Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison
Intel UHD Graphics P750
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
Intel UHD Graphics P750 is an integrated graphics solution from Intel’s Rocket Lake generation, built on the Generation 12.1 architecture and a 14 nm+++ process node. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a discrete add-in board from the GeForce 50-series, using the GB203 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The two products sit in entirely different performance strata, with the P750 achieving an average benchmark score of 6554 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6270 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Their percentile rankings against all GPUs are close — 38th for the Intel part and 36th for the NVIDIA part — but the benchmarks themselves measure different workloads, making direct comparison a matter of interpreting what each test represents.
FAQ
Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare between the two?
A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 scores 6554 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6270 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. These are different tests, so the scores are not directly comparable; the Geekbench test emphasizes compute workloads, while Steel Nomad targets modern DX12 gaming scenarios.
Q: What are the nearest rivals for the Intel UHD Graphics P750?
A: Its closest competitors include the AMD Radeon HD 7730M (average score 6581, delta -0.4%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M (6513, delta +0.6%), AMD Radeon R7 M460 (6612, delta -0.9%), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M (6493, delta +0.9%). The P750 is within 1% of all these parts.
Q: What are the nearest rivals for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at a 0% delta (both score 6270), sits 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K620 (6282), 0.8% behind the AMD FirePro W600 (6223), and 0.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6327, delta -0.9%).
Q: What is the memory configuration difference?
A: The Intel P750 uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What are the thermal and power design differences?
A: The Intel part has a TDP of 15 W and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with motherboard-dependent display outputs. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 350 W, is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.
Q: Which product is still in production?
A: The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is marked as end-of-life, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is listed as active production. The NVIDIA card’s release date is December 31, 2025.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 wins in compute-oriented workloads as measured by Geekbench OpenCL, where it posts a score of 6554. This places it in the 38th percentile of all GPUs, which is slightly higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 36th percentile. The P750’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R7 M460, scores 6612, showing that the Intel part is competitive in general-purpose compute tasks despite being an integrated solution. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in modern gaming performance, as suggested by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6270, a test designed to stress contemporary rendering paths. The RTX card’s dedicated 16 GB GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a clear advantage in texture-heavy scenarios, whereas the P750’s system-shared memory is dependent on the host platform.
For users running legacy OpenCL compute kernels or basic desktop acceleration, the P750’s 256 shading units and 64 TMUs deliver adequate throughput, evidenced by its sub-1% delta against the GTX 670M. For gamers or professionals needing ray tracing, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores are far beyond the P750’s capabilities, which lack dedicated RT or tensor hardware. The P750 also wins on power efficiency at 15 W versus 350 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light systems, while the RTX card demands a robust power supply with its 16-pin connector.
Architecture Differences
The Intel UHD Graphics P750 is built on Intel’s Generation 12.1 architecture, specifically the HD Graphics-W variant for Rocket Lake. It uses a 14 nm+++ process node manufactured by Intel and connects via a Ring Bus interface. The chip integrates 256 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, with no dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores. Its FP32 throughput is 665.6 GFLOPS, and FP16 is 1,331.2 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The P750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but lacks the full feature set of newer architectures.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process with the GB203 chip. It packs 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, indicating full-rate half-precision compute. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders, alongside OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The transistor count is 45,600 million on a 378 mm² die, yielding a density of 120.6 million transistors per mm² — a stark contrast to the P750’s older, denser 14 nm process.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel P750 has a base clock of 350 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory is system-shared for the Intel part, whereas the NVIDIA card offers 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) memory clock. The P750’s pixel rate is 41.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 83.20 GTexel/s, compared to the RTX card’s 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s. TDP is 15 W for Intel versus 350 W for NVIDIA. The P750 is an IGP with no slot width or power connectors, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is dual-slot with a 16-pin connector. Display outputs are motherboard-dependent on the Intel side, but the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Finally, the P750 uses a Ring Bus interface, and the RTX card uses PCIe 5.0 x16.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
There are no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel UHD Graphics P750 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in the data. Instead, each product has its own benchmark test with a different workload. The Intel part scores 6554 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is a compute-heavy test. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R7 M460, scores 6612, meaning the P750 is 0.9% behind that part. The P750 is 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M (6513) and 0.9% ahead of the GT 555M (6493), showing it clusters tightly with mobile GPUs from a decade ago.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6270 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, scores exactly 6270, resulting in a 0% delta. The Quadro K620 scores 6282, putting the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER 0.2% behind that professional card, while the AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, making the RTX part 0.8% faster. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, so the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 0.9% slower than that entry-level mobile part. These deltas highlight that the Steel Nomad score is not indicative of raw compute power but rather of specific DX12 rendering performance, where the RTX card’s dedicated resources are optimized for gaming.
The biggest win for the Intel P750 is its percentile ranking: 38th versus the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 36th. This suggests that in the aggregate database, the P750 outperforms a slightly larger fraction of all GPUs in its tested workload. However, the nature of the tests means this is not a meaningful comparison of real-world capability. The RTX card’s massive advantages in pixel rate (235.4 GPixel/s vs 41.60 GPixel/s) and texture rate (686.6 GTexel/s vs 83.20 GTexel/s) indicate it will dominate any graphics-intensive task, even if the database percentile positions are close.
The Verdict
Data from the FACT PACK shows that the Intel UHD Graphics P750 is a legacy integrated solution with compute performance comparable to mid-2010s mobile discrete GPUs. Its 6554 Geekbench OpenCL score and 38th percentile ranking place it in the lower-middle tier of the database, with nearest rivals like the GTX 670M and R7 M460. It is suitable for basic compute tasks, legacy OpenCL applications, and systems where 15 W power draw is a priority. The P750 is end-of-life, so it is only relevant for existing systems or budget builds with minimal GPU demands.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, despite its lower percentile (36th) and average score (6270) in a different benchmark, is a modern high-end discrete card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 70 RT cores. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance is 66 times higher than the P750’s 665.6 GFLOPS. The RTX card is active in production and aimed at gaming and professional workloads requiring ray tracing and tensor operations. For any user needing modern graphics features, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice. For users with legacy compute needs or power constraints, the P750 offers a functional, low-power alternative, but its end-of-life status and lack of dedicated memory limit its utility. The data implies a simple split: the P750 for lightweight, integrated compute, and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER for serious rendering and AI tasks.