Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile vs NVIDIA B200 SXM6 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile or the NVIDIA B200 SXM6. Both entries show an average benchmark score of zero, and each is positioned at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database. With no head-to-head benchmark results available, the comparison must rely on the technical specifications and architectural data recorded for each part.

The most significant numerical gap between the two lies in raw compute throughput. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile provides 819.2 GFLOPS. This translates to the B200 SXM6 offering roughly 84.6 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel integrated solution. In FP16 compute, the gap narrows slightly relative to the ratio of each card's native mode: the B200 SXM6 sustains 69.34 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Intel part reaches 1.638 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Texture and pixel throughput follow the same lopsided pattern. The B200 SXM6 processes 1,083.4 GTexel/s against the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile's 25.60 GTexel/s, a margin of roughly 42.3 times. Pixel rate favors the NVIDIA part at 43.92 GPixel/s versus 12.80 GPixel/s, a 3.4 times advantage. The B200 SXM6 also fields 18,944 shading units, 592 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs, compared to 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs on the Intel chip.

Memory capacity and bandwidth are categorically different. The B200 SXM6 carries 180 GB of HBM3e across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, so no fixed capacity or throughput figure can be cited. The B200 SXM6's memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective data rate; the Intel part's memory clock is likewise system-shared.

Clock speeds present a nuanced picture. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 1600 MHz. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has a lower base of 120 MHz but a higher boost of 1830 MHz. The boost advantage for NVIDIA is 14.4% over Intel's maximum, though the Intel part's higher base clock suggests a design tuned for sustained operation in constrained thermal envelopes typical of mobile integrated graphics.

The power envelope diverges sharply. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is rated at 15 W TDP, while the B200 SXM6 draws 1000 W TDP. The B200 SXM6 also lists a suggested PSU of 1400 W, a figure absent for the Intel part. This 66.7-fold difference in TDP contextualizes the performance gap: the B200 SXM6 delivers its compute advantage while consuming substantially more power per unit of work, though efficiency metrics are not recorded in the database.

Neither part has a recorded win count in the head-to-head benchmarks table, as no benchmarks exist for either. The percentile positions at 50 for both indicate no competitive ranking differentiation in the absence of test data.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 delivers 69.34 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, compared to 819.2 GFLOPS for the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile. The B200 SXM6's FP32 throughput is approximately 84.6 times higher.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, achieving 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning its capacity and throughput are determined by the host system's RAM.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores available for either GPU?

A: No. Both the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile and the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 have an average benchmark score of zero in the database, and each sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. No head-to-head benchmark results are recorded for either part.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is rated at 15 W TDP. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is rated at 1000 W TDP and lists a suggested PSU of 1400 W. The B200 SXM6 consumes 66.7 times the power of the Intel integrated GPU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 has 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The B200 SXM6 also includes 592 tensor cores, while the Intel part has none recorded.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile boosts to 1600 MHz from a 300 MHz base. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 boosts to 1830 MHz from a 120 MHz base. The B200 SXM6's boost clock is 14.4% higher than Intel's, though Intel's base clock is 150% higher than NVIDIA's.

The Verdict

The data positions these two GPUs at opposite ends of the hardware spectrum. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is an integrated solution with system-shared memory, a 15 W TDP, and a boost clock of 1600 MHz. Its 819.2 GFLOPS FP32 throughput and 25.60 GTexel/s texture rate suit lightweight graphics workloads in portable devices. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 is a discrete server module with 180 GB of HBM3e, an 8192-bit bus, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, and 69.34 TFLOPS FP32 performance. Its 1000 W TDP and suggested 1400 W PSU indicate a part designed for data center compute, not end-user graphics.

For any workload involving heavy parallel compute, large memory footprints, or tensor operations, the B200 SXM6 is the only viable option based on the recorded data. Its 592 tensor cores and 69.34 TFLOPS FP16 at 1:1 ratio directly address AI and scientific workloads. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile offers no tensor cores and caps FP16 at 1.638 TFLOPS in 2:1 mode.

For scenarios requiring minimal power draw, integrated simplicity, and portability, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile stands alone. The 15 W TDP allows operation in systems where a 1000 W module cannot physically fit or be powered. The system-shared memory design eliminates dedicated VRAM allocation, though it sacrifices the deterministic bandwidth the B200 SXM6 provides.

