Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The data here tells a story of two completely different GPU classes. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is a low-power, end-of-life mobile professional part built for portability and basic acceleration, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop behemoth designed for high-end gaming and compute. If you are building a workstation that demands maximum throughput, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only choice. Its OpenCL score is 199,267, which is 84% higher than the Arc Pro A30M’s 31,894. That is not a close race; it is a rout.

However, the Arc Pro A30M is not without purpose. Its 50 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it suitable for compact, low-power systems where physical space and thermal output are paramount. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, in contrast, requires a 285 W TDP, a 600 W suggested PSU, and a triple-slot cooler, meaning it will dominate your chassis. For a builder prioritizing density and efficiency over raw performance, the Arc Pro A30M is the sensible pick. For anyone else, the NVIDIA card is the definitive answer. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also offers 16 GB of VRAM compared to the Arc’s 4 GB, making it viable for large datasets and modern game textures that the Intel card simply cannot hold.

The verdict is straightforward: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins on every performance metric available in this data, while the Arc Pro A30M wins on power draw and physical footprint. Choose based on your workload’s demands, not on marketing hype.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 31,894. The NVIDIA card leads by 84% in that test.

Q: Can the Intel Arc Pro A30M handle modern AAA gaming at high settings?

A: With only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 64-bit bus, the data indicates it would struggle. Its memory bandwidth is 128.0 GB/s, which is far below the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 672.3 GB/s, suggesting severe limitations with high-resolution textures.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between these two cards?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A30M has a 50 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin connector, and NVIDIA suggests a 600 W PSU for the system.

Q: Which card is better for a small form factor build?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A30M is clearly better for compact systems. It has no specified length, height, or width, and its power connectors are listed as "None." The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 310 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 61 mm wide, with a triple-slot design.

Q: Do both cards support the same modern APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has dedicated tensor cores (264) and more RT cores (66 vs 8), which the Arc Pro A30M lacks for tensor operations.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER much faster in compute workloads?

A: Yes. In the only shared benchmark (Geekbench OpenCL), the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 84% faster. Its FP32 throughput is 44.10 TFLOPS versus the Intel card’s 4.096 TFLOPS, a massive gap.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation for Pro-Series Mobile. This is a 6 nm TSMC part with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD103 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process. It packs 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die, giving it a much higher transistor density of 121.1M / mm² versus the Intel’s 45.9M / mm².

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads like DLSS. The Intel Arc Pro A30M has only 8 RT cores and no tensor cores listed, meaning it lacks the dedicated AI acceleration hardware found in the NVIDIA part. The NVIDIA card also supports a 1:1 FP16 ratio (44.10 TFLOPS), while the Intel card’s FP16 is half-rate (8.192 TFLOPS at 2:1). This makes the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER far more capable for mixed-precision compute tasks.

The memory subsystems are also architecturally distinct. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, while the Intel card uses GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus. This 4x difference in bus width directly contributes to the NVIDIA card’s 672.3 GB/s bandwidth versus the Intel’s 128.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card also supports PCIe 4.0 x16, whereas the Intel Arc Pro A30M is limited to PCIe 4.0 x8, halving the available bandwidth for data transfer to the CPU.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet shows a clear divide in nearly every category. The Intel Arc Pro A30M has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. That is over 8x more shading units, 4x more TMUs, and 3x more ROPs on the NVIDIA side.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The Intel card runs at a base of 1500 MHz and boosts to 2000 MHz. The NVIDIA card has a base of 2340 MHz and boosts to 2610 MHz. Even at base clock, the NVIDIA card runs 56% faster than the Intel’s boost clock. Memory clocks also differ: the Intel card’s memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the NVIDIA card’s memory runs at 1313 MHz but with 21 Gbps effective due to the GDDR6X architecture.

The form factor and power delivery are polar opposites. The Intel Arc Pro A30M has a 50 W TDP, no power connectors, and no listed dimensions, indicating a mobile or embedded design. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP, a triple-slot cooler, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and measures 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm. The NVIDIA card also has a suggested PSU of 600 W, while the Intel card has no such requirement.

Display outputs also differ: the NVIDIA card has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Intel card’s outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent." The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched on 2024-01-23 with an MSRP of 799 USD, while the Intel card launched earlier on 2022-08-07 with no MSRP listed. Both are now end-of-life products.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available in the data is the Geekbench OpenCL test. In this test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 199,267, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 31,894. The delta is -84%, meaning the Intel card is 84% slower than the NVIDIA card in this specific workload. This is a massive gap that reflects the fundamental differences in compute resources: the NVIDIA card has 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus the Intel’s 4.096 TFLOPS.

Looking at the broader benchmark suite for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, it also has a Passmark G3D score of 31,811 and a GPU compute score of 18,372, along with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,569. It also shows strong Vulkan performance with a Geekbench score of 53,683. The Intel Arc Pro A30M has no other benchmark scores in the pack besides its OpenCL result, so its performance profile beyond that single test is not documented here.

The nearest rival data reinforces the NVIDIA card’s position. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average benchmark score is 31,087, which places it 0.4% below the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31,206) and 1.9% below the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31,676). The Intel Arc Pro A30M’s average score is 31,894, which is 0.7% above the TITAN RTX and 1.1% above the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (31,532). While the Intel card’s single OpenCL score is competitive with its nearest rivals, it is far below the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s raw OpenCL number. The percentile ranking for both cards is identical at 76, but that seems to be a quirk of the dataset given the 6x difference in raw OpenCL performance.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every benchmark where data exists. Its 84% lead in OpenCL is the headline, but its other scores—such as the 31811 Passmark G3D and 18372 compute scores—show a GPU that is built for heavy lifting. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth makes it suitable for large-scale data processing, high-resolution rendering, and modern gaming with ray tracing enabled. The 264 tensor cores and 66 RT cores give it a decisive edge in AI-accelerated workloads and ray-traced scenes, which the Intel card cannot match due to its lack of tensor cores and only 8 RT cores.

The Intel Arc Pro A30M wins in the categories of power efficiency and physical size. Its 50 W TDP is a fraction of the NVIDIA’s 285 W, and it requires no power connectors or suggested PSU. This makes it ideal for ultra-portable workstations, embedded systems, or fanless builds where the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER would be impossible to accommodate. The Intel card’s 4 GB of memory and 64-bit bus are sufficient for basic 2D acceleration, light video decode, or as a display output for professional mobile workstations. Its lack of tensor cores means it is not suited for AI inference, but its low power draw allows it to run in systems where the NVIDIA card would need a larger chassis and more robust cooling.

In summary, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the performance champion for any compute-intensive or gaming task. The Arc Pro A30M is the efficiency champion for constrained, low-power environments. The data does not support any other conclusion.