Intel Arc G3 Extreme vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc G3 Extreme

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2500 MHz
TDP 80 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
7,025
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
221,768
passmark_directx_10
N/A
204
passmark_directx_11
N/A
320
passmark_directx_12
N/A
119
passmark_directx_9
N/A
397
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,336
passmark_g3d
N/A
33,360
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
19,255

Analysis: Intel Arc G3 Extreme vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

The Verdict

The database comparison between the Intel Arc G3 Extreme and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is defined by a massive performance gulf. The Arc G3 Extreme is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, by contrast, is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board with recorded scores across nine different tests, an average benchmark score of 31,532, and a percentile ranking of 76. The data shows that the NVIDIA part is the only viable option for any measured graphics workload, while the Intel part serves a fundamentally different role as a portable device component. Any user requiring discrete performance, dedicated VRAM, or workstation-class compute should select the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. The Arc G3 Extreme, with its system-shared memory and IGP bus interface, is strictly a low-power integrated solution for devices where a separate graphics card is not an option.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc G3 Extreme is built on Intel's own 3 nm process node and uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, implemented in the Panther Lake chip. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. Its base clock is 300 MHz, with a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The chip contains 1,536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 24 raster operation pipelines, and 12 ray tracing cores. The database lists no dedicated tensor cores for this part. Its pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s, its texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s, and its FP32 throughput is 7.680 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 15.36 TFLOPS, achieved at a 2:1 ratio. The power draw is 80 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is designed to be integrated into a portable device. It has no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and uses a system-shared memory configuration where the memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. Memory clocks are also system shared. Display outputs are portable device dependent. The chip supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its production status is Active, with a release date of May 31, 2026.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, using the GB203 chip and Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It belongs to the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. The die measures 378 mm² and contains 45,600 million transistors, for a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². Its base clock is 1635 MHz, with a boost clock of 2407 MHz. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. It ships with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 ray tracing cores, and 328 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 269.6 GPixel/s, texture rate is 789.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 50.53 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is also 50.53 TFLOPS, but at a 1:1 ratio, meaning there is no FP16 acceleration advantage. The board is dual-slot, 267 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 40 mm wide. It draws 200 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and provides four DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. It supports the same API set as the Intel part: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its production status is Active, with a release date of March 17, 2025. Its predecessor is listed as Workstation Ada.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries between the two GPUs, and the Arc G3 Extreme has no individual benchmark scores in any test. Therefore, all quantitative comparisons in this section rely on the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's own recorded results. The Arc G3 Extreme's average benchmark score is zero, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's average is 31,532. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 7,025. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 221,768. Passmark results for the NVIDIA part include a G3D score of 33,360, a GPU compute score of 19,255, and a G2D score of 1,336. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 204 in DirectX 10, 320 in DirectX 11, 119 in DirectX 12, and 397 in DirectX 9. The Arc G3 Extreme has no comparable recorded figures, so its performance in these workloads cannot be quantified from the database. The only conclusion available from the recorded data is that the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell delivers measurable performance across synthetic, compute, and legacy API tests, while the Intel part does not appear in any benchmark result.

The nearest rivals to the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell provide context for its positioning. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX has an average score of 31,676, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's average. The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 31,894, which is 1.1% higher. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q scores 31,220, which is 1% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 scores 31,206, also 1% lower. These deltas place the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell in a tight competitive band, within roughly one percentage point of all four nearest rivals. The Arc G3 Extreme has no nearest rivals listed in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary performance difference between the Intel Arc G3 Extreme and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has an average benchmark score of 31,532 and a percentile rank of 76, while the Arc G3 Extreme has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50. The NVIDIA part is a discrete GPU with 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, whereas the Intel part is an IGP with 7.680 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc G3 Extreme uses system-shared memory, so its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a 200 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The Arc G3 Extreme has an 80 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU because it is designed as an integrated processor.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 10,496 shading units and 82 ray tracing cores. The Arc G3 Extreme has 1,536 shading units and 12 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part also includes 328 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists none.

Q: How does the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: Its average score of 31,532 is 0.5% below the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31,676), 1.1% below the Intel Arc Pro A30M (31,894), 1% above the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q (31,220), and 1% above the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31,206).

Q: What are the process nodes and die sizes?

A: The Arc G3 Extreme uses Intel's 3 nm process. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 378 mm² and 45,600 million transistors.

Q: What display outputs does each GPU provide?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell provides four DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The Arc G3 Extreme's display outputs are portable device dependent, since it is an integrated part.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell wins every category where recorded data exists. Its 50.53 TFLOPS of FP32 compute dwarfs the Arc G3 Extreme's 7.680 TFLOPS, indicating a roughly 6.6x raw throughput advantage based on the recorded figures. Pixel rate favors the NVIDIA part at 269.6 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate favors it at 789.5 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA GPU's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provides dedicated, high-speed storage for large datasets, whereas the Intel GPU's system-shared memory offers no dedicated bandwidth figure and is entirely host dependent. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell also includes 328 tensor cores, which the Intel part lacks entirely, making the NVIDIA card the only one of the two with any recorded tensor processing capability.

The Arc G3 Extreme wins on integration and power envelope. Its 80 W TDP is 120 W lower than the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 200 W. It is an IGP with no power connectors and no slot width beyond the integrated form factor, which makes it suitable for portable devices where a dual-slot, 267 mm long, 111 mm tall, 40 mm wide add-in board cannot fit. The NVIDIA card requires a 550 W suggested PSU and a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, while the Intel part uses the IGP bus interface and draws power from the host system. The Arc G3 Extreme is also fabricated on a smaller 3 nm process compared to the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell's 5 nm process, although the database does not provide transistor counts or die size for the Intel part to quantify the density difference.

For workstation-class rendering, AI inference, or any workload that uses tensor cores, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the only choice in this comparison. Its FP16 throughput of 50.53 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio means it does not accelerate FP16 relative to FP32, but the absolute figure is still far above the Intel GPU's 15.36 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. For legacy API compatibility, the Passmark DirectX 9 score of 397 and DirectX 11 score of 320 show the NVIDIA GPU handles older workloads, although no comparable data exists for the Intel part. The Arc G3 Extreme's role is limited to portable devices where an integrated GPU is the only option, and its performance in that role cannot be assessed from the database because it has no recorded benchmark scores. The data confirms that the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell delivers measurable, competitive performance in its class, while the Arc G3 Extreme remains a specification-only entry with no benchmark presence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
G3 Extreme
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,536
10,496 +583.3%
Shaders
1,536
10,496 +583.3%
TMUs
48
328 +583.3%
ROPs
24
112 +366.7%
SM Count
—
82
Execution Units
12
—
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
2500 MHz
2407 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
32,768
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
60.00 GPixel/s
269.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
120.0 GTexel/s
789.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.680 TFLOPS
50.53 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
960.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
789.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
15.36 TFLOPS (2:1)
50.53 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
82 +583.3%
Tensor Cores
—
328
XMX Cores
96
—
Power
TDP
80 W
200 W
TDP (W)
80
200 +150.0%
Suggested PSU
—
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Panther Lake
GB203
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake)
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,600 million
Die Size
unknown
378 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
—
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
—
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
—
Workstation Ada
View Arc G3 Extreme Details View RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Details