Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast between these two accelerators. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no benchmark entries in the database, which means its average benchmark score is recorded as zero and it sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, by contrast, has nine recorded benchmark scores and an average of 35,435 points, placing it at the 80th percentile.

Since the Intel part carries no measured results, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 143,870 in Geekbench OpenCL and 139,213 in Geekbench Vulkan. In Passmark tests, its strongest showing is the G3D score of 24,004, followed by GPU Compute at 10,101. The DirectX legacy tests are lower: 259 in DirectX 9, 237 in DirectX 11, 151 in DirectX 10, and 102 in DirectX 12. The 2D score is 981.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile confirm its standing. The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 averages 35,520, which is 0.2% above the RTX part. The AMD Radeon Pro Duo averages 35,860, 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA T1000 averages 36,289, 2.4% higher. The NVIDIA A2 averages 34,690, which is 2.1% below the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile lands in a competitive cluster near the top of its range.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no nearest rivals listed and no wins recorded. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also has no head-to-head benchmark entries, so the database shows zero wins for either side. The absence of measured data for the Intel accelerator means no direct numerical comparison can be made from the recorded results. What can be compared are the architectural specifications, which diverge sharply.

Architecture Differences

The two parts come from different foundries and process nodes. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm process from TSMC. The Intel chip, codenamed Ponte Vecchio, is built on Generation 12.5 architecture and belongs to the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation. The NVIDIA chip, GB205, uses Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation.

Transistor counts differ by a factor of more than three. The Intel part packs 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 78.1 million per mm². The NVIDIA part has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, yielding a higher density of 118.3 million per mm². The Intel die is nearly five times larger in area.

Memory configurations are also far apart. The Intel accelerator carries 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus, with bandwidth of 2.46 TB/s and memory clock at 1200 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA mobile part has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, with bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s and memory clock at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Intel part offers eight times the capacity and more than three times the bandwidth, though the NVIDIA memory runs at a much higher effective data rate.

Compute resources follow the same pattern. The Intel part has 14,336 shading units, 896 texture mapping units, 112 ray tracing cores, and no ROPs. Its pixel rate is recorded as 0 MPixel/s, while its texture rate is 1,388.8 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 115.8 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 266.2 GTexel/s.

The Intel part has no tensor cores listed, while the NVIDIA part includes tensor cores, a key differentiator for AI workloads. Both parts deliver FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, but the magnitudes differ: the Intel accelerator reaches 44.44 TFLOPS in both, while the NVIDIA part reaches 17.04 TFLOPS in both.

Clock speeds show a different balance. The Intel part has a base clock of 750 MHz and a boost clock of 1550 MHz. The NVIDIA part has a base of 847 MHz and a boost of 1447 MHz. The NVIDIA base is higher, but the Intel boost is higher.

Power and physical design are opposites. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has a TDP of 450 W, uses an OAM Module slot width, and has a suggested PSU of 850 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed. The Intel part has no display outputs, while the NVIDIA part has outputs described as portable device dependent.

API support also differs. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan version listed. The NVIDIA part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release dates are about 26 months apart. The Intel part was released on January 9, 2023, and its successor is listed as H3C Graphics. The NVIDIA part was released on February 28, 2025, with its predecessor listed as GeForce 40 Mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 143,870 and Vulkan score of 139,213 demonstrate strong compute performance in cross-platform workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 24,004 indicates solid 3D rendering capability, and the GPU Compute score of 10,101 shows respectable general-purpose compute throughput.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins in raw specifications that matter for large-scale data center workloads. Its 96 GB of HBM2e memory dwarfs the 12 GB GDDR7 on the NVIDIA part, and its 2.46 TB/s bandwidth is more than three times the 672.0 GB/s available on the RTX part. The Intel part also has more than double the FP32 throughput at 44.44 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS, and more than double the texture rate at 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s.

The NVIDIA part wins on efficiency and portability. Its 60 W TDP is one-eighth of the Intel part's 450 W, and its IGP form factor with no power connectors contrasts with the OAM Module slot width and 850 W suggested PSU of the Intel part. The NVIDIA part also supports newer API features, including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which the Intel part does not list.

The tensor core presence on the NVIDIA part is a functional win for AI inference and training workloads, since the Intel part has no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part also has ROPs, enabling pixel output of 115.8 GPixel/s, while the Intel part is recorded at 0 MPixel/s, consistent with its lack of display outputs.

