NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA B200 SXM6

CORE STATE GB100
VRAM 180 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1830 MHz
TDP 1000 W
BUS WIDTH 8192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1470 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

Analysis: NVIDIA B200 SXM6 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum. The database shows no shared benchmark results between the two, as the B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator with an average benchmark score of zero, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q is a mobile graphics processor. Their percentile ranks are identical at 50, but this reflects their respective categories rather than direct performance equivalence. The B200 SXM6 targets massive compute workloads, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q is designed for portable devices.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct comparison is impossible because the recorded data contains no overlapping benchmarks. The B200 SXM6 lists no benchmark scores, and the RTX 4060 Max-Q also has an empty benchmark array. Both GPUs sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, but that figure is a category-wide placement, not a head-to-head measurement. The B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q delivers 9.032 TFLOPS. That is a 7.7x difference in raw floating-point throughput, with the B200 SXM6 leading by a wide margin. In FP16, the ratio is identical: 69.34 TFLOPS versus 9.032 TFLOPS, both operating at a 1:1 ratio with their FP32 rates. The pixel rate tells a different story. The RTX 4060 Max-Q achieves 70.56 GPixel/s, which is 60% higher than the B200 SXM6's 43.92 GPixel/s. The texture rate flips back to the server part: the B200 SXM6 reaches 1,083.4 GTexel/s, which is 7.7x the RTX 4060 Max-Q's 141.1 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth follows the same pattern. The B200 SXM6 moves data at 8.19 TB/s, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q manages 256.0 GB/s, a 32x gap in favor of the server accelerator. These numbers indicate that the B200 SXM6 dominates compute-heavy and bandwidth-intensive workloads, whereas the RTX 4060 Max-Q holds an advantage in pixel output for its power envelope.

Architecture Differences

The B200 SXM6 uses the GB100 chip based on the Blackwell architecture, classified under the Server Blackwell generation. The RTX 4060 Max-Q uses the AD107 chip based on Ada Lovelace, part of the GeForce 40 Mobile series. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the scale diverges sharply. The B200 SXM6 packs 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 127.8M per mm². The RTX 4060 Max-Q contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a density of 118.9M per mm². The B200 SXM6 is over 10x larger in die area and holds 11x more transistors. Memory configurations differ completely. The B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e across an 8192-bit bus, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q uses 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus. The memory clock is listed at 2000 MHz for both, with the B200 SXM6 rated at 8 Gbps effective and the RTX 4060 Max-Q at 16 Gbps effective. The B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The RTX 4060 Max-Q has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. Tensor core counts are 592 for the B200 SXM6 and 96 for the RTX 4060 Max-Q. The RTX 4060 Max-Q includes 24 ray tracing cores, while the B200 SXM6 lists no RT core count. Clock speeds show a striking difference: the B200 SXM6 has a base clock of 120 MHz and a boost of 1830 MHz, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q runs at 1140 MHz base and 1470 MHz boost. The B200 SXM6's extremely low base clock reflects its server power management profile. The B200 SXM6 uses a PCIe 6.0 x16 interface, whereas the RTX 4060 Max-Q uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The B200 SXM6 has no display outputs, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q's outputs are portable device dependent. API support also differs: the RTX 4060 Max-Q supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the B200 SXM6 lists N/A for all three APIs.

