NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Comparison
NVIDIA B200 SXM6
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 and the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The B200 SXM6 has no recorded benchmark scores, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has two recorded entries. This asymmetry means a direct score-for-score comparison is not possible from the recorded data.
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 135,218. This places the card at the 95th percentile among all GPUs in the database.
The B200 SXM6 sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of any recorded benchmark results. The data does not indicate any wins for either product in head-to-head testing, as the head-to-head benchmark array is empty.
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's nearest rivals in the database provide useful context. The NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230, which is effectively identical with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396, placing it 0.1 percent ahead of the RTX 4000 Ada. The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774, or 0.4 percent ahead, and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472, or 0.9 percent ahead. These narrow margins indicate that the RTX 4000 Ada Generation sits in a tightly contested performance cluster among workstation-class accelerators.
The raw specification data reveals stark contrasts between the two products, even without benchmark scores. The B200 SXM6 is built around the GB100 chip with 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, compared to 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs on the RTX 4000 Ada. The B200 SXM6 also carries 592 tensor cores, while the RTX 4000 Ada has 192.
Memory configurations differ dramatically. The B200 SXM6 integrates 180 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s. This represents a 22.8 times difference in raw memory bandwidth in favor of the B200 SXM6.
Compute throughput figures reinforce the separation. The B200 SXM6 reaches 69.34 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 26.73 TFLOPS in both. The B200 SXM6 also leads in texture rate with 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 417.6 GTexel/s, though the RTX 4000 Ada leads in pixel rate with 139.2 GPixel/s versus 43.92 GPixel/s.
Clock behavior reflects their different design targets. The B200 SXM6 has a 120 MHz base clock and an 1830 MHz boost clock, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation starts at 1500 MHz base and boosts to 2175 MHz. The B200 SXM6's memory runs at 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective throughput, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada's memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective throughput.
The Verdict
The recorded data supports a clear separation of roles. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation graphics card with active benchmark results, a 95th percentile ranking, and confirmed API support. The B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator with no recorded benchmarks, no display outputs, and a 50th percentile ranking.
Users requiring a single-slot, 130 W card with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs should consider the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Its 95th percentile standing indicates strong performance relative to all GPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals all fall within 0.9 percent of its average score, confirming a competitive position in its class.
Users requiring maximum memory capacity and bandwidth for large-scale compute workloads should consider the B200 SXM6. The 180 GB HBM3e configuration with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth is an order of magnitude beyond the RTX 4000 Ada's capabilities. The 69.34 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is 2.6 times the RTX 4000 Ada's 26.73 TFLOPS.
The B200 SXM6 uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 interface, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The B200 SXM6 requires a 1400 W suggested power supply and consumes 1000 W, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation consumes 130 W with a 300 W suggested power supply. The B200 SXM6 also has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for direct display connectivity.
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B200 SXM6 lists no API support in the recorded data. This makes the RTX 4000 Ada the only one of the two with confirmed graphics API compatibility.
FAQ
Q: Which product has the higher benchmark score?
A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has recorded scores of 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan. The B200 SXM6 has no recorded benchmark scores, so no comparison is possible.
Q: How does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 with a 0 percent delta, the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 with a 0.1 percent delta, the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 with a 0.4 percent delta, and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 with a 0.9 percent delta. All four rivals fall within a narrow performance band.
Q: What memory configurations do the two products use?
A: The B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: Which product has more shading units?
A: The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 6,144 shading units.
Q: What are the power requirements for each product?
A: The B200 SXM6 has a 1000 W TDP and a 1400 W suggested power supply. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 130 W TDP and a 300 W suggested power supply.
Q: Does the B200 SXM6 support display outputs?
A: No. The B200 SXM6 has no display outputs. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.
Specification Differences
The two products differ in every major specification category recorded in the database.
The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip with 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Transistor density is 127.8M per mm² for the B200 SXM6 and 121.8M per mm² for the RTX 4000 Ada.
