Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum. The database shows the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER as a discrete, high-power add-in card built for demanding workloads, while the Intel UHD 710 Mobile is an integrated processor graphics solution for portable devices. Benchmark results indicate a massive performance gulf, with the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivering a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark score, placing it at the 50th percentile of all GPUs versus the RTX card's 36th percentile ranking.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile wins in power efficiency and system integration. Its 15 W TDP is designed for portable devices, using system shared memory and a Ring Bus interface, making it suitable for basic display output and light 2D workloads. The data shows no benchmark scores for this part, meaning it has no measurable win in raw 3D performance.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every measurable performance category. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 represents the only recorded benchmark in the database, and it outperforms its nearest rivals by a narrow margin. The card is 0.8% ahead of the AMD FirePro W600 (score 6223), ties the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (score 6270, 0% delta), and is 0.9% faster than the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (score 6327, -0.9% delta). It delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile produces 307.2 GFLOPS.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do their shading unit counts compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, whereas the Intel UHD 710 Mobile has 128 shading units.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, while the Intel UHD 710 Mobile has a 15 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing capabilities?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER features 70 RT cores. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile has no RT core data recorded.

Q: What are their DirectX support levels?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel UHD 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two GPUs. The only recorded benchmark for either part is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no completed tests.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's score places it in a tight competitive cluster. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly at 6270 (0% delta), edges out the AMD FirePro W600 by 0.8% (6223 score), and trails the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9% (6327 score). The Quadro K620 sits at 6282, which is 0.2% above the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. These deltas are all within a 1.7% range, indicating benchmark noise rather than meaningful performance differences.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's theoretical throughput figures reinforce its positioning. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 output, 235.4 GPixel/s pixel fill rate, and 686.6 GTexel/s texture fill rate are all consistent with a high-end discrete GPU. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile's 307.2 GFLOPS FP32, 4.800 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 9.600 GTexel/s texture rate reflect its integrated nature and 15 W power envelope.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, achieving 120.6M transistors per mm². The Intel UHD 710 Mobile uses a 10 nm Intel process with no transistor or die size data recorded.

Clock speeds show the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER running at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 1200 MHz boost. The RTX card has dedicated GDDR7 memory (16 GB, 256-bit, 896.0 GB/s), while the Intel part relies on system shared memory.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no RT or tensor core data. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 4.800 GPixel/s, texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 9.600 GTexel/s, and FP32 is 43.94 TFLOPS versus 307.2 GFLOPS. FP16 is 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA and 614.4 GFLOPS (2:1) for Intel.

Power delivery and physical design differ substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, dual-slot form factor, 1x 16-pin power connector, PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and measures 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm. The Intel part has a 15 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connector data, Ring Bus interface, and no dimension data.

Display outputs also diverge. The RTX card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Intel part's outputs are listed as portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 (Intel 12_1, NVIDIA 12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB203 chip, part of the GeForce 50-series generation. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses Generation 12.2 architecture on the Raptor Lake chip, part of the HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) generation. Intel manufactures this on a 10 nm process.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's transistor count of 45,600 million on a 378 mm² die indicates a dense, high-complexity design. Its 280 tensor cores enable AI acceleration, and its 70 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile has no tensor or RT core data, reflecting its simpler integrated design.

Memory architecture separates the two fundamentally. The RTX card uses dedicated GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with bandwidth dependent on the host system. This affects how each GPU accesses data and its ability to handle large textures and frame buffers.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which lacks some of these advanced features. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX card's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides high bandwidth to the host system, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus, typical for integrated graphics. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin power connector, while the Intel part is an IGP with no power connector. The RTX card's release date is 2025-12-31, and the Intel part's release date is 2023-01-03.

The Verdict

The data indicates these GPUs serve entirely different purposes. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated solution with a 15 W TDP, system shared memory, and 128 shading units. It has no recorded benchmark scores, meaning its performance cannot be quantified from the database. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs reflects its position as a basic display adapter.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-end discrete GPU with 8960 shading units, 16 GB GDDR7, 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, and a 350 W TDP. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 places it in a tight cluster with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (6270, 0% delta), Quadro K620 (6282, -0.2%), and AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6327, -0.9%). The performance differences among these rivals are within 1.7%, indicating statistical equivalence.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only choice for GPU-accelerated workloads. Its ray tracing cores, tensor cores, and dedicated fast memory provide capabilities the Intel part lacks entirely. The Intel UHD 710 Mobile is suitable only for basic display output in portable devices, where its 15 W power draw and system shared memory are appropriate.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's launch MSRP is 749 USD. Its dimensions of 304 mm length and dual-slot width require a full-size chassis with adequate cooling and a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Intel part has no physical installation requirements beyond the host device.

Users requiring hardware ray tracing, high pixel fill rates, or substantial FP32 compute should select the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Users building low-power portable systems that only need display output should use the integrated Intel solution. The database shows no overlap in their target use cases, and the performance data confirms this separation.