Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two GPUs into very different usage profiles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a professional workstation card with no benchmark entries in the database, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile carries nine recorded benchmark scores across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads. The Intel part’s percentile ranking sits at 50, meaning half of all GPUs in the database score above it by this measure. The NVIDIA mobile part ranks at the 81st percentile, placing it well inside the upper quintile of all recorded GPUs.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins on pure memory capacity and bandwidth. It ships with 24 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, yielding 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB on the same 192-bit bus width, with 432.0 GB/s. That difference matters for large datasets, high-resolution textures, or workloads where memory footprint exceeds 12 GB. The Intel card also carries a 400 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, and a 16-pin power connector, which positions it for desktop workstations with substantial power delivery. The NVIDIA part is an integrated mobile GPU at 110 W with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs.

The NVIDIA part wins decisively on raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rating of 24.72 TFLOPS doubles the Intel card’s 12.29 TFLOPS. The RTX 4080 Mobile also has 7424 shading units against 2560, 232 TMUs against 160, and 58 RT cores against 20. Texture rate sits close, 386.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, but pixel rate favors Intel at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 133.2 GPixel/s. The NVIDIA part also has 232 tensor cores, while the Intel part has no tensor core count listed.

Benchmark wins all belong to the NVIDIA part because no benchmark scores exist for the Intel card. The RTX 4080 Mobile records a PassMark G3D score of 24926, a GPU compute score of 11191, and Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 159575 and 145807 respectively. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 38135. The Intel part’s average benchmark score is 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different architectures, nodes, and design philosophies. Intel’s Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. NVIDIA’s RTX 4080 Mobile uses the AD104 chip on Ada Lovelace, part of the GeForce 40 Mobile generation. Both are built on 5 nm at TSMC, but the transistor counts diverge sharply. The NVIDIA chip packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, while the Intel chip has 19,600 million on a 272 mm² die. Transistor density consequently favors NVIDIA at 121.8M per mm² versus 72.1M per mm².

Clock behavior differs substantially. The Intel card has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz. The RTX 4080 Mobile runs a 1290 MHz base and 1665 MHz boost. Despite the lower clocks, the NVIDIA part achieves higher FP32 throughput because it has nearly three times the shading units. Memory clocks are close: the Intel part runs 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective, while the NVIDIA part runs 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem shows a key architectural split. Both use GDDR6 over a 192-bit bus, but Intel allocates 24 GB while NVIDIA allocates 12 GB. Bandwidth favors Intel slightly, 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 4080 Mobile carries 232 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads, and its FP16 throughput matches FP32 at 24.72 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part’s FP16 rating is 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning it halves FP32 throughput to reach that number.

Interface and power delivery differ completely. The Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the NVIDIA mobile part uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Intel card is dual-slot, 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, with four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The NVIDIA part is an IGP form factor with no listed dimensions and portable-device-dependent display output. Power draw is 400 W for Intel with a suggested 800 W PSU, versus 110 W for NVIDIA with no PSU suggestion. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release timing also separates them. The RTX 4080 Mobile launched on 2023-01-02, with the GeForce 30 Mobile as predecessor and GeForce 50 Mobile as successor. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual launched on 2025-09-04 with no predecessor or successor listed. The Intel card has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The NVIDIA part has no launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database. The wins counter shows 0 for both parts, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. The comparison therefore relies on the NVIDIA part’s recorded scores and the Intel part’s architectural specifications.

The RTX 4080 Mobile’s strongest recorded result is Geekbench OpenCL at 159575. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 145807. In PassMark tests, the DirectX 11 score of 244 beats DirectX 10 at 157, DirectX 12 at 96, and DirectX 9 at 286. The G2D score is 929, and the G3D score is 24926. GPU compute scores 11191. The average benchmark score across all tests is 38135.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4080 Mobile sits within a tight cluster. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38299, a delta of -0.4 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38349, a delta of -0.6 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 scores 37648, a delta of 1.3 percent. The NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628, a delta of 1.3 percent. The RTX 4080 Mobile is effectively at parity with all four, trailing the MX570 and RTX 5080 Mobile by less than one percent and leading the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4 by just over one percent.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark scores to compare. Its architectural figures, however, show where it would compete. The 24 GB memory capacity and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth exceed the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 12 GB and 432.0 GB/s. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s also exceeds the NVIDIA part’s 133.2 GPixel/s. But the FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS is roughly half the NVIDIA part’s 24.72 TFLOPS, and the shading unit count is less than a third. The RT core count of 20 versus 58 indicates weaker ray tracing throughput.

The percentile data reinforces this split. The RTX 4080 Mobile sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel card sits at the 50th percentile. The average benchmark score difference is stark: 38135 for NVIDIA versus 0 for Intel, though that zero reflects missing data rather than measured performance.

The Verdict

The database shows two GPUs aimed at different tasks with no overlapping benchmark results. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the measured performer. Its recorded scores place it at the 81st percentile, with an average benchmark score of 38135 and strong results in Geekbench OpenCL, Geekbench Vulkan, and PassMark G3D. Its nearest rivals, the MX570 and RTX 5080 Mobile, sit within one percent, confirming that the RTX 4080 Mobile operates in a competitive performance band. Users who need proven DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, or compute performance should select the NVIDIA part based strictly on the recorded data.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual offers architectural advantages that the benchmarks do not cover. Its 24 GB memory capacity doubles the NVIDIA part, and its 456.0 GB/s bandwidth edges out the 432.0 GB/s of the RTX 4080 Mobile. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 44 percent higher than the NVIDIA part’s 133.2 GPixel/s. The dual-slot desktop form factor, PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs suit a fixed workstation environment. The 400 W TDP and 800 W suggested PSU indicate a power-hungry but expandable platform.

The FP32 throughput gap is the decisive differentiator. The RTX 4080 Mobile’s 24.72 TFLOPS doubles the Intel part’s 12.29 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA chip also carries 232 tensor cores, enabling AI workloads that the Intel part cannot accelerate through tensor hardware. The shading unit count of 7424 versus 2560 and RT core count of 58 versus 20 confirm NVIDIA’s compute advantage.

For users whose workloads fit within 12 GB of memory, the RTX 4080 Mobile is the superior choice based on measured scores and compute specifications. For users who need more than 12 GB of memory, higher memory bandwidth, or a desktop workstation card with DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides those capabilities, but the database contains no benchmark evidence of its performance.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR6.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile delivers 24.72 TFLOPS, exactly double the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual’s 12.29 TFLOPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 by 0.4 percent and the RTX 5080 Mobile by 0.6 percent, while leading the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4 by 1.3 percent each.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP with a suggested 800 W PSU, while the RTX 4080 Mobile has a 110 W TDP and no PSU suggestion.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has 7424 shading units, compared to 2560 on the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 456.0 GB/s, while the RTX 4080 Mobile provides 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, versus 133.2 GPixel/s for the RTX 4080 Mobile.