GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

CORE STATE Navi 21
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2250 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

CMP 40HX

CORE STATE TU106
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1650 MHz
TDP 185 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,689
N/A
geekbench_metal
181,337
N/A
geekbench_opencl
171,304
93,395
geekbench_vulkan
136,875
77,879
passmark_directx_10
155
N/A
passmark_directx_11
264
N/A
passmark_directx_12
100
N/A
passmark_directx_9
265
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,030
N/A
passmark_g3d
24,980
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
13,245
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

Reviewing the test results for AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card and NVIDIA CMP 40HX from NVIDIA, a clear trend develops. AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card repeatedly produces higher FPS in this testing. This rendering superiority extends from significant to remarkable depending on the individual benchmark. This consistency testifies to underlying technical advantages. Users prioritizing visual capability might pay attention.

NVIDIA CMP 40HX from NVIDIA has difficulty to compete with AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card's raw capability. For value-focused builders, NVIDIA CMP 40HX from NVIDIA might still offer acceptable capability, yet people needing top-tier results would gravitate toward AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card. The performance margin is sufficiently considerable to overlook. Demanding workloads notably reveal this margin. The cost difference provides returns in visual quality.

For real-time ray tracing, AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card leaps further ahead of NVIDIA CMP 40HX from NVIDIA. The dedicated accelerators manage heavy shadow effects more effectively. Players demanding modern fidelity would definitely choose AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card. The RT capability is considerable. Current titles increasingly leverage hardware RT effects.

At the end of the day: AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card claims this matchup decisively. Users wanting gaming power would strongly select AMD RX 6800 XT graphics card over NVIDIA CMP 40HX from NVIDIA. The score data supports this conclusion. The titles might run considerably more fluidly. It's a definite victor in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6800 XT
CMP 40HX
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,608
2,304 -50.0%
Shaders
4,608
2,304 -50.0%
TMUs
288
144 -50.0%
ROPs
128
64 -50.0%
Compute Units
72
SM Count
36
Clocks
Base Clock
1825 MHz
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1650 MHz
Game Clock
2015 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
8,192 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
448.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L3 Cache
128 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
105.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
648.0 GTexel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
20.74 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,296.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
237.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
41.47 TFLOPS (2:1)
15.21 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
72
36 -50.0%
Tensor Cores
288
Power
TDP
300 W
185 W
TDP (W)
300
185 -38.3%
Suggested PSU
700 W
450 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 21
TU106
Generation
Navi II (RX 6000)
Mining GPUs
Process Size
7 nm
12 nm
Transistors
26,800 million
10,800 million
Die Size
520 mm²
445 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.5M / mm²
24.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
229 mm 9 inches
Height
120 mm 4.7 inches
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.12x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 1.0 x4
Other
Launch Price
649 USD
699 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi
Successor
Navi III
View Radeon RX 6800 XT Details View CMP 40HX Details