NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA B200 SXM6

CORE STATE GB100
VRAM 180 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1830 MHz
TDP 1000 W
BUS WIDTH 8192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2475 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,854
geekbench_opencl
N/A
154,858
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
174,152
passmark_directx_10
N/A
139
passmark_directx_11
N/A
244
passmark_directx_12
N/A
103
passmark_directx_9
N/A
320
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,164
passmark_g3d
N/A
26,927
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
14,720

Analysis: NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

NVIDIA's B200 SXM6 and GeForce RTX 4070 occupy opposite ends of the hardware spectrum. The B200 SXM6 is a server-grade Blackwell accelerator with a launch MSRP of 34,999 USD, while the RTX 4070 is an end-of-life consumer Ada Lovelace card with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results for these two, as they are not designed for the same workloads. The B200 SXM6 has no recorded benchmark scores and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The RTX 4070, in contrast, has an average benchmark score of 37,648 and sits in the 81st percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain any direct benchmark comparisons between the B200 SXM6 and the RTX 4070. The head-to-head results are empty, and neither product records a win in a shared test. This absence reflects their fundamentally different target markets. The B200 SXM6 is a compute accelerator without display outputs, while the RTX 4070 is a graphics card with full display support. The B200 SXM6's benchmark array is empty, meaning no performance scores have been recorded for it in the database. The RTX 4070, however, has ten recorded benchmark results. In Passmark's G3D test, the RTX 4070 scores 26,927. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 154,858, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 174,152. The RTX 4070's Passmark GPU Compute score is 14,720. These scores place it 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (average score 37,628) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (average score 37,507). The RTX 4070 trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile by 1.3% (average score 38,135) and leads the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 by 1.3% (average score 37,157). Without a single overlapping benchmark, the data cannot establish a direct performance hierarchy between the B200 SXM6 and the RTX 4070.

FAQ

Q: Does the B200 SXM6 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The B200 SXM6 has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37,648 and a percentile rank of 81.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two?

A: The B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, providing 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 uses 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Are the architectures different?

A: Yes. The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip on the Blackwell architecture, built for the Server Blackwell generation. The RTX 4070 uses the AD104 chip on the Ada Lovelace architecture, built for the GeForce 40 generation.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, while the RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units. The B200 SXM6 also has 592 tensor cores versus 184 for the RTX 4070.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: No. The B200 SXM6 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The RTX 4070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The B200 SXM6 has a TDP of 1000 W and a suggested power supply of 1400 W. The RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W and a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Architecture Differences

The B200 SXM6 and RTX 4070 are built on entirely different architectures. The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip based on Blackwell, while the RTX 4070 uses the AD104 chip based on Ada Lovelace. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. The B200 SXM6 contains 208,000 million transistors on a die size of 1628 mm², giving a transistor density of 127.8 million per mm². The RTX 4070 contains 35,800 million transistors on a die size of 294 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The B200 SXM6 is from the Server Blackwell generation, with a predecessor of Server Hopper and a successor of Server Rubin. The RTX 4070 is from the GeForce 40 generation, with a predecessor of GeForce 30 and a successor of GeForce 50. The B200 SXM6 has no display outputs, while the RTX 4070 has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 4070 includes 46 ray tracing cores, a feature not listed for the B200 SXM6. The B200 SXM6's clock configuration starts at a base of 120 MHz and boosts to 1830 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz for 8 Gbps effective. The RTX 4070 has a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, with memory at 1313 MHz for 21 Gbps effective.

