Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile and the Intel Arc Pro A60 serve entirely different segments of the GPU market. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, with the Arc Pro A60 holding an 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile sits at the 50th percentile. The Arc Pro A60 is the only option for compute-heavy workloads, professional rendering, or any task requiring dedicated video memory. Its 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are in a different category from the system-shared memory of the mobile chip. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, with its 25 W TDP and integrated design, is suited for basic graphics acceleration and power-constrained portable systems. The Arc Pro A60 is the choice for anyone needing sustained performance, while the mobile part is for basic functionality in a thin and light chassis.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60,326, based on Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ?

A: The Arc Pro A60 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses system-shared memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent.

Q: Are these GPUs on the same manufacturing process?

A: No. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process at Intel, while the Arc Pro A60 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What is the power requirement for each card?

A: The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a 25 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP). The Arc Pro A60 has a 130 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: Do both support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the difference in shading units?

A: The Arc Pro A60 has 2048 shading units, while the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 128.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different Intel architectures. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on the Wildcat Lake chip, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. This is a power-efficient design intended for integration into processors. The Arc Pro A60 uses the Xe-HPG architecture on the DG2-256 chip, part of the Alchemist Pro Series, which is designed for discrete workstation graphics.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The mobile chip is built on a 3 nm process at Intel, while the Arc Pro A60 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Arc Pro A60 has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The mobile chip does not have published transistor or die size data.

Ray tracing capabilities are present in both, but with different implementations. The Arc Pro A60 has 16 ray tracing cores, while the mobile part has just one. This indicates a substantial difference in ray tracing throughput, though no specific benchmark data for this workload is available. The Arc Pro A60 also has a different memory architecture, using dedicated GDDR6, whereas the mobile part shares system memory.

Specification Differences

The specification tables show a wide gap in almost every measurable category. The Arc Pro A60 has 2048 shading units compared to 128 on the mobile chip. Texture mapping units number 128 versus 8, and render output units are 64 versus 4. These differences directly impact fill rates: the Arc Pro A60 achieves 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s, while the mobile part reaches 9.200 GPixel/s and 18.40 GTexel/s.

Compute performance follows the same pattern. The Arc Pro A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16, while the mobile chip provides 588.8 GFLOPS FP32 and 1,177.6 GFLOPS FP16. Clock speeds also differ: the Arc Pro A60 has a 900 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, while the mobile part has a 300 MHz base and 2300 MHz boost. The higher boost clock on the mobile chip does not compensate for its much smaller core configuration.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The Arc Pro A60 is a single-slot card with a 130 W TDP and a 300 W suggested PSU, using a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is an integrated processor with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and no separate bus interface. The Arc Pro A60 has four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, while the mobile part's display outputs are portable device dependent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark results are not available in the database, but the recorded performance data for the Arc Pro A60 provides a clear picture. Its average benchmark score of 60,326 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. In comparison, the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmarks and sits at the 50th percentile, indicating a median position with zero performance data.

The Arc Pro A60's nearest rivals in the database are high-end discrete GPUs. It scores within 0% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, which averages 60,347. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60,140) and 2.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657). The only rival ahead of it is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which leads by 2.5% with a score of 61,896. This positions the Arc Pro A60 as a competitive workstation part, despite having no direct comparison data against the mobile chip.

The Geekbench results for the Arc Pro A60 show 63,485 in OpenCL and 57,166 in Vulkan. These scores are consistent with its 2048 shading units and dedicated memory. The mobile part's theoretical FP32 throughput of 588.8 GFLOPS is roughly 7% of the Arc Pro A60's 8.397 TFLOPS, indicating that any compute workload would favor the discrete card by an order of magnitude.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc Pro A60 dominates in every recorded performance category. Its 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth makes it suitable for large datasets, multi-layered textures, and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads, a feature that the single RT core on the mobile chip cannot match in scale. The 131.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 262.4 GTexel/s texture rate are essential for high-resolution displays and complex scenes. Its 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor professional setups.

The Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile wins in power efficiency and system integration. With a 25 W TDP, it consumes roughly one-fifth the power of the Arc Pro A60. Its 3 nm process at Intel represents a newer manufacturing node, which contributes to this efficiency. The integrated design requires no power connectors, no separate slot, and no dedicated cooling solution beyond what the host system provides. It is the logical choice for compact laptops or low-power desktops where basic graphics acceleration is needed and discrete GPU installation is impossible.

The database shows no benchmark wins for the mobile chip, but its architecture supports modern APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, matching the feature set of the Arc Pro A60. The mobile part also has a higher boost clock at 2300 MHz versus 2050 MHz, though this does not translate into higher overall performance given the massive core count difference. For users who need a GPU for everyday tasks, video playback, and light productivity, the integrated mobile chip provides adequate capability without the power and space requirements of a discrete card. For anyone running professional applications, the Arc Pro A60 is the only viable choice based on the recorded data.