Neither part records benchmark scores, so the verdict relies on specification comparison. The B200 SXM6's production status is Active with a release date of 2024-10-31, while the Intel part is also Active with a release date of 2023-01-03. The B200 SXM6 lists a launch MSRP of 34,999 USD, a figure absent for the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile. The B200 SXM6 succeeds Server Hopper and precedes Server Rubin; the Intel part succeeds no recorded predecessor and lists Arc Graphics-M as its successor.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification category. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the NVIDIA B200 SXM6 uses a 5 nm node from TSMC. The B200 SXM6 records 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, yielding a density of 127.8M transistors per mm². The Intel part records no transistor count, die size, or density.

Clock behavior diverges: Intel's base is 300 MHz, NVIDIA's is 120 MHz. Boost clocks are 1600 MHz versus 1830 MHz. Memory clocks are system-shared for Intel and 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective for NVIDIA. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ: system-shared versus 180 GB HBM3e, system-shared versus 8192 bit, system-dependent versus 8.19 TB/s.

Compute resources differ in count and capability. Intel fields 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. NVIDIA fields 18,944 shading units, 592 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The B200 SXM6 adds 592 tensor cores; Intel records none. Pixel rates are 12.80 GPixel/s versus 43.92 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 25.60 GTexel/s versus 1,083.4 GTexel/s. FP32 is 819.2 GFLOPS versus 69.34 TFLOPS. FP16 is 1.638 TFLOPS at 2:1 versus 69.34 TFLOPS at 1:1.

Power and physical specifications also differ. TDP is 15 W versus 1000 W. Slot width is IGP versus SXM Module. The B200 SXM6 lists a suggested PSU of 1400 W; Intel has none. Bus interface is Ring Bus versus PCIe 6.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent for Intel and "No outputs" for NVIDIA. API support differs: Intel supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4; NVIDIA records N/A for all three.

Release dates differ by roughly 22 months. The Intel part launched on 2023-01-03; the B200 SXM6 launched on 2024-10-31. The B200 SXM6 has a recorded launch MSRP of 34,999 USD; Intel has none. The B200 SXM6 lists a predecessor (Server Hopper) and successor (Server Rubin); Intel lists no predecessor and Arc Graphics-M as successor.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is built on Generation 12.2 architecture with the chip codename Raptor Lake, part of the HD Graphics-M generation. The NVIDIA B200 SXM6 uses the Blackwell architecture with the GB100 chip, belonging to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation.

Process technology separates the two by a full node generation. Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry. NVIDIA uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The B200 SXM6 records 208,000 million transistors on a 1628 mm² die, a density of 127.8M per mm². Intel records no transistor data, leaving the architectural complexity comparison incomplete.

The memory architecture is categorically different. The Intel part uses system-shared memory, meaning no dedicated VRAM exists and bandwidth depends on the host system. The B200 SXM6 uses 180 GB of HBM3e on a 8192-bit bus, a configuration designed for massive parallel data access. The 8.19 TB/s bandwidth figure indicates a memory subsystem engineered for high-throughput compute, not display output.

Compute architecture diverges in tensor capability. The B200 SXM6 includes 592 tensor cores, enabling matrix operations for AI workloads. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile records no tensor cores. FP16 handling also differs: Intel achieves 1.638 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning it processes half-precision at half the FP32 rate; NVIDIA achieves 69.34 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, meaning full-rate FP16 throughput.

The B200 SXM6's 120 MHz base clock versus Intel's 300 MHz base suggests different operating philosophies. NVIDIA's design relies on boosting to 1830 MHz under load, while Intel's higher base clock indicates a steady-state operation model for power-constrained mobile environments. The 1000 W TDP for NVIDIA versus 15 W for Intel reflects these divergent design targets.

Interface and output architecture differ entirely. Intel uses a Ring Bus interface and portable-device-dependent display outputs, supporting DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. NVIDIA uses PCIe 6.0 x16 and has no display outputs, with all three graphics APIs listed as N/A. The B200 SXM6 is a compute accelerator without video output, while the Intel part is a display-capable integrated GPU.

Production status for both is Active, but their lifecycles differ. The Intel part released in January 2023 and has Arc Graphics-M as a successor. The B200 SXM6 released in October 2024, succeeding Server Hopper and preceding Server Rubin. The B200 SXM6's 34,999 USD launch MSRP, though not directly comparable to Intel's absent pricing, signals a server-class positioning that the integrated Intel GPU does not share.