Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro A60 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO are both active 6 nm GPUs built by TSMC, but they enter the database from opposite directions. The A60 carries a full set of measured results, including Geekbench OpenCL score 63485, Geekbench Vulkan score 57166, and an average benchmark score of 60326. The LX PRO has no benchmark entries, an average score of 0, and no nearest rivals. This asymmetry shapes the comparison: the A60 can be analyzed through recorded performance, while the LX PRO can only be analyzed through its listed specifications.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data gives the Arc Pro A60 a clear set of verified wins. It is the only card in this pair with benchmark scores, and its 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it ahead of the LX PRO's 50th percentile, which reflects absent data rather than measured results. The A60 also carries 16 ray tracing cores, supports Vulkan 1.4 against the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3, and provides four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs against the LX PRO's four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Its 130 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU are substantially lower than the LX PRO's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU, and its single-slot cooler occupies less space than the LX PRO's dual-slot design.

The LX PRO wins on raw specification counts. Its 6144 shading units are three times the A60's 2048, its 192 TMUs exceed the A60's 128, and its 96 ROPs exceed the A60's 64. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly three times the A60's 8.397 TFLOPS, and its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is nearly three times the A60's 16.79 TFLOPS. It doubles the memory capacity to 24 GB from 12 GB and raises bandwidth to 432.0 GB/s from 384.0 GB/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s top the A60's 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s. These are specification wins, not benchmark wins, because the database contains no measured scores for the LX PRO.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural families. The A60 uses Intel's Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip and belongs to the Alchemist (Pro Series) generation. The LX PRO uses a TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip and belongs to the 7G100 generation. Both are manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, which is where the manufacturing similarity ends.

The A60 has a documented transistor budget of 11,500 million on a 269 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The LX PRO's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so its density cannot be calculated. The A60's compute layout uses 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, while the LX PRO uses 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The A60 includes 16 RT cores for hardware ray tracing; the LX PRO lists no RT cores.

Clock behavior also differs. The A60 has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clock, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. Both cards use GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, but the LX PRO reaches 432.0 GB/s versus 384.0 GB/s.

On the API side, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The A60 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The A60 outputs four DisplayPort 2.0 connections; the LX PRO outputs four DisplayPort 1.4a connections. The LX PRO is the physically larger card at 248 mm (9.8 inches) long, 118 mm (4.6 inches) tall, and 48 mm (1.9 inches) wide, while the A60's dimensions are not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro A60 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO also specifies a higher memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the LX PRO support hardware ray tracing?

A: The database lists no RT cores for the LX PRO. The Arc Pro A60 lists 16 RT cores. Ray tracing acceleration is therefore a feature of the A60 only.

Q: Which card has a higher measured benchmark score?

A: Only the A60 has measured scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL result is 63485, its Geekbench Vulkan result is 57166, and its average benchmark score is 60326. The LX PRO has no benchmark entries and an average score of 0.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The A60 has a 130 W TDP and a 300 W suggested PSU, and it uses a single-slot design. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested PSU, uses a dual-slot design, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The A60 lists no power connector.

Q: Which card is newer?

A: The LX PRO has a release date of March 16, 2026. The Arc Pro A60 has a release date of June 5, 2023. Both are listed as active production products.

Q: What is the display output difference?

A: Both cards provide four display outputs, but the A60 uses DisplayPort 2.0 while the LX PRO uses DisplayPort 1.4a. The A60 also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Alchemist (Pro Series) | 7G100 |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 269 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor density | 42.8M / mm² | Not listed |

| Base clock | 900 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost clock | 2050 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT cores | 16 | Not listed |

| Pixel rate | 131.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 262.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 8.397 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 130 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connector | Not listed | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release date | June 5, 2023 | March 16, 2026 |

| Percentile | 88 | 50 |

| Average score | 60326 | 0 |

| Benchmarks | Geekbench OpenCL 63485, Geekbench Vulkan 57166 | None |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair. The wins counters are 0 for both cards. The only measured results belong to the Arc Pro A60, so its nearest rivals in the database provide the useful context.

Against those rivals, the A60's average score of 60326 places it level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, which has an average score of 60347 and a percentage difference of 0%. The A60 sits 0.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, whose average score is 60140. It sits 2.5% below the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, whose average score is 61896. It sits 2.8% above the AMD Radeon PRO V710, whose average score is 58657. These percentage gaps come directly from the database's nearest rival data.

Within its own benchmark suite, the A60 scores 63485 in Geekbench OpenCL and 57166 in Geekbench Vulkan, with the OpenCL result higher than the Vulkan result. The LX PRO has no equivalent results, so no cross-card benchmark comparison can be made from measured data.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. The Arc Pro A60 is the only card in this comparison with verified performance. Its average score of 60326, its 88th percentile ranking, its 16 ray tracing cores, its DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, and its lower 130 W TDP make it the choice for users who need confirmed benchmark results, hardware ray tracing, and efficient power delivery in a single-slot form factor.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers a higher specification ceiling on paper. Its 24 GB memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 throughput exceed the A60 across every raw compute and memory metric. However, the database records no benchmark scores for the LX PRO, so those specifications remain unverified in practice. Its 50th percentile and average score of 0 reflect that missing data.

Users who require measured performance should select the A60. Users who need the larger memory capacity and higher compute figures on paper would choose the LX PRO, accepting that its performance is not yet supported by recorded benchmark results.