Intel Arc Pro B50 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B50 and Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy very different positions in the database. The Intel card is a compact, low-power professional GPU with a full suite of measured benchmarks, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a larger, higher-power part with a more ambitious specification sheet but no recorded benchmark scores. The data shows a clear split in intended use cases based on their physical and architectural profiles.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B50 wins in the specific domain of measured, validated performance. Its benchmark results are recorded across eight tests, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1604, a Passmark G3D score of 12553, and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 6037. These numbers place it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2660. The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645 (0.6% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER at 2690 (1.1% ahead). This indicates the Arc Pro B50 sits in a very tight performance cluster, with all four rivals within a 1.1% range.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw specification headroom. Its shading units count 6144, which is three times the 2048 of the Intel card. Its TMUs are 192 versus 128, and its ROPs are 96 versus 16. The FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, more than double the 10.65 TFLOPS of the Arc Pro B50. The memory subsystem is also substantially larger: 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to 16 GB on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 41.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 332.8 GTexel/s. These figures point to a card designed for workloads that demand massive parallel throughput and high memory capacity.

The use-case split is clear from the form factors. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is 167 mm long, 69 mm high, and 40 mm wide, drawing 70 W from the slot with no power connectors and requiring a 250 W suggested PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide, drawing 225 W through a single 16-pin connector and requiring a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel card is suited for small form factor workstations and low-power deployments. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is built for a full-size chassis with dedicated power delivery.

The Verdict

The data indicates that these two cards serve different buyers entirely. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is a validated, shipping product with a launch MSRP of 349 USD, active production status, and a release date of September 4, 2025. Its benchmark scores are concrete and comparable. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an active production status and a release date of March 16, 2026, but its benchmark array is empty. No average score, no percentile rank beyond the 50th percentile placeholder, and no nearest rivals are recorded.

For a buyer who needs verified performance data, the Intel Arc Pro B50 is the only choice with evidence. Its scores place it in the 17th percentile, which is modest, but the data is real and the performance envelope is well characterized. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, offers specifications that suggest far higher theoretical performance, but the database contains no measurements to confirm it. The 50th percentile rating is not backed by any test results.

For a buyer who needs maximum memory and compute throughput, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has the specification advantage. It offers 24 GB of memory, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. These are the numbers that matter for large datasets and heavy compute loads. The Intel card cannot match any of these figures. The choice comes down to whether the buyer trusts specifications or requires measured results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards. The winsA and winsB counters are both zero. This absence of direct comparison data is itself informative: the two products have not been tested against each other in any shared workload.

The closest comparison available comes from the Intel card's nearest rivals. The Arc Pro B50's average benchmark score of 2660 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662, a 0.1% difference. It is also effectively tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664, a 0.2% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 trails by 0.6%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER leads by 1.1%. These deltas are so small that the Arc Pro B50's performance is statistically indistinguishable from all four rivals.

For the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, no such comparison exists. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. The only performance-related data points are its theoretical specifications. The FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, the pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, and the memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s all indicate a far more capable part than the Intel card, but without test scores, these remain unvalidated claims.

The Intel card's individual benchmark results show a varied profile. The Passmark G3D score of 12553 is strong relative to its average, while the Passmark DX10 score of 58 and DX12 score of 64 are low. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1604 suggests modern DX12 workloads are handled acceptably. The Passmark G2D score of 717 indicates decent 2D performance. These scores, taken together, paint a picture of a card that performs best in specific legacy or compute workloads rather than uniformly across all tests.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 24 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 224.0 GB/s from 16 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B50 draws 70 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO draws 225 W through a single 16-pin connector and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, more than double the 10.65 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc Pro B50.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Pro B50 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 2660 is within 1.1% of all four nearest rivals: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER at 2690, the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645.

Q: Are there any measured benchmark scores for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: No, the database records no benchmark entries for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Its average benchmark score is 0 and its nearest rivals list is empty.

Q: What is the physical size difference between the two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B50 measures 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is substantially larger at 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on completely different architectures from different manufacturers. The Intel Arc Pro B50 uses the BMG-G21 chip with the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are both listed as unknown.

The compute resources differ sharply. The Intel card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 16 dedicated RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but its RT core count is listed as null, meaning no ray tracing hardware is specified. The Lisuan card's FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the Intel card achieves 21.30 TFLOPS FP16, also at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory architecture is a notable divergence. The Intel card uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The Lisuan card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Lisuan card's memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is nearly double the Intel card's 224.0 GB/s.

The interface standards also differ. The Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs are different as well: the Intel card has four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connectors, while the Lisuan card has four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

Specification Differences

The most direct specification differences are in the core config and memory. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The Lisuan card also has no RT cores listed, while the Intel card has 16. The FP32 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS for the Lisuan card versus 10.65 TFLOPS for the Intel card.

Memory capacity and bandwidth are major differentiators. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 at 432.0 GB/s, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 16 GB of GDDR6 at 224.0 GB/s. The memory bus is 192-bit for the Lisuan card and 128-bit for the Intel card. The Lisuan card's memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for the Intel card.

Power and physical dimensions differ significantly. The Intel card has a TDP of 70 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Intel card is 167 mm long, 69 mm high, and 40 mm wide. The Lisuan card is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. Both are dual-slot designs.

The process nodes differ by one step: the Intel card is on 5 nm, the Lisuan card on 6 nm, both at TSMC. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8 for the Intel card and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Lisuan card. The release dates are about six months apart: the Intel card launched September 4, 2025, and the Lisuan card is dated March 16, 2026. The Intel card has a launch MSRP of 349 USD, while the Lisuan card has no recorded launch MSRP.