Where Each One Wins

The B200 SXM6 wins decisively in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 and FP16 scores of 69.34 TFLOPS dwarf the RTX 4060 Max-Q's 9.032 TFLOPS. Texture processing is another clear win: 1,083.4 GTexel/s versus 141.1 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth is the largest gap, with 8.19 TB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, a 32x advantage. These figures point to workloads like large-scale matrix operations, high-bandwidth data movement, and dense tensor computations. The B200 SXM6 also carries 592 tensor cores compared to 96, reinforcing its role for AI and deep learning tasks. The RTX 4060 Max-Q wins in pixel throughput, posting 70.56 GPixel/s against 43.92 GPixel/s. It also has double the ROP count at 48 versus 24. This suggests the mobile GPU handles rasterization-oriented tasks more efficiently per pixel. The RTX 4060 Max-Q also features 24 ray tracing cores, a capability the B200 SXM6 does not list. Power consumption is a major differentiator: the B200 SXM6 has a 1000 W TDP and requires a 1400 W suggested PSU, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q runs at 35 W with no external power connectors. The B200 SXM6 is an SXM module, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q is an IGP form factor. The RTX 4060 Max-Q supports modern graphics APIs, making it suitable for gaming and consumer applications, while the B200 SXM6 lacks any API support listings, aligning with its server-only design.

The Verdict

The data indicates two distinct deployment targets. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is a server accelerator with massive compute resources. Its 180 GB of HBM3e memory, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, and 69.34 TFLOPS FP32 performance place it firmly in high-performance computing, AI training, and data center inference roles. The 1000 W TDP and 1400 W suggested PSU confirm its installation in rack-mounted systems. The RTX 4060 Max-Q is a mobile GPU built for efficiency. Its 35 W TDP, 8 GB GDDR6 memory, and 9.032 TFLOPS FP32 performance suit thin-and-light laptops. The RTX 4060 Max-Q's display outputs, API support, and ray tracing cores make it a functional graphics solution for consumer devices. Users requiring maximum compute density should select the B200 SXM6. Users needing a power-efficient GPU with display output and modern graphics features should select the RTX 4060 Max-Q. The B200 SXM6 was released on 2024-10-31, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q launched on 2023-01-02. The B200 SXM6 has a launch MSRP of 34,999 USD. The RTX 4060 Max-Q has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is 7.7x higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q's 9.032 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The B200 SXM6 has a memory bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s using HBM3e across an 8192-bit bus, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q has 256.0 GB/s using GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus. The B200 SXM6 leads by a factor of 32.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The B200 SXM6 contains 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, while the RTX 4060 Max-Q contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing support?

A: The RTX 4060 Max-Q includes 24 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B200 SXM6 lists no ray tracing cores and has N/A for all API support fields.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The B200 SXM6 has a 1000 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 1400 W. The RTX 4060 Max-Q has a 35 W TDP and no power connectors or suggested PSU listed.

Q: When was each GPU released?

A: The B200 SXM6 was released on 2024-10-31, and the RTX 4060 Max-Q was released on 2023-01-02.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
B200 SXM6
RTX 4060 Max-Q
Core Specs
Shading Units
18,944
3,072 -83.8%
Shaders
18,944
3,072 -83.8%
TMUs
592
96 -83.8%
ROPs
24
48 +100.0%
SM Count
148
24 -83.8%
Clocks
Base Clock
120 MHz
1140 MHz
Boost Clock
1830 MHz
1470 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 8 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
180 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
184,320
8,192 -95.6%
Memory Type
HBM3e
GDDR6
Memory Bus
8192 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
8.19 TB/s
256.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
126 MB
32 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
43.92 GPixel/s
70.56 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1,083.4 GTexel/s
141.1 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
69.34 TFLOPS
9.032 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
34.67 TFLOPS (1:2)
141.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
69.34 TFLOPS (1:1)
9.032 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
24
Tensor Cores
592
96 -83.8%
Power
TDP
1000 W
35 W
TDP (W)
1,000
35 -96.5%
Suggested PSU
1400 W
—
Power Connectors
—
None
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
GB100
AD107
Generation
Server Blackwell (Bxx)
GeForce 40 Mobile
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
208,000 million
18,900 million
Die Size
1628 mm²
159 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
127.8M / mm²
118.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
—
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
—
4.6
Vulkan
—
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
10.0
8.9
Shader Model
—
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
SXM Module
IGP
Outputs
No outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 6.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
34,999 USD
—
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Server Hopper
GeForce 30 Mobile
Successor
Server Rubin
GeForce 50 Mobile
View B200 SXM6 Details View GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q Details