Specification Differences

The B200 SXM6 and RTX 4070 differ across nearly every specification field. The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The RTX 4070 has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The B200 SXM6's tensor core count is 592, while the RTX 4070 has 184 tensor cores. The B200 SXM6 achieves a pixel rate of 43.92 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,083.4 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 achieves a pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s. In FP32 and FP16 compute, the B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS for both, while the RTX 4070 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS for both. The B200 SXM6 uses an SXM module slot width, while the RTX 4070 is dual-slot. The B200 SXM6 uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 bus interface, while the RTX 4070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The B200 SXM6 has no power connectors listed, while the RTX 4070 uses a single 16-pin connector. The B200 SXM6 has no listed dimensions, while the RTX 4070 measures 240 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The B200 SXM6 was released on 2024-10-31, while the RTX 4070 was released on 2023-04-11. The B200 SXM6's production status is Active, while the RTX 4070 is End-of-life.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear separation of roles. The B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator with no display outputs and no API support for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan. It is designed for compute tasks, as shown by its 180 GB HBM3e memory, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, and 69.34 TFLOPS FP32 compute. The RTX 4070 is a consumer graphics card with full API support, display outputs, and a 200 W TDP. The B200 SXM6 carries a 1000 W TDP and requires a 1400 W power supply, while the RTX 4070 requires only a 550 W power supply. The RTX 4070 has a recorded average benchmark score of 37,648 and an 81st percentile rank, while the B200 SXM6 has no recorded scores. The B200 SXM6's transistor count of 208,000 million is roughly 5.8 times that of the RTX 4070, and its die size of 1628 mm² is over five times larger. The B200 SXM6 is built for server deployments, while the RTX 4070 is built for desktop graphics. The RTX 4070 is the only one of the two with benchmark evidence in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The B200 SXM6 wins in raw compute specifications. Its FP32 output of 69.34 TFLOPS is more than double the RTX 4070's 29.15 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 1,083.4 GTexel/s exceeds the RTX 4070's 455.4 GTexel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s is over sixteen times the RTX 4070's 504.2 GB/s. Its memory capacity of 180 GB is fifteen times the RTX 4070's 12 GB. The B200 SXM6 also has 592 tensor cores versus 184 for the RTX 4070. The B200 SXM6 uses a 8192-bit memory bus, compared to the RTX 4070's 192-bit bus. The B200 SXM6's 592 TMUs outnumber the RTX 4070's 184 TMUs. The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, more than three times the RTX 4070's 5,888.

The RTX 4070 wins in graphics-oriented features. Its pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s is higher than the B200 SXM6's 43.92 GPixel/s. It has 64 ROPs versus 24 for the B200 SXM6. The RTX 4070 has 46 ray tracing cores, which the B200 SXM6 does not list. The RTX 4070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the B200 SXM6 lists none. The RTX 4070 has display outputs, while the B200 SXM6 has none. The RTX 4070's boost clock of 2475 MHz exceeds the B200 SXM6's 1830 MHz boost clock. The RTX 4070's base clock of 1920 MHz is far higher than the B200 SXM6's 120 MHz base clock. The RTX 4070's TDP of 200 W is one-fifth of the B200 SXM6's 1000 W. The RTX 4070 has a recorded benchmark presence, with its Passmark G3D score of 26,927 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 174,152, while the B200 SXM6 has no recorded benchmark results. The RTX 4070's average benchmark score of 37,648 places it near the Tesla P4 (37,628) and RX Vega 56 (37,507), while the B200 SXM6's average score is 0. The RTX 4070 is the only one of the two with a percentile rank above 50, sitting at 81, while the B200 SXM6 sits at 50.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
B200 SXM6
RTX 4070
Core Specs
Shading Units
18,944
5,888 -68.9%
Shaders
18,944
5,888 -68.9%
TMUs
592
184 -68.9%
ROPs
24
64 +166.7%
SM Count
148
46 -68.9%
Clocks
Base Clock
120 MHz
1920 MHz
Boost Clock
1830 MHz
2475 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 8 Gbps effective
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
180 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
184,320
12,288 -93.3%
Memory Type
HBM3e
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
8192 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
8.19 TB/s
504.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
126 MB
36 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
43.92 GPixel/s
158.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1,083.4 GTexel/s
455.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
69.34 TFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
34.67 TFLOPS (1:2)
455.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
69.34 TFLOPS (1:1)
29.15 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
46
Tensor Cores
592
184 -68.9%
Power
TDP
1000 W
200 W
TDP (W)
1,000
200 -80.0%
Suggested PSU
1400 W
550 W
Power Connectors
—
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
GB100
AD104
Generation
Server Blackwell (Bxx)
GeForce 40
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
208,000 million
35,800 million
Die Size
1628 mm²
294 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
127.8M / mm²
121.8M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
—
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
—
4.6
Vulkan
—
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
10.0
8.9
Shader Model
—
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
SXM Module
Dual-slot
Length
—
240 mm 9.4 inches
Height
—
110 mm 4.3 inches
Outputs
No outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 6.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
34,999 USD
599 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Server Hopper
GeForce 30
Successor
Server Rubin
GeForce 50
View B200 SXM6 Details View GeForce RTX 4070 Details