Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs NVIDIA H100 CNX Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core architectural differences between the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and the NVIDIA H100 CNX?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The NVIDIA H100 CNX uses the GH100 chip based on Hopper architecture, also on a 5 nm TSMC process, but with 80,000 million transistors on an 814 mm² die. The H100 CNX has a higher transistor density at 98.3M per mm² versus 72.1M per mm² for the Intel part.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA H100 CNX has 80 GB of HBM2e memory on a 5120-bit bus, delivering 2.04 TB/s bandwidth. The H100 CNX provides over four times the bandwidth and more than three times the capacity.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W and requires a suggested 800 W PSU, using a 1x 16-pin power connector. The NVIDIA H100 CNX has a TDP of 350 W with a suggested 750 W PSU, using an 8-pin EPS connector. Despite lower power consumption, the H100 CNX delivers substantially higher compute throughput.

Q: Which card has higher raw FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA H100 CNX delivers 53.84 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is over four times the 12.29 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. In FP16, the gap widens further: the H100 CNX reaches 215.4 TFLOPS (4:1) versus 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Intel card.

Q: Do both cards support display outputs?

A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual includes 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, making it suitable for workstation display tasks. The NVIDIA H100 CNX has no display outputs, reflecting its server-oriented design where rendering to a screen is not required.

Q: What is the release timeline for these products?

A: The NVIDIA H100 CNX was released on 2023-03-20, with its predecessor listed as Server Ada and successor as Server Blackwell. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual was released on 2025-09-04, with no predecessor or successor listed. Both are currently marked as Active in production status.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual and NVIDIA H100 CNX represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel part is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture under the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation, while the NVIDIA card uses the Hopper architecture under the Server Hopper (Hxx) generation.

The chip designs diverge sharply. Intel's BMG-G21 packs 19,600 million transistors into a 272 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². NVIDIA's GH100 integrates 80,000 million transistors across an 814 mm² die, achieving 98.3M per mm². The H100 CNX is both physically larger and more densely packed.

Compute resource allocation differs significantly. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, plus 20 dedicated RT cores. The NVIDIA H100 CNX has 14,592 shading units, 456 TMUs, and only 24 ROPs, with 456 tensor cores and no dedicated RT core count listed. This allocation reflects different priorities: Intel balances rasterization and ray tracing, while NVIDIA concentrates on tensor-heavy server workloads.

Clock behavior also differs. The Intel card runs at a 2000 MHz base clock boosting to 2400 MHz, with memory at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA card has a much lower 690 MHz base clock but boosts to 1845 MHz, with memory at 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective). The lower base clock on the H100 CNX suggests a power-conscious design that relies on boost behavior under load.

Memory architecture shows a stark contrast. The Intel card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus for 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 80 GB of HBM2e on a 5120-bit bus for 2.04 TB/s bandwidth. The HBM2e implementation provides a 4.47x bandwidth advantage and 3.33x capacity advantage. The bus width difference is particularly notable: 5120-bit versus 192-bit.

API support separates the two as well. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it suitable for graphics workloads. The NVIDIA H100 CNX lists no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan support in the database, consistent with its compute-focused server role.

Physical design differs in several respects. The Intel card measures 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The NVIDIA card is shorter at 267 mm, slightly taller at 111 mm, with no width listed. Both are dual-slot cards. The Intel card uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16, providing the latter with twice the bus bandwidth for host communication.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA H100 CNX dominates in raw compute throughput across the board. Its FP32 performance of 53.84 TFLOPS is 4.38x higher than the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16, the H100 CNX achieves 215.4 TFLOPS (4:1), which is 8.76x the Intel card's 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1). The texture rate also favors NVIDIA: 841.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 2.19x advantage.

Memory bandwidth is another clear win for the NVIDIA card. With 2.04 TB/s against 456.0 GB/s, the H100 CNX provides 4.47x more bandwidth. The 80 GB capacity versus 24 GB gives it a 3.33x memory capacity advantage, which matters for large model residency in server workloads.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in pixel throughput. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 4.34x higher than the H100 CNX's 44.28 GPixel/s. This reflects the Intel card's 80 ROPs versus only 24 on the NVIDIA part. For rasterization-heavy tasks, the Intel design has a structural advantage.

The Intel card also wins on display capabilities. It provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the NVIDIA H100 CNX offers none. Any workload requiring direct display output, such as workstation visualization, must use the Intel card. The NVIDIA card is strictly a compute accelerator with no video output path.

