Intel Arc G3 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the Intel Arc G3 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO shows two fundamentally different products with almost no overlap in target use. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the clear performance leader across every measurable compute and rendering metric, delivering 4x the pixel throughput, 4x the texture rate, and 4x the FP32 compute of the Intel Arc G3. The Intel Arc G3 counters with dramatically lower power consumption, a 25 W TDP versus 225 W, and an integrated form factor that requires no power connectors and no expansion slot.

For users who need maximum rendering capability, dedicated memory, and high-bandwidth VRAM, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the only choice from this data. For systems where power efficiency, compact integration, and minimal thermal footprint are the priority, the Intel Arc G3 provides a viable integrated graphics solution. The two products do not compete for the same socket, the same chassis, or the same workload profile.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation, and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC.

The Intel Arc G3 integrates 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster operations units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations units, but the database records no ray tracing core count for it. This means the Intel Arc G3 includes dedicated ray tracing hardware while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's ray tracing capability is not documented in the available data.

Memory architecture differs completely. The Intel Arc G3 uses system shared memory, with the bus width, memory type, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocks at 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective.

API support shows partial overlap. Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc G3 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

The Intel Arc G3 is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP bus interface, a slot width of IGP, and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, one 16-pin power connector, and a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark runs for these two products, so all comparisons come from the specification-derived performance metrics.

Pixel rate is the clearest separator. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 192.0 GPixel/s against the Intel Arc G3's 48.00 GPixel/s, a 4x advantage. This directly impacts fill-rate-bound workloads such as high-resolution rasterization and multi-sample anti-aliasing.

Texture rate shows the same ratio. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO achieves 384.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s for the Intel Arc G3, again a 4x margin. Texture-heavy scenes, especially those using detailed material maps, will scale substantially in favor of the Lisuan Tech LX PRO.

FP32 compute follows the identical pattern. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO produces 24.58 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc G3, a 4x difference. FP16 performance doubles both figures, with the Lisuan Tech LX PRO at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) and the Intel Arc G3 at 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1).

The Intel Arc G3's clock behavior is fully documented: a 300 MHz base clock and a 2400 MHz boost clock. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no base or boost clock recorded in the database, so its performance comes entirely from its higher resource counts and memory subsystem.

Memory bandwidth is a decisive factor for modern workloads. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth is independent of system conditions, while the Intel Arc G3's bandwidth is listed as system dependent, meaning it shares the system memory bus and its effective throughput varies with the host platform.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc G3 | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Panther Lake | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) | 7G100 |

| Process node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Shading units | 1280 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 40 | 192 |

| ROPs | 20 | 96 |

| RT cores | 10 | Not recorded |

| Pixel rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 550 W |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Memory size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release date | 2026-05-31 | 2026-03-16 |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, which is 4x the Intel Arc G3's 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc G3 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which product supports ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 10 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no ray tracing core count recorded in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has a 25 W TDP, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot design, one 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Which API versions are supported?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc G3 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical differences?

A: The Intel Arc G3 is an integrated processor with no slot width and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in every raw performance category recorded. Its 4x advantage in pixel rate, texture rate, and FP32/FP16 compute makes it the stronger choice for high-resolution rendering, heavy texture work, and compute-intensive tasks. The 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides dedicated storage for large datasets, and the 192 bit bus ensures consistent throughput without competing with the host system for memory access. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface gives it a direct, high-bandwidth path to the processor, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-display configurations. Its earlier release date of 2026-03-16 also means it has been available longer in the market.

The Intel Arc G3 wins in efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is one-ninth the power envelope of the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 225 W TDP. It requires no power connectors, no expansion slot, and no dedicated power supply recommendation. The 3 nm process node from Intel's own foundry indicates a more advanced manufacturing process than the 6 nm TSMC node used by the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The Intel Arc G3 also supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer version than the Lisuan Tech LX PRO's 1.3, and includes 10 ray tracing cores that the Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not document. Its portable-device-dependent display outputs and IGP form factor suit mobile or compact systems where a dual-slot, 248 mm long card cannot fit.

The data shows no overlap in use cases. Systems needing a discrete, high-throughput GPU with dedicated memory should select the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Systems needing an integrated graphics solution with minimal power draw and no physical installation requirements should select the Intel Arc G3. The 4x performance gap across all compute metrics, combined with the 9x TDP gap, means the choice is not a trade-off but a determination of which constraint matters more: performance or power.