Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs NVIDIA H800 SXM5 Comparison
Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual
H800 SXM5
Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs NVIDIA H800 SXM5
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark database contains no recorded head-to-head comparisons between the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and the NVIDIA H800 SXM5. Both GPUs have an empty benchmark result set, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs in the database. This means the two products cannot be ranked against each other using measured performance data. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and the NVIDIA H800 SXM5 occupy entirely different market segments, which is reflected in their architectural and specification profiles. Without benchmark scores, the analysis must rely on the recorded hardware characteristics to establish relative capability.
The absence of benchmark data does not imply equivalence. The H800 SXM5 targets server compute workloads, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual is a professional graphics card for workstations. The database shows zero wins for either product in the head-to-head category, so no direct performance conclusions can be drawn from test results. The specification sheets, however, reveal substantial differences in compute throughput, memory capacity, and interface design, which provide a basis for qualitative comparison.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?
A: The NVIDIA H800 SXM5 delivers 59.30 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 12.29 TFLOPS. The H800 SXM5 is approximately 4.8 times faster in single-precision floating-point operations based on these recorded figures.
Q: What are the memory capacities and bandwidths?
A: The H800 SXM5 has 80 GB of HBM3 memory with a 5120-bit bus and 3.36 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The H800 SXM5 offers over seven times the memory bandwidth.
Q: Which card has more shading units and texture mapping units?
A: The H800 SXM5 has 16,896 shading units and 528 TMUs. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units and 160 TMUs. The H800 SXM5 also includes 528 tensor cores, whereas the Arc Pro B60 Dual lists no tensor core count.
Q: How do the power requirements compare?
A: The H800 SXM5 has a TDP of 700 W and requires a suggested 1100 W PSU with an 8-pin EPS connector. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W and a suggested 800 W PSU with a 1x 16-pin connector.
Q: Which GPU supports display outputs?
A: Only the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has display outputs: four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connectors. The NVIDIA H800 SXM5 has no display outputs, confirming its server-oriented design.
Q: What is the release timeline for each product?
A: The H800 SXM5 was released on 2023-03-20, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual was released on 2025-09-04. The H800 SXM5 predates the Arc Pro B60 Dual by over two years.
Architecture Differences
The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture using the BMG-G21 chip, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it a full-featured graphics solution for professional rendering and compute tasks.
The NVIDIA H800 SXM5 uses the Hopper architecture with the GH100 chip, belonging to the Server Hopper (Hxx) generation. It is also fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process, but with 80,000 million transistors on an 814 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 98.3M per mm². The Hopper design is server-focused and omits display outputs entirely. It has 528 tensor cores, which are absent from the Arc Pro B60 Dual specification list, and its API support fields for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan are null, indicating the card is not intended for consumer graphics APIs.
The H800 SXM5 uses HBM3 memory with a 5120-bit interface, whereas the Arc Pro B60 Dual uses GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The H800 SXM5 has no listed RT cores, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual includes 20 RT cores. The two GPUs also differ in form factor: the Arc Pro B60 Dual is a dual-slot PCIe card, while the H800 SXM5 is an SXM module, a board-mount form factor for server chassis.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The H800 SXM5 has a base clock of 1095 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory at 1313 MHz (5.3 Gbps effective). The Arc Pro B60 Dual runs at higher clock speeds, but the H800 SXM5 compensates with vastly more compute units and wider memory.
Memory capacity: 24 GB GDDR6 versus 80 GB HBM3. Bus width: 192 bit versus 5120 bit. Bandwidth: 456.0 GB/s versus 3.36 TB/s. The H800 SXM5 has 16,896 shading units, 528 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. Pixel rate: 192.0 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro B60 Dual versus 42.12 GPixel/s for the H800 SXM5. Texture rate: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 926.6 GTexel/s. FP16 performance: 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Arc Pro B60 Dual versus 237.2 TFLOPS (4:1) for the H800 SXM5.
Power: 400 W TDP with 800 W suggested PSU for the Arc Pro B60 Dual; 700 W TDP with 1100 W suggested PSU for the H800 SXM5. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD, while the H800 SXM5 has no recorded launch MSRP. The H800 SXM5 lists its predecessor as Server Ada and successor as Server Blackwell, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual lists neither.
The Verdict
The recorded data shows two products with no shared benchmark results, so a direct performance verdict cannot be established. The NVIDIA H800 SXM5 is clearly designed for high-throughput compute workloads, with 80 GB of HBM3 memory, 3.36 TB/s bandwidth, 59.30 TFLOPS FP32, and 237.2 TFLOPS FP16. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a professional graphics card with display outputs, 24 GB GDDR6, 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16, built for workstation rendering and graphics tasks.
The H800 SXM5 has no display outputs and no consumer API support, confirming its role in server environments. The Arc Pro B60 Dual supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and includes four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The H800 SXM5 has tensor cores for AI acceleration, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual has RT cores for ray tracing. The choice between these GPUs depends entirely on the workload: the H800 SXM5 for large-scale compute and AI training, the Arc Pro B60 Dual for graphics-oriented professional use.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in display connectivity, offering four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the H800 SXM5 has none. The Arc Pro B60 Dual also has a higher pixel rate at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 42.12 GPixel/s, making it better suited for rasterization-heavy graphics work. Its 80 ROPs, double the H800 SXM5's 24, further supports traditional rendering pipelines. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a lower TDP of 400 W versus 700 W, and a lower suggested PSU of 800 W versus 1100 W, which simplifies system integration. It also has a higher boost clock of 2400 MHz versus 1755 MHz.
The NVIDIA H800 SXM5 wins decisively in raw compute throughput. FP32 performance is 59.30 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS, a 4.8x advantage. FP16 performance is 237.2 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a 9.6x advantage. Memory bandwidth is 3.36 TB/s versus 456.0 GB/s, a 7.4x advantage. Memory capacity is 80 GB versus 24 GB. Texture rate is 926.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. The H800 SXM5 has 528 tensor cores for AI workloads, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual has none listed. The H800 SXM5 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus x8 on the Arc Pro B60 Dual, doubling the available host bandwidth.
The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a release date of 2025-09-04, making it a newer product, but the H800 SXM5's predecessor and successor entries show an established product lineage. The H800 SXM5 has 16,896 shading units versus 2,560, giving it a massive advantage in parallel compute. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 20 RT cores, which the H800 SXM5 lacks, indicating a focus on ray-traced rendering. The H800 SXM5 is a server module with no dimensions recorded, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual is a 300 mm long, 110 mm high, 40 mm wide dual-slot card.