Intel Arc G3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc G3

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2512 MHz
TDP 250 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
5,077
geekbench_opencl
N/A
172,660
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
178,923
passmark_directx_10
N/A
180
passmark_directx_11
N/A
277
passmark_directx_12
N/A
108
passmark_directx_9
N/A
320
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,305
passmark_g3d
N/A
29,137
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
15,787

Analysis: Intel Arc G3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Arc G3 contains no benchmark scores, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has a full suite of measurements. This makes direct comparisons one-sided, but the available numbers still clarify the performance gap. The RTX 5070 posts a Passmark G3D score of 29,137, a Passmark GPU Compute score of 15,787, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 172,660, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 178,923. The Arc G3, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of zero and no individual test entries, meaning the database contains no measured performance data for it.

The RTX 5070's average benchmark score of 40,377 places it at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with an average score of 40,318, which is 0.1% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40,063, which trails by 0.8%. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40,870, putting it 1.2% ahead of the RTX 5070, while the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39,568, a 2% deficit. These narrow deltas indicate the RTX 5070 sits in a tightly contested cluster, though its percentile rank shows it outperforms the vast majority of recorded GPUs.

Because the Arc G3 has no benchmark entries, there are no head-to-head wins for either product in the database. The wins counter shows zero for both sides. The practical interpretation is that the RTX 5070 is the only one of the two with verifiable performance data, and its scores establish a baseline for what the Arc G3 would need to match or exceed, but no such comparison can be drawn from current measurements.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Arc G3 lists an average benchmark score of 0 and has an empty benchmarks array. No individual test results are recorded for it.

Q: What is the RTX 5070's strongest recorded benchmark result?

A: The highest raw score is the Geekbench Vulkan result at 178,923, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 172,660. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 is the lowest of its major tests but still represents a full DX12 workload.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The RTX 5070 averages 40,377. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 is 0.1% behind at 40,318, the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 0.8% behind at 40,063, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% behind at 39,568. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 is 1.2% ahead at 40,870.

Q: What percentile does the RTX 5070 hold among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 sits at the 82nd percentile, meaning it ranks above roughly four out of five recorded GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Arc G3 have any ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, it lists 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 has 48 ray tracing cores, but no ray tracing benchmark scores are available for either product.

Q: What is the power requirement difference between the two?

A: The Arc G3 has a 25 W TDP and uses no power connectors, while the RTX 5070 has a 250 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin connector, and carries a suggested PSU rating of 600 W.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the measured performer, while the Intel Arc G3 is an unverified entry. The RTX 5070 delivers substantial scores across DX12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and Passmark workloads, with an average benchmark score of 40,377 and an 82nd percentile ranking. The Arc G3 has no recorded scores, no average, and no percentile beyond a default 50th-place listing that reflects no actual measurements.

For any workload requiring known performance, the RTX 5070 is the only choice supported by evidence. The Arc G3's specifications suggest it targets integrated graphics territory, with a 25 W TDP and system-shared memory, but without benchmark data, its real-world capability remains undefined. The RTX 5070's nearest rivals show it competes within a tight band, slightly behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580, but those deltas are under 2% and do not change its standing as the benchmarked winner here.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every specification field. The Arc G3 uses an Intel Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The RTX 5070 uses NVIDIA's GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RTX 5070 has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die with a density of 118.3M per mm²; the Arc G3's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

Clock speeds diverge sharply. The Arc G3 runs at a 300 MHz base and 2,400 MHz boost. The RTX 5070 runs at 2,325 MHz base and 2,512 MHz boost. Memory setups are fundamentally different: the Arc G3 uses system-shared memory with a system-shared bus width and system-dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1,750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Compute resources favor the RTX 5070 heavily. The Arc G3 has 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 48 ray tracing cores, and 192 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 also carries a higher pixel rate at 201.0 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, a higher texture rate at 482.3 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s, and higher FP32 throughput at 30.87 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS. FP16 performance favors the RTX 5070 at 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1) versus the Arc G3's 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1).