The Intel card additionally offers lower base clock requirements for sustained operation. Its 2000 MHz base clock versus 690 MHz on the NVIDIA card means the Intel part maintains higher baseline throughput without relying on boost states. However, the NVIDIA card's boost clock of 1845 MHz partially compensates during active compute phases.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual | NVIDIA H100 CNX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G21 | GH100 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | Hopper |

| Generation | Battlemage (Pro Series) | Server Hopper (Hxx) |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | 80,000 million |

| Die Size | 272 mm² | 814 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | 98.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | 690 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 1845 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 1593 MHz (3.2 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 24 GB | 80 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 5120 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 456.0 GB/s | 2.04 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 14592 |

| TMUs | 160 | 456 |

| ROPs | 80 | 24 |

| RT Cores | 20 | Not listed |

| Tensor Cores | Not listed | 456 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 44.28 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 384.0 GTexel/s | 841.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 12.29 TFLOPS | 53.84 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 215.4 TFLOPS (4:1) |

| TDP | 400 W | 350 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | 8-pin EPS |

| Suggested PSU | 800 W | 750 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 | No outputs |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | Not listed |

| OpenGL Support | 4.6 | Not listed |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | Not listed |

| Length | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |

| Height | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 111 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | Not listed |

| Release Date | 2025-09-04 | 2023-03-20 |

| Launch MSRP | 1,199 USD | Not listed |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark entries, and both cards have an average benchmark score of 0 with a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs. The wins tally is 0 for each side. However, the specification data provides a basis for comparative analysis.

The largest performance gap appears in FP16 compute. The NVIDIA H100 CNX delivers 215.4 TFLOPS (4:1) versus 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual, a difference of 190.82 TFLOPS. This 8.76x advantage makes the H100 CNX particularly suited for workloads that leverage FP16 tensor operations, such as deep learning training and inference.

FP32 compute shows a 4.38x advantage for NVIDIA. The H100 CNX achieves 53.84 TFLOPS against 12.29 TFLOPS for the Intel card, a difference of 41.55 TFLOPS. This gap matters for scientific computing and simulation workloads that rely on single-precision arithmetic.

Memory bandwidth presents a 4.47x gap. The H100 CNX delivers 2.04 TB/s versus 456.0 GB/s for the Intel card, a difference of 1.584 TB/s. For memory-bound workloads such as large matrix operations or data-intensive analytics, this bandwidth advantage can translate directly into faster execution.

Texture rate favors NVIDIA by 2.19x. The H100 CNX achieves 841.3 GTexel/s against 384.0 GTexel/s for the Intel card, a difference of 457.3 GTexel/s. This benefits texture-heavy graphics workloads, though the H100 CNX lacks display outputs, limiting its practical use in such scenarios.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual holds advantages in pixel rate and ROP count. Its 192.0 GPixel/s is 4.34x the H100 CNX's 44.28 GPixel/s, a difference of 147.72 GPixel/s. The 80 ROPs versus 24 ROPs gives the Intel card a structural edge in rasterization-bound rendering, where pixel throughput is the limiting factor.

The Intel card also leads in clock behavior. Its base clock of 2000 MHz is 2.90x the H100 CNX's 690 MHz, and its boost clock of 2400 MHz is 1.30x the NVIDIA part's 1845 MHz. Higher sustained clocks can benefit latency-sensitive workloads that do not scale perfectly with parallelism.

The Verdict

The data indicates two cards designed for different roles with minimal overlap. The NVIDIA H100 CNX is a server compute accelerator with massive FP32 and FP16 throughput, 80 GB of HBM2e memory, and 2.04 TB/s bandwidth. Its 53.84 TFLOPS FP32 and 215.4 TFLOPS FP16 performance, combined with 456 tensor cores, position it for compute-heavy server deployments. The lack of display outputs confirms this purpose.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a workstation graphics card with display output capability. Its 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate make it suitable for visualization and graphics-intensive tasks. The 24 GB GDDR6 memory and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate capacity for professional rendering workloads.

For users requiring server-side compute acceleration, particularly in AI or scientific computing, the NVIDIA H100 CNX is the clear choice based on its 4.38x FP32 and 8.76x FP16 advantages. The 80 GB memory capacity and 2.04 TB/s bandwidth support large models and datasets that would exceed the Intel card's 24 GB capacity.

For workstation use requiring display output, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is the only option between these two, as the H100 CNX has no display paths. The Intel card's higher pixel rate and ROP count also favor rasterization-heavy workloads. Its launch MSRP of 1,199 USD provides a reference point, though the database lists no equivalent for the H100 CNX.

The release timeline also matters. The NVIDIA H100 CNX launched on 2023-03-20 with Server Ada as predecessor and Server Blackwell as successor. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual launched on 2025-09-04 with no predecessor or successor listed. The newer Intel card targets a different market segment than the established NVIDIA server part.

Both cards carry 400 W and 350 W TDPs respectively, with suggested PSUs of 800 W and 750 W. The NVIDIA card achieves higher performance at lower power, indicating better compute efficiency per watt. The Intel card uses a 16-pin connector while NVIDIA uses 8-pin EPS, which may affect system integration choices.

The physical dimensions differ modestly. The Intel card is longer at 300 mm versus 267 mm, while the NVIDIA card is marginally taller at 111 mm versus 110 mm. The Intel card has a 40 mm width; no width is listed for the NVIDIA part. Both are dual-slot designs.

In summary, the recorded specifications show the NVIDIA H100 CNX as the dominant compute performer with 4x or greater advantages in FP32, FP16, memory bandwidth, and texture rate. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual excels in pixel rate, ROP count, display output support, and clock speeds. The choice between them depends entirely on whether the workload demands compute throughput or graphics output capabilities.