Base clocks are 120 MHz for the B200 SXM6 and 1500 MHz for the RTX 4000 Ada. Boost clocks are 1830 MHz and 2175 MHz, respectively. Memory clocks are 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective for the B200 SXM6 and 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the RTX 4000 Ada.
Memory size is 180 GB for the B200 SXM6 versus 20 GB for the RTX 4000 Ada. Memory type is HBM3e versus GDDR6. Bus width is 8192 bit versus 160 bit. Bandwidth is 8.19 TB/s versus 360.0 GB/s.
Shading units are 18,944 versus 6,144. TMUs are 592 versus 192. ROPs are 24 versus 64. Tensor cores are 592 versus 192. The RTX 4000 Ada has 48 RT cores, while the B200 SXM6 lists none.
Pixel rate is 43.92 GPixel/s for the B200 SXM6 and 139.2 GPixel/s for the RTX 4000 Ada. Texture rate is 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 417.6 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 69.34 TFLOPS for the B200 SXM6 and 26.73 TFLOPS for the RTX 4000 Ada.
TDP is 1000 W versus 130 W. Slot width is SXM Module versus single-slot. The RTX 4000 Ada uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, while the B200 SXM6 lists none. Suggested PSU is 1400 W versus 300 W. Bus interface is PCIe 6.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16.
Display outputs are none for the B200 SXM6 and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the RTX 4000 Ada. The RTX 4000 Ada measures 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height, while the B200 SXM6 has no recorded dimensions.
API support differs completely. The B200 SXM6 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The RTX 4000 Ada supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Release dates are October 31, 2024 for the B200 SXM6 and August 8, 2023 for the RTX 4000 Ada. The B200 SXM6 has a launch MSRP of 34,999 USD, while the RTX 4000 Ada has no recorded launch MSRP.
Architecture Differences
The B200 SXM6 is based on the Blackwell architecture, belonging to the Server Blackwell generation. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is based on Ada Lovelace architecture, belonging to the Workstation Ada generation.
Both products are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip, while the RTX 4000 Ada uses the AD104 chip. The B200 SXM6's die is 1628 mm², more than five times the RTX 4000 Ada's 294 mm² die.
The B200 SXM6 integrates 208,000 million transistors, compared to 35,800 million on the RTX 4000 Ada. The B200 SXM6 has a transistor density of 127.8M per mm², slightly higher than the RTX 4000 Ada's 121.8M per mm².
Compute resources are heavily skewed toward the B200 SXM6. It has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 592 tensor cores. The RTX 4000 Ada has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 192 tensor cores. The RTX 4000 Ada includes 48 RT cores, while the B200 SXM6 does not list an RT core count.
The B200 SXM6 uses HBM3e memory, a stacked memory technology with an 8192-bit bus. The RTX 4000 Ada uses GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus. This architectural choice explains the B200 SXM6's 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, which is 22.8 times the RTX 4000 Ada's 360.0 GB/s.
Clock strategy reflects the different design priorities. The B200 SXM6 has a very low 120 MHz base clock, typical of a power-constrained accelerator that boosts to 1830 MHz under load. The RTX 4000 Ada has a 1500 MHz base clock and a 2175 MHz boost, reflecting a workstation card designed for sustained graphics workloads.
The B200 SXM6 uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 interface, the newer generation bus. The RTX 4000 Ada uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The B200 SXM6 has no display outputs, consistent with a server accelerator. The RTX 4000 Ada provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, consistent with a workstation graphics card.
The B200 SXM6's predecessor is Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin. The RTX 4000 Ada's predecessor is Workstation Ampere, and its successor is Blackwell PRO W. Both products are currently marked as Active in production status.
The B200 SXM6 has a 1000 W TDP and uses an SXM module form factor. The RTX 4000 Ada has a 130 W TDP in a single-slot form factor with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The B200 SXM6 lists no power connector in the database.