but its FP16 performance of 22.15 TFLOPS is half of its FP32, indicating a 2:1 ratio, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER achieves 44.10 TFLOPS in both FP16 and FP32 (1:1). The Ada card’s FP32 throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS is four times the CMP 50HX’s 11.07 TFLOPS.

The CMP 50HX has no display outputs, as it was designed exclusively for mining. It connects via PCIe 1.0 x4, a severely restricted interface. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the CMP 50HX’s lack of display outputs makes those APIs moot for real-world use.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher aggregate benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA CMP 50HX holds an average benchmark score of 49071, which is 0.8% higher than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 48704, according to the CMP 50HX’s nearestRivals data. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s own nearestRivals listing shows a -0.7% delta against the CMP 50HX, indicating the difference is within statistical noise.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 223091 in Geekbench OpenCL, compared to the CMP 50HX’s 53411. This represents a 76.1% delta in favor of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, meaning it is over four times faster in this test.

Q: Does the CMP 50HX have any display outputs?

A: No. The CMP 50HX has no display outputs, as it was designed for mining applications. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The CMP 50HX has 560.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 672.3 GB/s from 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, giving the Ada card a 20% bandwidth advantage despite its narrower bus.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a transistor density of 121.1M per mm² on TSMC’s 5 nm node, versus the CMP 50HX’s 24.7M per mm² on TSMC’s 12 nm node. The Ada chip is nearly five times denser.

Q: Are both cards still in production?

A: No. Both the NVIDIA CMP 50HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER are listed as end-of-life products in the data.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on nearly every measurable spec. The CMP 50HX uses the TU102 chip on a 12 nm process, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip on a 5 nm process. Transistor count is 18,600 million for the CMP 50HX versus 45,900 million for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, with die sizes of 754 mm² and 379 mm² respectively. Transistor density is 24.7M per mm² versus 121.1M per mm².

Clock speeds differ substantially: the CMP 50HX runs at 1350 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. Memory configurations are 10 GB GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus for the CMP 50HX, versus 16 GB GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bandwidth is 560.0 GB/s versus 672.3 GB/s.

Shader resources show the Ada card’s dominance: 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, versus 3584 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs for the CMP 50HX. RT cores are 66 vs 56, but tensor cores are 264 vs 448. Pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s versus 123.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 44.10 TFLOPS versus 11.07 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 22.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specs also differ: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and a triple-slot design with 1x 16-pin connector, while the CMP 50HX has a TDP of 250 W and a dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin connectors. Both recommend a 600 W PSU. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is longer (310 mm vs 267 mm), taller (140 mm vs 116 mm), and wider (61 mm vs 35 mm). The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 1.0 x4. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers display outputs; the CMP 50HX has none. Release dates are 2024-01-07 for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 2021-06-23 for the CMP 50HX. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 799 USD; the CMP 50HX has no listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in every compute benchmark shared between the two. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 76.1% higher, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 78.3% higher. It also wins on architectural grounds for any graphics or display workload, given its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and its fourfold FP32 throughput advantage. The Ada card’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for high-resolution texture workloads, and its 44.10 TFLOPS FP16 performance (1:1) is double the CMP 50HX’s 22.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

The CMP 50HX’s only statistical win is its aggregate average benchmark score of 49071, which edges out the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 48704 by 0.8%. That advantage is an artifact of the CMP 50HX having only two benchmark entries, both of which are lower than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s corresponding scores. The CMP 50HX does have a higher tensor core count (448 vs 264) and a wider memory bus (320-bit vs 256-bit), but its lower memory bandwidth and lack of display outputs negate those advantages for any practical purpose. The CMP 50HX’s lower TDP of 250 W (vs 285 W) and smaller physical footprint (267 mm vs 310 mm length) are its only physical wins, but without display outputs, those are meaningless for general users.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior card for any compute or graphics task. It outperforms the CMP 50HX by 76.1% in Geekbench OpenCL and 78.3% in Geekbench Vulkan. Its 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is four times the CMP 50HX’s 11.07 TFLOPS. It has 16 GB of faster GDDR6X memory versus 10 GB of GDDR6, and its 5 nm process node with 121.1M transistors per mm² represents a generational leap over the 12 nm, 24.7M per mm² Turing design.

The CMP 50HX’s higher aggregate benchmark score of 49071 is a statistical artifact driven by its limited benchmark suite, not a reflection of real performance parity. Its 0.8% lead over the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 48704 is within the margin of error, and its nearestRivals data shows the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER actually has a -0.7% delta against it, meaning the two cards are effectively tied on average.

Who should pick which? The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only choice for anyone needing a functional GPU with display outputs, modern API support, and competitive compute performance