GPU Comparison
GPU
Intel GMA X4500M
CORE STATE
Eaglelake
VRAM
System Shared
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
13 W
BUS WIDTH
System Shared
ARCHITECTURE
Generation 5.0
PROCESS
65 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2008
VS
GEFORCE
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
CORE STATE
GT200
VRAM
896 MB
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
182 W
BUS WIDTH
448 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Tesla 2.0
PROCESS
65 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2008
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
GMA X4500M
GTX 260 Core 216
Core Specs
Shading Units
80
216
+170.0%
Shaders
80
216
+170.0%
TMUs
10
72
+620.0%
ROPs
1
28
+2700.0%
SM Count
—
27
Execution Units
10
—
Clocks
GPU Clock
400 MHz
576 MHz
Shader Clock
—
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
999 MHz
1998 Mbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
896 MB
VRAM (MB)
—
896
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR3
Memory Bus
System Shared
448 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
111.9 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
—
224 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
400.0 MPixel/s
16.13 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
64.00 GFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
—
67.07 GFLOPS (1:8)
Power
TDP
13 W
182 W
TDP (W)
13
182
+1300.0%
Suggested PSU
—
450 W
Power Connectors
—
2x 6-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Generation 5.0
Tesla 2.0
GPU Name
Eaglelake
GT200
Generation
GMA Graphics-M
(GMA 4500M IGP)
GeForce 200
Process Size
65 nm
65 nm
Transistors
—
1,400 million
Die Size
—
576 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
—
2.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
10.0
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
2.0
3.3
OpenCL
—
1.1
CUDA
—
1.3
Shader Model
4.0
4.0
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
267 mm
10.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x DVI1x S-Video
Bus Interface
FSB
PCIe 2.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
299 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
—
GeForce 9
Successor
—
GeForce 400