Board design differs completely. The Arc G3 is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RTX 5070 is a dual-slot card measuring 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm, using a single 16-pin connector and a 600 W suggested PSU. The bus interface is IGP for the Arc G3 and PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070. Display outputs on the Arc G3 are portable-device dependent; the RTX 5070 offers one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. API support is identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release timing also differs. The RTX 5070 launched with a 549 USD MSRP and has a predecessor (GeForce 40) and successor (GeForce 60) listed. The Arc G3 lists no MSRP, no predecessor, and no successor. The RTX 5070's production status is active, as is the Arc G3's.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is stark. Intel's Arc G3 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm node, representing the third generation of Intel's Xe graphics design. It is part of the Arc Graphics-M generation for Panther Lake, which indicates a mobile-oriented, integrated approach. The RTX 5070 uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm node, a discrete desktop design from the GeForce 50 series.

The core layout reveals different design philosophies. The Arc G3 allocates 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, with 10 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The RTX 5070 allocates 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 48 ray tracing cores, and 192 tensor cores. The tensor core count on the RTX 5070 is a major differentiator, as the Arc G3 has no tensor core field populated, suggesting no dedicated AI acceleration hardware in the recorded data.

Memory architecture reflects the product classes. The Arc G3 relies on system-shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and instead uses the host system's memory pool. The RTX 5070 has a dedicated 12 GB GDDR7 frame buffer with a 192-bit interface and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. This gives the RTX 5070 predictable memory performance, while the Arc G3's bandwidth is marked as system dependent.

The transistor and die data reinforce the gap. The RTX 5070 packs 31,100 million transistors into 263 mm², yielding a density of 118.3M per mm². The Arc G3's transistor count and die size are unknown, so no density comparison is possible. The process node difference, 3 nm for Intel versus 5 nm for TSMC, suggests the Arc G3 uses a more advanced lithography, but the RTX 5070 compensates with far larger silicon and a dedicated memory subsystem.

Power architecture further separates the two. The Arc G3 draws 25 W and requires no external power, fitting its integrated role. The RTX 5070 draws 250 W and needs a 16-pin connector plus a 600 W PSU recommendation. The 10x TDP difference is consistent with the performance differential implied by the benchmark scores, though the Arc G3's lack of measured data prevents a direct efficiency comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 wins in every category with recorded data. Its benchmark suite covers DX12 via 3DMark Steel Nomad, compute via Geekbench OpenCL and Passmark GPU Compute, and graphics APIs via Geekbench Vulkan and Passmark DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 tests. The scores are strong across the board, with the Vulkan result of 178,923 leading all recorded tests. The RTX 5070 also wins on raw specification counts: 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 48 ray tracing cores, 192 tensor cores, and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. For a discrete desktop GPU, this configuration targets high-resolution gaming, ray tracing workloads, and compute-heavy applications.

The Arc G3 wins only in efficiency-oriented specifications. Its 25 W TDP is far below the RTX 5070's 250 W, and its integrated nature requires no power connectors, no slot width, and no separate PSU rating. It also uses a more advanced process node at 3 nm compared to 5 nm, which suggests better power-per-transistor characteristics, though no transistor count is available to quantify this. The Arc G3's system-shared memory approach eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM, which suits a portable or ultra-low-power device. Its 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate are low in absolute terms but consistent with an integrated GPU's role.

For use cases, the RTX 5070 is the clear pick for any desktop build requiring verified performance, dedicated VRAM, and PCIe connectivity. The Arc G3 is appropriate for a system where the GPU is fused into the platform, power draw must stay minimal, and the user accepts that performance data is not yet recorded. The database shows no benchmark wins for the Arc G3, so any claim of its real-world capability would lack supporting evidence. The RTX 5070, meanwhile, has a full set of measurements that establish it as a solid mid-range performer, sitting at the 82nd percentile and trading positions within 2% of its nearest rivals.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
G3
RTX 5070
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,280
6,144 +380.0%
Shaders
1,280
6,144 +380.0%
TMUs
40
192 +380.0%
ROPs
20
80 +300.0%
SM Count
—
48
Execution Units
10
—
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
2325 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2512 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
12,288
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
192 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
201.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
482.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.144 TFLOPS
30.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
768.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
482.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
30.87 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
10
48 +380.0%
Tensor Cores
—
192
XMX Cores
80
—
Power
TDP
25 W
250 W
TDP (W)
25
250 +900.0%
Suggested PSU
—
600 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Panther Lake
GB205
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake)
GeForce 50
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
31,100 million
Die Size
unknown
263 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
—
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
245 mm 9.6 inches
Height
—
115 mm 4.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
549 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
—
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View Arc G3 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Details