FAQ

Q: Why does the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 have no benchmark scores in the database?

A: The database lists no benchmarks for the Intel part, so its average benchmark score is recorded as zero and its percentile is 50. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has nine recorded benchmark scores with an average of 35,435 and a percentile of 80.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The nearest rivals are all within a narrow range. The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 averages 35,520 (0.2% above), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo averages 35,860 (1.2% above), the NVIDIA T1000 averages 36,289 (2.4% above), and the NVIDIA A2 averages 34,690 (2.1% below).

Q: Which part has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth from 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 672.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Does the Intel part support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel part lists 112 ray tracing cores. However, it has no tensor cores listed, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 184 tensor cores alongside 46 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power requirement difference?

A: The Intel part has a TDP of 450 W and a suggested PSU of 850 W. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which part supports newer graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan version listed.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in nearly every recorded specification field.

Process node: Intel uses 10 nm, NVIDIA uses 5 nm. Foundry: Intel uses Intel, NVIDIA uses TSMC.

Transistors: Intel has 100,000 million, NVIDIA has 31,100 million. Die size: Intel is 1280 mm², NVIDIA is 263 mm². Transistor density: Intel is 78.1M per mm², NVIDIA is 118.3M per mm².

Base clock: Intel is 750 MHz, NVIDIA is 847 MHz. Boost clock: Intel is 1550 MHz, NVIDIA is 1447 MHz. Memory clock: Intel is 1200 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective), NVIDIA is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Memory size: Intel has 96 GB, NVIDIA has 12 GB. Memory type: Intel uses HBM2e, NVIDIA uses GDDR7. Bus width: Intel is 8192 bit, NVIDIA is 192 bit. Bandwidth: Intel is 2.46 TB/s, NVIDIA is 672.0 GB/s.

Shading units: Intel has 14,336, NVIDIA has 5,888. TMUs: Intel has 896, NVIDIA has 184. ROPs: Intel has 0, NVIDIA has 80. Ray tracing cores: Intel has 112, NVIDIA has 46. Tensor cores: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA has 184.

Pixel rate: Intel is 0 MPixel/s, NVIDIA is 115.8 GPixel/s. Texture rate: Intel is 1,388.8 GTexel/s, NVIDIA is 266.2 GTexel/s. FP32: Intel is 44.44 TFLOPS, NVIDIA is 17.04 TFLOPS. FP16: both are 1:1, Intel at 44.44 TFLOPS and NVIDIA at 17.04 TFLOPS.

TDP: Intel is 450 W, NVIDIA is 60 W. Slot width: Intel is OAM Module, NVIDIA is IGP. Power connectors: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA has none. Suggested PSU: Intel is 850 W, NVIDIA has none listed.

Bus interface: both use PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: Intel has no outputs, NVIDIA has portable device dependent outputs.

DirectX support: Intel is 12 (12_1), NVIDIA is 12 Ultimate (12_2). OpenGL: both are 4.6. Vulkan: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA has 1.4.

Release date: Intel is January 9, 2023, NVIDIA is February 28, 2025. Predecessor: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA has GeForce 40 Mobile. Successor: Intel has H3C Graphics, NVIDIA has none listed.

The Verdict

The data indicates two different products for two different roles. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a high-power, high-memory accelerator with 96 GB of HBM2e, 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth, and 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. Its 450 W TDP, OAM Module form factor, and lack of display outputs position it for server racks and data center compute tasks. It has no benchmark scores in the database, so its measured performance cannot be verified against the RTX part.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a low-power mobile GPU with measured results across multiple benchmarks. Its average score of 35,435 and 80th percentile rank place it among capable GPUs, with nearest rivals within 2.4% either way. Its 60 W TDP, IGP form factor, and portable device dependent display outputs make it suitable for laptops and mobile workstations.

The choice depends on the workload. For large memory footprints and raw FP32 throughput in a data center context, the Intel part offers specifications that the NVIDIA part cannot match. For measured benchmark performance, API coverage, tensor core support, and power efficiency in a mobile context, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only part with recorded evidence.

The database shows no wins for either side in head-to-head benchmarks, because no such benchmarks are recorded. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has all nine benchmark scores, while the Intel part has none. Any decision between these two should rest on the fact that one has verified performance data and the other does not.