Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, with a score of 6269.5 points. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no benchmark entries in the database, so no direct head-to-head measurement exists between these two units. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Intel part occupies the 50th percentile based on its recorded specifications, though that percentile figure is not derived from any actual benchmark run.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's nearest rival data provides context for its single score. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly at 6270 points, a delta of 0 percent. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282 points, placing the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER 0.2 percent behind that card. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8 percent with 6223 points, while the AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads by 0.9 percent at 6327 points. These deltas are narrow, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's measured performance lands within a tight cluster of results ranging from 6223 to 6327 points.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no nearest rival data and no benchmark scores, so its comparative standing cannot be quantified from recorded measurements. The absence of head-to-head results means the database offers no direct comparison of compute performance, rendering, or rasterization between the two cards. The only meaningful numeric comparison comes from the architectural specifications, which are detailed below.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip built on Intel's Generation 12.5 architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The die contains 100,000 million transistors across a 1280 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 78.1 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its die holds 45,600 million transistors over 378 mm², achieving a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

The Intel chip carries 14336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, and no ROPs, with a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. It includes 112 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA chip has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s. It includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The Intel part's texture rate reaches 1,388.8 GTexel/s, while the NVIDIA part delivers 686.6 GTexel/s.

Compute throughput is nearly identical in raw FP32 terms. The Intel card outputs 44.44 TFLOPS FP32 and the same 44.44 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 43.94 TFLOPS FP16, also at 1:1. The difference is 0.5 TFLOPS in favor of Intel, a margin of roughly 1.1 percent. Despite vastly different transistor counts and die areas, the two cards produce almost equal floating-point results.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The Intel card uses 96 GB of HBM2e with an 8192-bit bus and 2.46 TB/s bandwidth, running at 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective speed. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 with a 256-bit bus and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. Intel's memory bandwidth is 2.75 times higher, while NVIDIA's memory capacity is one-sixth of Intel's. The Intel card's memory clock is lower, but the extreme bus width compensates.

The Intel card has no display outputs, while the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Intel card supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan support listed. The NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16 interfaces.

Power and physical specifications differ. The Intel card draws 450 W TDP with a suggested 850 W PSU, mounted as an OAM Module with no power connector listed. The NVIDIA card draws 350 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector, no suggested PSU listed, and fits a dual-slot form factor measuring 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm. The Intel card's slot width is listed as OAM Module without dimensions.

Release timing places the Intel card on 2023-01-09 and the NVIDIA card on 2025-12-31. The Intel card's successor is listed as H3C Graphics, while the NVIDIA card has no successor. Both are marked as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS FP32, marginally ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 43.94 TFLOPS FP32. The difference is 0.5 TFLOPS, or approximately 1.1 percent.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The Intel card provides 2.46 TB/s bandwidth from 96 GB of HBM2e over an 8192-bit bus. The NVIDIA card provides 896.0 GB/s bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 over a 256-bit bus. Intel's bandwidth is roughly 2.75 times higher.

Q: What ray tracing capabilities does each card have?

A: The Intel card includes 112 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card includes 70 ray tracing cores. The Intel card also supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes additional ray tracing features.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor density?

A: The NVIDIA card achieves 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter on a 5 nm process, compared to Intel's 78.1 million per square millimeter on a 10 nm process. NVIDIA's density is approximately 54 percent higher.

Q: What display outputs are available on each card?

A: The Intel card has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for direct display connection. The NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scored 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It matches the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 6270 points, sits 0.2 percent behind the Quadro K620 at 6282 points, leads the FirePro W600 by 0.8 percent at 6223 points, and trails the Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9 percent at 6327 points.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Generation 12.5 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | 100,000 million | 45,600 million |

| Die size | 1280 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor density | 78.1M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base clock | 750 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost clock | 1550 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory clock | 1200 MHz, 2.4 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 96 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | 8192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 2.46 TB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 14336 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 896 | 280 |

| ROPs | 0 | 96 |

| RT cores | 112 | 70 |

| Tensor cores | None | 280 |

| Pixel rate | 0 MPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 1,388.8 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 44.44 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 44.44 TFLOPS (1:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 450 W | 350 W |

| Slot width | OAM Module | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None listed | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 850 W | None listed |

| Display outputs | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| DirectX support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan support | None listed | 1.4 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm |

| Release date | 2023-01-09 | 2025-12-31 |

The GPU frequencies differ substantially. NVIDIA's base clock of 2295 MHz is 3.06 times Intel's 750 MHz, and NVIDIA's boost of 2452 MHz is 1.58 times Intel's 1550 MHz. These clock advantages partially offset NVIDIA's lower shader count and smaller memory bus. The Intel card compensates with 1.6 times more shading units and 3.2 times more TMUs, though its zero ROP count eliminates any pixel fill advantage.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two cards with nearly identical FP32 throughput but fundamentally different design goals. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 pairs 44.44 TFLOPS with 96 GB of HBM2e memory and 2.46 TB/s bandwidth, built for data center workloads that require enormous memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 450 W TDP and OAM Module form factor target rack-mounted deployments, and the absence of display outputs confirms its compute-only role. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER pairs 43.94 TFLOPS with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, packaged as a dual-slot PCIe card with four display outputs, a 350 W TDP, and a single 16-pin power connector.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's benchmark score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 sits at the 36th percentile, with nearest rivals all within 0.9 percent of its result. This indicates consistent performance around the 6270-point mark. The Intel card has no benchmark data, so its actual rendering performance cannot be assessed from the database. Its 50th percentile standing is derived from specifications only.

For compute workloads that demand massive memory capacity, the Intel card's 96 GB and 2.46 TB/s bandwidth are decisive advantages. For graphics output, the NVIDIA card is the only option with display connectivity and a recorded rendering benchmark. The Intel card's zero ROP count and 0 MPixel/s pixel rate eliminate it from rasterization tasks, while the NVIDIA card's 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96 ROPs confirm its graphics capability. The NVIDIA card's tensor cores and Vulkan 1.4 support add further graphics and compute flexibility, while the Intel card offers more ray tracing cores but no tensor cores and no Vulkan support.

The release dates place the Intel card in 2023 and the NVIDIA card in late 2025, with the Intel card's successor listed as H3C Graphics. The data suggests two different markets: the Intel card for memory-bound data center compute, and the NVIDIA card for graphics rendering and general GPU workloads. Users requiring display output or measured rendering performance should select the NVIDIA card based on its benchmark record. Users prioritizing memory capacity and bandwidth should consider the Intel card, provided the workload does not require rasterization or display connectivity.