Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs NVIDIA RTX A400 Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and NVIDIA RTX A400 sit at opposite ends of the workstation GPU spectrum. The Intel card is a large, power-hungry, high-capacity accelerator aimed at compute-heavy professional tasks, while the NVIDIA card is a compact, low-power entry-level solution for basic workstation duties. The recorded data shows a clear division: the Arc Pro B60 Dual targets serious workloads with massive memory and throughput, whereas the RTX A400 offers a minimal footprint and modest performance for simpler environments.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in every category that demands raw compute throughput and large memory capacity. Its shading unit count of 2560, texture mapping units at 160, and render output units at 80 dwarf the RTX A400's 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. This translates to a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 28.19 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s versus 42.29 GTexel/s. The Intel card also delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance compared to 2.706 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card, making it over 4.5 times faster in raw single-precision math.

The RTX A400 wins in size, power draw, and installation flexibility. It is a single-slot card measuring 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height, with no power connectors required and a 50 W TDP. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a dual-slot card at 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, requiring a 1x 16-pin connector and a 400 W TDP. For systems with tight chassis constraints or limited power delivery, the RTX A400 is the only viable option of the two.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different process nodes and architectures. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip on the Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The NVIDIA RTX A400 uses the GA107 chip on the Ampere architecture, produced on Samsung's 8 nm process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5 million per mm².

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The Intel card has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card's memory clock runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the NVIDIA card runs at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The Intel card also uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, compared to PCIe 4.0 x8 on the NVIDIA card.

Feature sets differ in ray tracing and tensor capabilities. The Intel card has 20 ray tracing cores and no dedicated tensor cores listed, while the NVIDIA card has 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 on the Intel card versus 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a on the NVIDIA card.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards. However, the RTX A400 has individual benchmark scores recorded, and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark entries at all. This absence of measured data for the Intel card limits direct comparison, but the architectural specifications provide a reliable basis for expected performance.

The RTX A400 scores 22844 in Geekbench OpenCL and 22237 in Geekbench Vulkan. In Passmark tests, it scores 5983 in G3D, 2557 in GPU compute, 899 in G2D, 87 in DirectX 9, 37 in DirectX 11, 32 in DirectX 10, and 27 in DirectX 12. Its average benchmark score is 6078, placing it at the 35th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The RTX A400's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 with an average score of 6077 and a delta of 0%, the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 at 6049 with a delta of 0.5%, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 at 6117 with a delta of -0.6%, and the AMD Radeon 760M at 6019 with a delta of 1%. This places the RTX A400 in a performance tier similar to low-end mobile graphics and older workstation parts.

Given the Intel card's FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS, which is 4.54 times the RTX A400's 2.706 TFLOPS, the Intel card would be expected to deliver substantially higher frame rates and compute results in any workload that scales with raw shading power. The 24 GB memory capacity also allows datasets that would completely exhaust the RTX A400's 4 GB allocation.

The Verdict

The data points to two distinct buyer profiles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is for professionals who need large memory capacity and high compute throughput for tasks like rendering, simulation, or AI inference where the 24 GB frame buffer and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance are critical. Its 400 W TDP and dual-slot footprint require a workstation with robust power delivery and chassis space, plus a suggested 800 W PSU.

The NVIDIA RTX A400 is for environments where size and power are the primary constraints. Its 50 W TDP, single-slot design, and no power connector requirement make it suitable for compact systems or those with limited power budgets. Its 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB memory are sufficient for basic 2D workstation tasks, light 3D visualization, or as a display adapter for multi-monitor setups.

The RTX A400's benchmark performance, with an average score of 6078 and a 35th percentile ranking, places it near the bottom of the database's GPU population. The Intel card, with no benchmark scores recorded and a 50th percentile ranking, sits in the middle of the distribution. Buyers should choose based on workload requirements, not on raw numbers alone, since the Intel card's specifications suggest it will dominate in compute-heavy scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA RTX A400 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector with a suggested 800 W PSU. The NVIDIA RTX A400 has a 50 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and has a suggested 250 W PSU.

Q: Which card has better FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is approximately 4.5 times higher than the NVIDIA RTX A400's 2.706 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual measures 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, occupying a dual-slot width. The NVIDIA RTX A400 measures 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height, with a single-slot width.

Q: Does the RTX A400 have tensor cores?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA RTX A400 has 24 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no tensor cores listed in its specifications, but it does have 20 ray tracing cores compared to 6 on the NVIDIA card.

Q: What is the RTX A400's benchmark standing?

A: The RTX A400 has an average benchmark score of 6078, placing it at the 35th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX230 with a score of 6077 and a 0% delta.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual | NVIDIA RTX A400 |

|-------|------------------------|-----------------|

| Chip | BMG-G21 | GA107 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | Ampere |

| Generation | Battlemage (Pro Series) | Workstation Ampere (Ax000) |

| Process Node | 5 nm (TSMC) | 8 nm (Samsung) |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | 8,700 million |

| Die Size | 272 mm² | 200 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | 43.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | 1417 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 1762 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 24 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 456.0 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 768 |

| TMUs | 160 | 24 |

| ROPs | 80 | 16 |

| RT Cores | 20 | 6 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 24 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 28.19 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 384.0 GTexel/s | 42.29 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 12.29 TFLOPS | 2.706 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 400 W | 50 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 800 W | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions (LxHxW) | 300 mm x 110 mm x 40 mm | 163 mm x 69 mm x N/A |

| Release Date | 2025-09-04 | 2024-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | 1,199 USD | None |