GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

A2

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1770 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
24,546
35,357
geekbench_vulkan
24,747
34,023

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA A2

Rendering performance tests between GeForce NVIDIA A2 and Radeon Arc A350M indicate a obvious champion. GeForce NVIDIA A2 offers considerably stronger performance across recent AAA releases. This graphics memory benefit and design upgrades lead into obviously smoother gameplay experiences. Benchmark results validates this conclusion. Enthusiasts looking for high-end visuals would factor this in.

Radeon Arc A350M has difficulty to match GeForce NVIDIA A2's pure power. For cost-sensitive builders, Radeon Arc A350M can nonetheless provide acceptable capability, but buyers wanting premium performance might look toward GeForce NVIDIA A2. The benchmark gap is notably notable to overlook. Intensive scenarios notably highlight this margin. This investment provides benefits in frame rates.

In-game results over various resolutions consistently favor GeForce NVIDIA A2. Whether it's multiplayer games to AAA productions, GeForce NVIDIA A2 keeps its edge. This performance reliability in diverse titles indicates underlying design advantages. Users can count on capable experiences independent of scenario. This flexibility is remarkable.

Ultimately: GeForce NVIDIA A2 secures this showdown obviously. Users seeking rendering power should certainly select GeForce NVIDIA A2 over Radeon Arc A350M. This score numbers confirms this assessment. Your games will perform considerably more fluidly. It's a definite choice in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A350M
A2
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
1,280 +66.7%
Shaders
768
1,280 +66.7%
TMUs
48
40 -16.7%
ROPs
24
32 +33.3%
SM Count
10
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1150 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1770 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1563 MHz 12.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
200.1 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
56.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
4.531 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
70.80 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
4.531 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Tensor Cores
40
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
25 W
60 W
TDP (W)
25
60 +140.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA107
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
8,700 million
Die Size
157 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View Arc A350M Details View A2 Details