Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs Intel UHD Graphics P750 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits cleanly between these two integrated graphics solutions. Intel UHD Graphics 750 wins the only direct head-to-head comparison recorded in the database, taking the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 6743 against the P750's 6554. That is a 2.9% advantage, a modest but measurable lead in raw compute throughput.

The Intel UHD Graphics P750 does not win any recorded benchmark comparison. Its sole benchmark entry, Geekbench OpenCL at 6554, stands as its best recorded result, but it trails the UHD Graphics 750 in every direct measurement available. The P750's average benchmark score of 6554 also sits below the UHD Graphics 750's average of 7441.

Looking at the broader database, the UHD Graphics 750 holds a percentile rank of 40 against all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 40% of the database population. The P750 sits at percentile 38. That gap is small, but it reflects the average score difference: the UHD Graphics 750's average of 7441 is roughly 13.5% higher than the P750's 6554 average.

For use-case planning, the UHD Graphics 750 is the safer pick for general compute workloads measured by OpenCL, especially if the workload is sensitive to raw throughput. The P750, despite having higher texture and pixel rates in its specification, does not translate that into a benchmark win. The recorded data shows the UHD Graphics 750 as the consistent performer.

Architecture Differences

Both chips share the same foundation: Intel's Rocket Lake platform, built on Generation 12.1 architecture using Intel's 14 nm+++ process. Both are integrated graphics processors (IGP) with system-shared memory, motherboard-dependent display outputs, and a Ring Bus interface. The API support is identical: DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The core counts are the same: 256 shading units and 2:1 FP16 ratio producing 665.6 GFLOPS FP32 and 1,331.2 GFLOPS FP16. The key differences appear in the fixed-function hardware. The P750 has 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) and 32 render output units (ROPs), while the UHD Graphics 750 has 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. This is a 4x difference in both texture and pixel throughput. The P750's texture rate is 83.20 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate is 41.60 GPixel/s. The UHD Graphics 750 manages 20.80 GTexel/s and 10.40 GPixel/s.

Clock behavior also differs. The UHD Graphics 750 has a base clock of 300 MHz, while the P750 starts at 350 MHz. Both boost to 1300 MHz. The higher base clock gives the P750 a slight initial frequency advantage, although the boost clock parity means sustained maximum performance is identical. The P750 is also classified under "HD Graphics-W" (Rocket Lake), while the UHD Graphics 750 is under "HD Graphics (Rocket Lake)". The P750 has no recorded release date; the UHD Graphics 750 was released on 2021-03-29. Both are end-of-life products.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single recorded head-to-head benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL. Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 6743, and Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 6554. The delta is 2.9% in favor of the UHD Graphics 750. This is the only direct comparison in the database, so conclusions must be drawn carefully.

The UHD Graphics 750 also has a second benchmark entry, Geekbench Vulkan, with a score of 8138. The P750 has no Vulkan result recorded, so the UHD Graphics 750's Vulkan performance is its own achievement, but there is no rival number to compare against within this page's data. The 8138 Vulkan score is significantly higher than its own OpenCL score of 6743, suggesting the architecture handles Vulkan workloads more efficiently.

In terms of nearest rivals, the UHD Graphics 750's average score of 7441 places it between the AMD Radeon R7 350 (7425, 0.2% ahead) and the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447, 0.1% behind). It is also within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7472) and 1.4% behind the Intel Arc A310 (7550). The P750's average of 6554 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M (6513, 0.6% behind) and the AMD Radeon HD 7730M (6581, 0.4% ahead). The P750 is 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon R7 M460 (6612) and 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M (6493).

The data indicates the UHD Graphics 750 competes with a slightly higher tier of discrete mobile GPUs than the P750. The 750's nearest rivals are all within 1.4% of its average score, while the P750's nearest rivals are all within 0.9%. Both are tightly clustered in their respective performance bands.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in the recorded head-to-head benchmark?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 wins the only direct comparison, Geekbench OpenCL, with a score of 6743 against the P750's 6554. That is a 2.9% performance advantage.

Q: Do the two GPUs have different shading or compute capabilities?

A: No. Both have 256 shading units, 16 TMUs for the 750 versus 64 for the P750, and 8 ROPs for the 750 versus 32 for the P750. FP32 compute is identical at 665.6 GFLOPS.

Q: What is the difference in pixel and texture rates?

A: The P750 has a texture rate of 83.20 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 41.60 GPixel/s. The UHD Graphics 750's texture rate is 20.80 GTexel/s and its pixel rate is 10.40 GPixel/s. The P750 has 4x the rates in both categories.

Q: Why does the P750 have higher texture and pixel rates but lose the benchmark?

A: The recorded Geekbench OpenCL score depends on the overall compute workload, not just rasterization throughput. The UHD Graphics 750 scores 6743 versus 6554, despite the P750's higher TMU and ROP counts.

Q: Are there any API differences between the two GPUs?

A: No. Both support DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the performance percentile of each GPU?

A: The UHD Graphics 750 sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The P750 sits at the 38th percentile.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the stronger performer. It wins the only direct benchmark comparison, holds a higher average benchmark score (7441 versus 6554), and achieves a higher percentile ranking (40 versus 38). If the task is a compute workload measured by OpenCL, the UHD Graphics 750 provides a 2.9% margin over the P750.

The P750 has a clear specification advantage in texture and render units: 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs versus 16 and 8, respectively. This translates to 4x the pixel and texture rates. For workloads that are heavily dependent on fill rate, the P750's hardware is theoretically better equipped. However, no benchmark in the database confirms this advantage in practice. The one recorded score shows the opposite result.

The P750 also has a higher base clock of 350 MHz versus 300 MHz, but both boost to the same 1300 MHz. The compute ceiling is identical.

Who should pick which? The data supports taking the UHD Graphics 750 for general compute and any OpenCL-based application. That is where the recorded measurements favor it. The P750 may be worth consideration only if fill-rate-bound tasks are certain, but the benchmark does not validate that expectation. For a database-driven choice, the UHD Graphics 750 is the answer.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |

| TMUs | 16 | 64 |

| ROPs | 8 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 41.60 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 83.20 GTexel/s |

| Generation | HD Graphics (Rocket Lake) | HD Graphics-W (Rocket Lake) |

| Release Date | 2021-03-29 | Not recorded |

| Geekbench OpenCL | 6743 | 6554 |

| Geekbench Vulkan | 8138 | Not recorded |

| Average Benchmark Score | 7441 | 6554 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 40 | 38 |

| Head-to-Head Win | 1 | 0 |

Everything else in the specification list matches: 14 nm+++ process, 256 shading units, 665.6 GFLOPS FP32, 1,331.2 GFLOPS FP16, 15 W TDP, System Shared memory, Ring Bus interface, Motherboard Dependent display outputs, and identical API support. The P750's higher fill-rate hardware does not show up as a win in the recorded benchmark data.