Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the two GPUs compared in this database entry?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, based on the Wildcat Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, based on the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture.

Q: Which GPU has a larger memory capacity?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses System Shared memory with bandwidth that is System Dependent.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption between the two?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W. The LX PRO also requires a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a boost clock of 2300 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no listed base or boost clock in the database. The LX PRO memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the form factor differences?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an IGP with no slot width, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a Dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Q: Which GPU supports more display outputs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has Portable Device Dependent outputs, meaning it relies on the host device's display connections.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It is built on the Wildcat Lake chip and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. This is an integrated graphics processor with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. The architecture includes 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, 4 ROPs, and 1 ray tracing core. The FP32 compute is rated at 588.8 GFLOPS, with FP16 at 1,177.6 GFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. It uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, and its memory bandwidth is entirely dependent on the host system.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. It is based on the 7G105 chip and belongs to the 7G100 generation. This is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card with 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The FP32 compute reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. It has dedicated 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO uses a single 16-pin power connector and requires a 550 W power supply.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech part supports Vulkan 1.3. The Intel GPU is an IGP with no power connectors, while the Lisuan Tech card is a dual-slot PCIe 4.0 x16 card. The process node difference is significant: 3 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for Lisuan Tech. The Intel GPU has a predecessor, HD Graphics-M, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no predecessor listed. Both are currently in Active production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is designed for integrated scenarios where space, power, and thermal constraints dominate. Its 25 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for portable devices. The boost clock of 2300 MHz is high for an integrated part, and the Xe3-LPG architecture includes dedicated ray tracing support. The system shared memory approach means it can adapt to whatever memory the host device provides, making it flexible for thin-and-light systems. The 3 nm process node contributes to efficiency. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3, which may matter for compatibility with the latest Vulkan applications.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is built for raw throughput and dedicated graphics workloads. The 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute is a massive step up from the Intel part, and the 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides substantial headroom for large datasets and high-resolution textures. The 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs deliver texture and pixel throughput that integrated graphics cannot approach. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor configurations. The 225 W TDP indicates a high-performance segment where power is not the primary constraint. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a dedicated, high-bandwidth connection to the host system.

The Intel part wins in scenarios where the system must be compact and power-efficient. The Lisuan Tech part wins in scenarios where compute performance and memory bandwidth are the priority. There is no overlap in their intended use cases, as the Intel GPU is for embedded or mobile integrated graphics, while the Lisuan Tech GPU is for a discrete, high-power expansion card.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. The process node is 3 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for Lisuan Tech. The foundry is Intel for the former and TSMC for the latter. The Intel chip is Wildcat Lake, while the Lisuan Tech chip is 7G105. The architecture is Xe3-LPG versus TrueGPU. The Intel generation is Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake), while the Lisuan Tech generation is 7G100.

The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. The Lisuan Tech GPU has no base or boost clock listed. Memory configuration differs completely: the Intel GPU uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth, while the Lisuan Tech GPU uses 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Compute resources differ substantially: the Intel GPU has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, while the Lisuan Tech GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel GPU has 1 ray tracing core, while the Lisuan Tech GPU has no RT cores listed. Pixel rate is 9.200 GPixel/s for Intel versus 192.0 GPixel/s for Lisuan Tech. Texture rate is 18.40 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 588.8 GFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 1,177.6 GFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both using a 2:1 ratio.

The TDP is 25 W for Intel versus 225 W for Lisuan Tech. The Intel GPU is an IGP with no power connectors, while the Lisuan Tech GPU is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The bus interface is IGP for Intel versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for Lisuan Tech. Display outputs are Portable Device Dependent for Intel versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan Tech. The Lisuan Tech card has physical dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The Intel GPU has no dimensions listed. The Intel GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech GPU supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel GPU has a predecessor, HD Graphics-M, while the Lisuan Tech GPU has none.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. The winsA and winsB values are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. The avgBenchmarkScore for both is zero, and the percentileVsAllGpus is 50 for both. Without recorded measurements, direct performance comparison relies on the specification data.

The FP32 compute difference is the most striking: the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is roughly 41.7 times the 588.8 GFLOPS of the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. In FP16, the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS versus 1,177.6 GFLOPS for the Intel part, a ratio of approximately 41.7 to 1. The pixel rate of the LX PRO is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 9.200 GPixel/s for the Intel GPU, about 20.9 times higher. The texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s, about 20.9 times higher. The memory bandwidth of the LX PRO is 432.0 GB/s, while the Intel GPU's bandwidth is System Dependent, so no direct figure can be compared.

The shading units differ by a factor of 48: 6144 versus 128. The TMUs differ by a factor of 24: 192 versus 8. The ROPs differ by a factor of 24: 96 versus 4. The Intel GPU has 1 RT core, while the LX PRO has none listed. The boost clock of the Intel GPU is 2300 MHz, while the LX PRO has no boost clock recorded. The memory size difference is 24 GB dedicated versus system shared.

The TDP difference is 225 W versus 25 W, a 9 to 1 ratio. The power connector requirement is a 16-pin connector for the LX PRO versus none for the Intel IGP. The suggested PSU for the LX PRO is 550 W, while the Intel part has no suggested PSU listed. The form factor is dual-slot versus IGP. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 versus IGP.

The release dates are close: the Intel part is dated 2026-04-15, and the Lisuan Tech part is dated 2026-03-16. The Intel part was released one month later. Both are in Active production status. The Intel part has a predecessor, HD Graphics-M, while the Lisuan Tech part has none.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs with no performance overlap. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated processor with a 25 W TDP, 128 shading units, and system shared memory. It is built for portable devices where power draw and physical space are limited. Its 2300 MHz boost clock and 1 RT core provide modest graphics capability within an IGP envelope. The 3 nm process node and Xe3-LPG architecture represent a modern, efficient design. The Vulkan 1.4 support is ahead of the Lisuan Tech part.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, 6144 shading units, and 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. The FP32 compute of 24.58 TFLOPS places it in a completely different performance class. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 192 TMUs support high-resolution rendering and large texture workloads. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs enable multi-display setups. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides full bandwidth to the host.

The choice between the two is determined by the host platform. A portable device with an integrated chip requires the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile. A desktop system with a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and a 550 W power supply can accommodate the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The Intel part cannot be installed in a desktop expansion slot, and the Lisuan Tech part cannot be used in a device without a PCIe slot and sufficient power delivery. The power envelope alone separates them: 25 W versus 225 W. The memory architecture separates them further: system shared versus 24 GB GDDR6. The compute resources separate them by orders of magnitude. Users who need integrated graphics in a portable device should use the Intel part. Users who need dedicated graphics performance in a desktop should use the Lisuan Tech part. The benchmark database shows no direct comparison results, so the specification differences stand as the primary decision factors.