Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data provides no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile and the Intel Arc Pro A60. The database shows only standalone scores for the Arc Pro A60, which limits direct numerical comparison. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, meaning its raw performance cannot be quantified against the Arc Pro A60 with recorded numbers.

What can be analyzed is the positioning of each product based on their available data. The Arc Pro A60 delivers an average benchmark score of 60,326 across two tests: Geekbench OpenCL at 63,485 and Geekbench Vulkan at 57,166. This places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile sits at the 50th percentile, although this value is not derived from any recorded benchmark scores.

The Arc Pro A60's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its scoring tier. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 scores 60,347, essentially identical with a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140, trailing by 0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M leads by 2.5% at 61,896, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 trails by 2.8% at 58,657. These results place the Arc Pro A60 in a competitive band where small percentage differences separate adjacent products.

The absence of any recorded benchmark for the Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile means its actual performance remains unmeasured in this database. The 50th percentile ranking is a positional indicator, but without concrete scores, any performance inference is speculative. The Arc Pro A60, by contrast, has a clear performance footprint that firmly establishes it in the upper half of the database distribution.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip built on the Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. The Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count for the Wildcat Lake chip is listed as unknown, while the DG2-256 chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter.

The processing resources differ substantially. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 render output units. The Arc Pro A60 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The ray tracing hardware follows the same pattern: 2 RT cores for the mobile part versus 16 for the Pro A60. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.

Clock behavior also diverges. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2,500 MHz. The Arc Pro A60 has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2,050 MHz. The mobile part relies on a higher boost ceiling but starts from a much lower base, while the desktop Pro part maintains a higher baseline frequency.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all marked as system dependent. The Arc Pro A60 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock for the Arc Pro A60 is 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The power and interface profiles reflect their intended deployment. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP bus interface. The Arc Pro A60 is a single-slot discrete card with a 130 W TDP, a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and a suggested power supply of 300 W. Display outputs for the mobile part are listed as portable device dependent, while the Arc Pro A60 offers 4x DisplayPort 2.0.

Both GPUs support identical API feature sets: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status for both is active, and neither has a successor listed.

FAQ

Q: What is the release date for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile was released on April 15, 2026. The Intel Arc Pro A60 was released on June 5, 2023.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 delivers 131.2 GPixel/s, which is substantially higher than the 20.00 GPixel/s of the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile.

Q: How do the FP32 performance figures compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 provides 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile provides 1,280.0 GFLOPS. The Pro A60 is roughly 6.5 times higher in raw FP32 throughput.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system. The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the Arc Pro A60 compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090?

A: The Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60,326, while the RTX 4090 scores 60,347, a delta of 0%. The two are statistically indistinguishable in the database.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process at Intel. The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile | Intel Arc Pro A60 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Chip | Wildcat Lake | DG2-256 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Xe-HPG |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) | Alchemist (Pro Series) |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 11,500 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 269 mm² |

| Transistor Density | null | 42.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz | 2050 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 384.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 256 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 16 | 128 |

| ROPs | 8 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 2 | 16 |

| Pixel Rate | 20.00 GPixel/s | 131.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 40.00 GTexel/s | 262.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 1,280.0 GFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 2.560 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 130 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | null |

| Suggested PSU | null | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 |

| Release Date | 2026-04-15 | 2023-06-05 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-M | null |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 88 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 0 | 60326 |

The Verdict

The data shows two GPUs designed for different roles with correspondingly different capabilities. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the clear performance leader based on recorded measurements. Its average benchmark score of 60,326 places it at the 88th percentile, and its nearest rivals in the database are flagship-class parts like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, where the delta is 0%. The Arc Pro A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and 131.2 GPixel/s of pixel throughput. These are concrete, recorded figures.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its 50th percentile ranking is not supported by any measured performance data. The specifications show a 25 W integrated processor with 256 shading units and system shared memory. The architecture is newer, built on a 3 nm process, and it carries a higher boost clock at 2,500 MHz. These are meaningful design differences, but they do not translate into recorded performance numbers.

For workloads that require sustained compute throughput, the Arc Pro A60 is the only option with measured evidence. Its 2048 shading units, 16 RT cores, and dedicated 12 GB GDDR6 pool provide a clear hardware foundation for the benchmark scores it achieves. The Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile, with its 25 W power envelope and integrated nature, targets portable devices where system shared memory and low power draw are priorities. The 2.560 TFLOPS FP16 figure and 1,280.0 GFLOPS FP32 output are modest in absolute terms but consistent with an integrated part.

The release timeline also separates these products. The Arc Pro A60 launched in June 2023, while the Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile arrived in April 2026. The newer part uses the Xe3-LPG architecture and a 3 nm node, while the older part uses Xe-HPG on 6 nm. The transistor density of the DG2-256 chip is recorded at 42.8M per mm², but the Wildcat Lake chip's density is not listed.

Users seeking a discrete GPU with measured performance should consider the Arc Pro A60 based on its benchmark record and 88th percentile standing. Users evaluating the Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile must rely on its specification sheet, as the database contains no performance measurements for it. The 50th percentile positioning suggests mid-tier placement, but without scores, that ranking carries no empirical weight. The choice depends on whether the user prioritizes verified performance or the characteristics of a modern integrated part.