Intel Arc Pro B390 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc Pro B390

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2500 MHz
TDP 80 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2475 MHz
TDP 220 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
4,627
geekbench_opencl
N/A
172,795
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
205,624
passmark_directx_10
N/A
167
passmark_directx_11
N/A
273
passmark_directx_12
N/A
110
passmark_directx_9
N/A
344
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,184
passmark_g3d
N/A
29,995
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
17,108

Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B390 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast between the Intel Arc Pro B390 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. The RTX 4070 SUPER holds the absolute advantage in every measured metric, as the Intel part has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. The Arc Pro B390’s average benchmark score is 0, while the RTX 4070 SUPER delivers an average score of 43,223. This places the NVIDIA card at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, whereas the Intel integrated part sits at the 50th percentile with no empirical data to support a direct comparison.

Focusing solely on the RTX 4070 SUPER’s benchmark results, the strongest raw performance figure comes from Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 205,624. The OpenCL test follows closely at 172,795, indicating the card’s compute capabilities scale well across different APIs. In the Passmark suite, the G3D score of 29,995 represents the primary gaming-oriented metric, while the GPU compute score of 17,108 shows a substantial gap between rasterization and compute workloads. The DirectX 9 score of 344, DirectX 11 score of 273, and DirectX 12 score of 110 demonstrate that the card’s legacy API performance is strong, but the newer DirectX 12 path yields a lower score in this specific Passmark test, likely reflecting the test’s methodology rather than a weakness in the hardware itself.

The RTX 4070 SUPER’s nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB posts an average score of 43,262, which is a 0.1% delta against the RTX 4070 SUPER, meaning the two are effectively tied. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile also sits at 43,268, again a 0.1% delta. The Quadro M6000 (non-24GB variant) reaches 43,301, a 0.2% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile leads the pack at 43,667, but the RTX 4070 SUPER trails it by only 1%. This clustering shows that the RTX 4070 SUPER performs within a narrow band of high-end mobile and workstation parts, despite being a desktop card.

For the Intel Arc Pro B390, the absence of benchmark data means no wins can be recorded. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins tally is 0 for each side. This is not a case of near parity; it is a complete lack of comparative measurements for the Intel part. The database cannot assign a performance delta because no test results exist for the Arc Pro B390.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 SUPER wins in every category where data exists. Its 7,168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units provide the hardware foundation for its benchmark scores. The card’s FP32 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate that it handles both single-precision and half-precision workloads at the same rate, which is typical for NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture. The pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s further support its dominance in fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The RTX 4070 SUPER’s memory subsystem is another clear win. It uses 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes without bandwidth starvation. The card’s 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores are additional assets that the Intel part cannot match, as the Arc Pro B390 has only 12 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 wins in power efficiency and form factor, though not in raw performance. Its TDP is 80 W compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 220 W. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and a slot width of IGP, meaning it requires no additional power cabling and fits directly on the processor package. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot card requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested 550 W power supply. The Arc Pro B390’s memory is system shared, so it draws from the host system’s RAM rather than dedicated VRAM, which reduces cost and complexity but limits performance.

The Intel part also wins on process node efficiency. It is built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry, whereas the RTX 4070 SUPER uses a 5 nm process at TSMC. The smaller node gives the Arc Pro B390 a potential power and density advantage, but the benchmark data does not exist to translate this into performance.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the only viable choice for any workload that requires measurable graphics performance. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no percentile ranking above the median. Its 50th percentile placement is a placeholder, not a result. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 83rd percentile and 43,223 average score place it firmly in the upper tier of all GPUs.

For users who need a discrete graphics card for gaming, rendering, or compute tasks, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the clear pick. Its nearest rivals, such as the Quadro M6000 24 GB and RTX 4090 Mobile, are within 1% of its average score, which means the RTX 4070 SUPER competes at the high end despite its desktop form factor. The card’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are substantial assets for modern workloads.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is suitable only for systems where integrated graphics are the sole option and where the host processor already includes the GPU. Its 80 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a low-power solution, but the absence of benchmark data means no performance claims can be made. The database shows no reason to select this part for any performance-sensitive application.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 has an average benchmark score of 0, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43,223.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with an average score of 43,262, a 0.1% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268, also a 0.1% delta. The Quadro M6000 scores 43,301, a 0.2% delta, and the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, a 1% delta.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory with a system shared type and bus width, with bandwidth dependent on the system. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has a TDP of 220 W.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7,168 shading units, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 has 1,536 shading units.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry. The RTX 4070 SUPER is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. Its predecessor is HD Graphics-WM. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. No tensor cores are listed. The FP32 throughput is 7.680 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 15.36 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. This indicates that the Intel part uses a packed FP16 path, offering double the half-precision rate relative to FP32.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the GeForce 40-series generation. It has 7,168 shading units, 224 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 56 ray tracing cores, and 224 tensor cores. The FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 35.48 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning the card processes both data types at the same speed. The transistor count is 35,800 million on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The RTX 4070 SUPER supports the same API set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The architectural differences are substantial. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 4.7 times more shading units, 4.7 times more TMUs, 3.3 times more ROPs, and 4.7 times more ray tracing cores than the Arc Pro B390. The tensor core count difference is also stark, with 224 tensor cores on the NVIDIA side versus none on the Intel side. The FP32 throughput difference is roughly 4.6 times in favor of the RTX 4070 SUPER.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The process node differs: Intel uses 3 nm, NVIDIA uses 5 nm. The foundry differs: Intel’s own foundry versus TSMC. The transistor count is unknown for the Intel part, while the RTX 4070 SUPER has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die with a density of 121.8M per mm².

Clock speeds differ significantly. The Arc Pro B390 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The Intel part has a lower base clock but a slightly higher boost clock, though the NVIDIA card’s higher base clock contributes to its sustained performance.

Memory configurations are completely different. The Intel part uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s and a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Power and physical specifications diverge. The Arc Pro B390 has a TDP of 80 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has a slot width of IGP. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a TDP of 220 W, is a dual-slot card, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and requires a suggested 550 W power supply. The bus interface differs: IGP for Intel versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs differ: portable device dependent for Intel versus 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for NVIDIA. Dimensions differ, with the RTX 4070 SUPER measuring 267 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width.

Production status and release dates differ. The Intel part is active and released on 2026-01-26, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is end-of-life and was released on 2024-01-16. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded. The predecessor and successor relationships differ: Intel’s predecessor is HD Graphics-WM with no successor listed, while NVIDIA’s predecessor is GeForce 30 and successor is GeForce 50. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s series is GeForce 40-series, while the Intel part has no series listed.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro B390
RTX 4070 SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,536
7,168 +366.7%
Shaders
1,536
7,168 +366.7%
TMUs
48
224 +366.7%
ROPs
24
80 +233.3%
SM Count
56
Execution Units
12
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
2500 MHz
2475 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
12,288
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
System Shared
192 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
504.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
60.00 GPixel/s
198.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
120.0 GTexel/s
554.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.680 TFLOPS
35.48 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
960.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
554.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
15.36 TFLOPS (2:1)
35.48 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
56 +366.7%
Tensor Cores
224
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
80 W
220 W
TDP (W)
80
220 +175.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Panther Lake
AD104
Generation
Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake)
GeForce 40
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
35,800 million
Die Size
unknown
294 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
121.8M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
599 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
HD Graphics-WM
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
View Arc Pro B390 Details View GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Details