GPU Comparison
GPU
Intel HD Graphics 16EU Mobile
CORE STATE
Ironlake
VRAM
System Shared
CLOCK SPEED
500 MHz
TDP
35 W
BUS WIDTH
System Shared
ARCHITECTURE
Generation 5.75
PROCESS
45 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2010
VS
GEFORCE
GeForce GTX 285M
CORE STATE
G92B
VRAM
1024 MB
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
75 W
BUS WIDTH
256 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Tesla
PROCESS
55 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2010
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
HD Graphics 16EU Mobile
GTX 285M
Core Specs
Shading Units
96
128
+33.3%
Shaders
96
128
+33.3%
TMUs
16
64
+300.0%
ROPs
2
16
+700.0%
SM Count
—
16
Execution Units
16
—
Clocks
Base Clock
133 MHz
—
Boost Clock
500 MHz
—
GPU Clock
—
600 MHz
Shader Clock
—
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1000 MHz
2 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
1024 MB
VRAM (MB)
—
1,024
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR3
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
64.00 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
—
64 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
9.600 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
8.000 GTexel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
96.00 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
Power
TDP
35 W
75 W
TDP (W)
35
75
+114.3%
Power Connectors
—
None
Architecture
Architecture
Generation 5.75
Tesla
GPU Name
Ironlake
G92B
Generation
HD Graphics-M
(Westmere)
GeForce 200M
Process Size
45 nm
55 nm
Transistors
177 million
754 million
Die Size
114 mm²
260 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
1.6M / mm²
2.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
2.1
3.3
OpenCL
—
1.1
CUDA
—
1.1
Shader Model
4.1
4.0
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
MXM Module
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
QPI
MXM-B (3.0)
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
—
GeForce 100M
Successor
—
GeForce 300M