Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile and Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum. The Intel part is an integrated graphics engine built for low-power mobile systems, while the LX PRO is a large, discrete add-in card with dedicated memory and a high power ceiling. The recorded data shows two designs with no shared specifications beyond API support and production status. This analysis compares their architecture, benchmark implications, and suitability strictly from the database entries.

FAQ

Q: What are the process nodes used by each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process fabricated by Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process fabricated by TSMC.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Intel part has system shared memory, meaning its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. The LX PRO has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel part delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS, which equals 1.28 TFLOPS. The LX PRO is approximately 19 times higher in FP32 throughput.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part lists Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO lists Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical form factors?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and a portable device dependent display output. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with one 16-pin power connector and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Architecture Differences

The architecture gap between these two GPUs is substantial. Intel uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on the Wildcat Lake chip, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. Lisuan Tech uses the TrueGPU architecture on the 7G105 chip, part of the 7G100 generation. The Intel design is built on a 3 nm node at Intel fabs, while the LX PRO uses a 6 nm node at TSMC. Process node choice directly affects transistor density and power efficiency, though the database lists transistor counts as unknown for both.

Compute resources differ by a wide margin. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. These counts indicate the LX PRO has 24 times the shading units, 12 times the TMUs, and 12 times the ROPs of the Intel part. The Intel GPU includes 2 RT cores, while the LX PRO lists no RT cores in the database. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.

Clock behavior also differs. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel GPU uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s. The memory subsystem alone separates these designs into different performance classes.

The Intel GPU is an integrated part with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface. The LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, one 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The LX PRO also has defined physical dimensions: 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The Intel part has no dimensions listed because it is integrated into a mobile platform.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Intel GPU's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile integration.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP makes it suitable for thin, portable devices with no additional power connectors. The system shared memory approach means it can use whatever memory the host provides, and its IGP bus interface requires no separate slot. The 3 nm process node, smaller than the LX PRO's 6 nm node, suggests a more modern fabrication approach, though the database does not include direct efficiency measurements.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw compute and memory capacity. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance dwarfs the Intel part's 1,280.0 GFLOPS. The 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a dedicated, high-speed memory pool that the Intel part cannot match with system shared memory. The LX PRO also has higher pixel and texture rates: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 20.00 GPixel/s, and 384.0 GTexel/s versus 40.00 GTexel/s. The LX PRO has 96 ROPs versus 8 ROPs, indicating much higher fill rate potential for resolutions and heavy fragment work.

The LX PRO wins in memory bandwidth by a decisive margin. The Intel part's bandwidth is system dependent, but the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s is a fixed specification. The LX PRO also supports PCIe 4.0 x16, a full-bandwidth interface for discrete cards, while the Intel part uses IGP. The LX PRO's four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs allow multi-monitor setups, whereas the Intel part's display outputs depend on the portable device.

The Intel part wins in form factor flexibility. It has no slot width, no power connectors, and no dimensions, making it invisible to the user in a mobile device. The LX PRO is a large dual-slot card with specific dimensions and a 16-pin power connector, requiring a desktop chassis with adequate space and power delivery.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification. The Intel part uses a 3 nm process at Intel; the LX PRO uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel architecture is Xe3-LPG on the Wildcat Lake chip; the LX PRO architecture is TrueGPU on the 7G105 chip. The Intel generation is Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake); the LX PRO generation is 7G100.

Clock speeds: the Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost of 2500 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed, but its memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. Memory: the Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth; the LX PRO has 24 GB GDDR6, 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: the Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 2 RT cores. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no RT cores listed. Rates: the Intel part has a pixel rate of 20.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 40.00 GTexel/s. The LX PRO has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 1,280.0 GFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 2.560 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical: the Intel part has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, dual-slot width, one 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The LX PRO has dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width; the Intel part has no dimensions. Display outputs: portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

APIs: both have DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Vulkan differs: 1.4 on Intel, 1.3 on LX PRO. Release dates: the Intel part is dated 2026-04-15, the LX PRO is dated 2026-03-16. The Intel part has a predecessor listed as HD Graphics-M; the LX PRO has no predecessor. Both are listed as Active production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no direct head-to-head benchmark entries, no wins for either GPU, and no nearest rivals. However, the specification data provides clear comparative measurements. The LX PRO's FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 19.2 times higher than the Intel part's 1,280.0 GFLOPS. In FP16, the LX PRO's 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) is 19.2 times higher than the Intel part's 2.560 TFLOPS (2:1). These ratios confirm the LX PRO holds a massive compute advantage.

Pixel rate favors the LX PRO at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 20.00 GPixel/s, a 9.6 times difference. Texture rate favors the LX PRO at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 40.00 GTexel/s, also a 9.6 times difference. The LX PRO's 96 ROPs versus 8 ROPs indicates a 12 times difference in raster operations capability. Its 192 TMUs versus 16 TMUs is a 12 times difference in texture units.

Memory bandwidth is a key separator. The LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s of dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth. The Intel part's bandwidth is system dependent, so no fixed number exists, but system shared memory on a mobile IGP cannot approach the dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth of a discrete card. The LX PRO's 24 GB memory capacity is a fixed value, while the Intel part's capacity is system shared and variable.

Power consumption shows an inverse relationship. The LX PRO consumes 225 W, nine times the Intel part's 25 W. This power difference explains the performance gap: the LX PRO uses substantially more energy to deliver its higher throughput. The Intel part's 25 W TDP makes it suitable for battery-powered devices, while the LX PRO's 225 W TDP requires a desktop power supply rated at 550 W.

The Intel part has a boost clock of 2500 MHz, a high frequency for an integrated GPU, but its 256 shading units limit total throughput. The LX PRO has no clock listed, but its 6,144 shading units deliver the bulk of its compute advantage. The Intel part includes 2 RT cores, a feature absent from the LX PRO's specifications, which could benefit ray-traced workloads if the software stack supports them.

Vulkan support differs: the Intel part lists 1.4, the LX PRO lists 1.3. This means the Intel part supports a newer Vulkan version, potentially enabling newer rendering features. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so modern DirectX features are available on both.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs for entirely different purposes. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is a 25 W integrated GPU with 256 shading units, system shared memory, and a 3 nm process at Intel. It is designed for portable devices where power draw and physical footprint are critical. Its 2 RT cores provide ray tracing capability that the LX PRO lacks, and its Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX PRO's 1.3. For light graphics workloads, media playback, and basic 3D acceleration in a mobile form factor, the Intel part is the only choice between these two, as the LX PRO cannot be installed in such a system.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a 225 W dual-slot discrete card with 6,144 shading units, 24 GB GDDR6, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. It delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 192.0 GPixel/s, and 384.0 GTexel/s, all far above the Intel part. Its 24 GB memory capacity and 192-bit bus make it suited for large datasets and high-resolution rendering. The LX PRO requires a 550 W suggested PSU, one 16-pin power connector, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. Its four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor configurations. For compute-heavy tasks, large memory footprints, or high-resolution workloads, the LX PRO is the clear choice.

The Intel part wins on power, integration, and ray tracing support. The LX PRO wins on compute, memory, fill rates, and display outputs. Neither GPU has benchmark scores or nearest rivals in the database, so the verdict rests entirely on specification analysis. The 19.2 times FP32 advantage of the LX PRO is the single largest measured difference, followed by the 12 times differences in TMUs and ROPs. The 9 times power difference (225 W versus 25 W) explains the performance gap. Users with a desktop platform and adequate power delivery should select the LX PRO for maximum throughput. Users needing a low-power integrated solution for a portable device should select the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. The database shows no overlap in their intended use cases.