Intel Arc Pro B70 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc Pro B70

CORE STATE BMG-G31
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2800 MHz
TDP 230 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe2-HPG
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD102
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2550 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
N/A
175,286
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
194,041

Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B70 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Pro B70 and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The Intel card has no recorded benchmark scores, while the NVIDIA card has two entries: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041. Its average benchmark score across those tests is 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits close to several high-end rivals in the recorded data. It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which averages 183,725. It trails the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 1.3%, that card averaging 187,147. It leads the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 1.4%, which averages 182,109, and it beats the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7%, which averages 178,050. These margins are narrow, indicating that the RTX 5000 Ada Generation performs at the upper tier of the database’s recorded results.

For the Intel Arc Pro B70, the percentile rank is 50, with an average benchmark score of 0 due to the absence of any recorded tests. This means the database cannot currently place it relative to the RTX 5000 Ada Generation in direct computation. The only quantitative comparison available comes from the specification sheets, discussed in later sections.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmark data, wins must be assessed from the recorded specifications and the NVIDIA card’s measured performance.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation clearly wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rating is 65.28 TFLOPS, which is 2.85 times the Intel Arc Pro B70’s 22.94 TFLOPS. Its FP16 rating is 65.28 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel card delivers 45.88 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card also has more shading units: 12,800 versus 4,096. Texture rate favors NVIDIA at 1,020.0 GTexel/s versus 716.8 GTexel/s, and pixel rate favors NVIDIA at 448.8 GPixel/s versus 358.4 GPixel/s.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation also holds the advantage in ray tracing and tensor hardware. It has 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores. The Intel card lists 32 RT cores and no tensor core count. For workloads that use these dedicated units, the NVIDIA card is the stronger option based on the recorded data.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 wins in memory bandwidth. It delivers 608.0 GB/s versus the NVIDIA card’s 576.0 GB/s, a margin of about 5.6%. The Intel card also runs a higher boost clock: 2,800 MHz versus 2,550 MHz, and a higher base clock: 2,280 MHz versus 1,155 MHz. The Intel card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which gives the Intel part a newer bus standard.

In display connectivity, the Intel Arc Pro B70 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel card supports a newer DisplayPort standard, which matters for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution monitors that rely on DisplayPort 2.1 features.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average is 0 and its percentile is 50.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: It is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725), 1.3% behind the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147), 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109), and 3.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050).

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 608.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 576.0 GB/s. Both cards have 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two cards?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation delivers 65.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is 2.85 times the Intel Arc Pro B70’s 22.94 TFLOPS.

Q: Which card has more RT cores and tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 32 RT cores and no tensor core count listed in the database.

Q: What are the release dates for these two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 is dated March 25, 2026. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is dated August 8, 2023.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in several recorded fields. The Intel Arc Pro B70 uses a base clock of 2,280 MHz and a boost clock of 2,800 MHz. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses a base clock of 1,155 MHz and a boost clock of 2,550 MHz. The Intel card’s memory runs at 2,375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective, while the NVIDIA card runs at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Shading units differ: 4,096 on the Intel card versus 12,800 on the NVIDIA card. Texture mapping units are 256 versus 400, and render output units are 128 versus 176. The RT core count is 32 versus 100, and the tensor core count is not listed for Intel but is 400 for NVIDIA.

FP32 performance is 22.94 TFLOPS versus 65.28 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 45.88 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1). Pixel rate is 358.4 GPixel/s versus 448.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 716.8 GTexel/s versus 1,020.0 GTexel/s.

The power draw is 230 W for the Intel card and 250 W for the NVIDIA card. The Intel card uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, while the NVIDIA card uses a 1x 16-pin connector. The suggested power supply is 550 W for Intel and 600 W for NVIDIA. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for Intel and PCIe 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA.

Display outputs differ: Intel provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while NVIDIA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The launch MSRP for the Intel Arc Pro B70 is 949 USD; the NVIDIA card has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B70 is built on the BMG-G31 chip using the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 368 mm². The transistor count is listed as unknown.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on the AD102 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, from the Workstation Ada generation. It is also fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the die size is 609 mm². The transistor count is 76,300 million, and the transistor density is 125.3M per mm².

The Intel card has no recorded tensor core count, while the NVIDIA card has 400 tensor cores. The NVIDIA card’s predecessor is Workstation Ampere, and its successor is Blackwell PRO W. The Intel card has no predecessor or successor listed.

The NVIDIA card’s production status is listed as Active, while the Intel card has no production status recorded. The two cards share the same DirectX version (12 Ultimate with 12_2), OpenGL version (4.6), and Vulkan version (1.4).

The Verdict

The recorded data does not allow a direct performance comparison between the Intel Arc Pro B70 and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation, since the Intel card has no benchmark scores. What the database does show is that the NVIDIA card sits at the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 184,664, and that it outperforms or closely matches several high-end rivals.

For compute-heavy workloads, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the clear choice from the specifications. Its FP32 output of 65.28 TFLOPS is nearly three times the Intel card’s 22.94 TFLOPS. It also has over three times the shading units, more texture units, more render output units, and a dedicated tensor core count of 400. The NVIDIA card’s 100 RT cores versus 32 on the Intel card also favors NVIDIA for ray-traced rendering.

For bandwidth-sensitive tasks, the Intel Arc Pro B70 holds a modest edge with 608.0 GB/s versus 576.0 GB/s. Its higher boost clock of 2,800 MHz and newer PCIe 5.0 interface are also points in its favor. The Intel card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is a newer standard than the NVIDIA card’s DisplayPort 1.4a.

The database’s percentile ranking reflects this split: the NVIDIA card is at the 98th percentile, the Intel card at the 50th. That difference is derived from benchmark results for NVIDIA and the absence of results for Intel. Buyers who need proven high-end compute performance should look at the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation based on the recorded scores. Buyers who need the highest memory bandwidth and a newer display interface, and who are willing to accept a lower compute ceiling, would look at the Intel Arc Pro B70. The data cannot confirm the Intel card’s real-world performance until benchmark scores are recorded.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro B70
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,096
12,800 +212.5%
Shaders
4,096
12,800 +212.5%
TMUs
256
400 +56.3%
ROPs
128
176 +37.5%
SM Count
100
Execution Units
32
Clocks
Base Clock
2280 MHz
1155 MHz
Boost Clock
2800 MHz
2550 MHz
Memory Clock
2375 MHz 19 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
32,768 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
608.0 GB/s
576.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
24 MB
72 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
358.4 GPixel/s
448.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
716.8 GTexel/s
1,020.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
22.94 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS (1:8)
1,020.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
45.88 TFLOPS (2:1)
65.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
100 +212.5%
Tensor Cores
400
XMX Cores
256
Power
TDP
230 W
250 W
TDP (W)
230
250 +8.7%
Suggested PSU
550 W
600 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe2-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
BMG-G31
AD102
Generation
Battlemage (Pro Series)
Workstation Ada (x000A)
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
76,300 million
Die Size
368 mm²
609 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
125.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
110 mm 4.3 inches
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
949 USD
Production
Active
Predecessor
Workstation Ampere
Successor
Blackwell PRO W
View Arc Pro B70 Details View RTX 5000 Ada Generation Details