Intel Arc B770 vs NVIDIA H20 NVL16 Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc B770

CORE STATE BMG-G31
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 225 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe2-HPG
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

H20 NVL16

CORE STATE GH100
VRAM 96 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1980 MHz
TDP 400 W
BUS WIDTH 6144 bit
ARCHITECTURE Hopper
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

Analysis: Intel Arc B770 vs NVIDIA H20 NVL16

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the Intel Arc B770 and NVIDIA H20 NVL16 as two entirely different tools, despite both being placed at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc B770 is a consumer-facing graphics card built for rendering and interactive workloads, while the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 is a server accelerator with no display outputs, designed for compute-heavy environments. The data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark wins for either product, so the choice rests entirely on which class of work the user is performing. For gaming, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, or any task requiring a display connection, the Intel Arc B770 is the only viable option from this pair. For massive memory capacity, high-bandwidth compute, or Tensor Core acceleration, the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 is the clear selection. The Arc B770 offers a familiar dual-slot PCIe card with standard power connectors, while the H20 NVL16 is an SXM module requiring a server chassis and an 800 W suggested PSU. The data indicates these products do not compete in the same market segment; they serve different buyers entirely.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage (Arc 7) generation and the Alchemist predecessor line. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 368 mm². The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 uses the GH100 chip on the Hopper architecture, part of the Server Hopper (Hxx) generation with the Server Ada predecessor. It is also fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the die measures 814 mm² and contains 80,000 million transistors, yielding a density of 98.3M / mm². The Arc B770's transistor count is listed as unknown, which limits direct density comparisons. The H20 NVL16 uses HBM3 memory with a 6144-bit bus, while the Arc B770 uses GDDR6 with a 256-bit bus. The Intel card incorporates 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, whereas the H20 NVL16 lists no ray tracing cores but provides 312 Tensor Cores. The Arc B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the H20 NVL16 reports N/A for all three APIs, indicating it is not intended for graphics rendering in the traditional sense. The H20 NVL16 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, one generation newer than the Arc B770's PCIe 4.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B770 wins in any scenario that requires a physical display output. It provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 connections, while the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has no outputs at all. The Arc B770 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, making it the only choice for gaming or graphics applications that rely on these APIs. Its dual-slot form factor and 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors fit standard desktop power supplies, with a suggested 550 W PSU. The H20 NVL16 wins in memory capacity and bandwidth: 96 GB of HBM3 compared to 16 GB of GDDR6, and 4.03 TB/s bandwidth versus 512.0 GB/s. The H20 NVL16 also delivers higher raw compute in FP32 (39.54 TFLOPS vs 19.66 TFLOPS) and FP16 (79.07 TFLOPS vs 39.32 TFLOPS, both at 2:1 ratio). The Tensor Cores on the H20 NVL16 provide acceleration for AI and deep learning workloads, a feature entirely absent from the Arc B770. The H20 NVL16's SXM module form factor and 400 W TDP indicate a server environment, whereas the Arc B770's 225 W TDP fits a desktop tower. The production status of the H20 NVL16 is listed as Active, while the Arc B770 does not report a production status, suggesting the NVIDIA part is currently available in the market.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: The Intel Arc B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 reports N/A for all three graphics APIs.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has 96 GB of HBM3 memory on a 6144-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has Tensor Cores?

A: The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has 312 Tensor Cores. The Intel Arc B770 does not list any Tensor Cores in its specifications.

Q: Can the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 connect to a display?

A: No, the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has no display outputs. The Intel Arc B770 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Q: What is the power requirement for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W and requires a suggested 550 W PSU. The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 has a TDP of 400 W and requires a suggested 800 W PSU.

Q: Which GPU is newer in release date?

A: The NVIDIA H20 NVL16 was released on 2025-09-01, while the Intel Arc B770 has a release date of 2025-12-31. The H20 NVL16 also lists a successor, Server Blackwell, while the Arc B770 does not list a successor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc B770 and the NVIDIA H20 NVL16, and neither product has individual benchmark scores or nearest rivals listed. The wins count for both products is zero, meaning the data does not provide a direct performance comparison. What the data does show is a dramatic difference in memory architecture: the H20 NVL16's 4.03 TB/s bandwidth is approximately 7.9 times the Arc B770's 512.0 GB/s. The compute throughput also favors the NVIDIA part by a factor of roughly 2.0 in FP32 (39.54 TFLOPS vs 19.66 TFLOPS) and 2.0 in FP16 (79.07 TFLOPS vs 39.32 TFLOPS). The pixel rate tells the opposite story, with the Arc B770 delivering 307.2 GPixel/s compared to the H20 NVL16's 47.52 GPixel/s, a 6.5 times advantage for the Intel card. The texture rates are much closer: 614.4 GTexel/s for the Arc B770 and 617.8 GTexel/s for the H20 NVL16, a difference of less than one percent. The shading unit count favors the NVIDIA part at 9984 versus 4096, and the TMU count is 312 versus 256. The ROP count is dramatically different, with 128 on the Arc B770 and only 24 on the H20 NVL16, reinforcing that the Intel card is optimized for pixel output while the NVIDIA card is compute-focused.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip on Xe2-HPG architecture, while the NVIDIA H20 NVL16 uses the GH100 chip on Hopper architecture. The process node is the same at 5 nm from TSMC, but the die size differs significantly: 368 mm² for the Arc B770 and 814 mm² for the H20 NVL16. The H20 NVL16 lists 80,000 million transistors with a density of 98.3M / mm², while the Arc B770's transistor count is unknown. Clock speeds show the Arc B770 running at 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, while the H20 NVL16 runs at 1830 MHz base and 1980 MHz boost. Memory speed also differs: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective for the Intel card versus 1313 MHz 5.3 Gbps effective for the NVIDIA card. The memory type, size, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the H20 NVL16: HBM3, 96 GB, 6144-bit, and 4.03 TB/s versus GDDR6, 16 GB, 256-bit, and 512.0 GB/s. The shading units are 4096 on the Arc B770 and 9984 on the H20 NVL16. TMUs are 256 versus 312. ROPs are 128 versus 24. The Arc B770 has 32 ray tracing cores, while the H20 NVL16 lists none. The H20 NVL16 has 312 Tensor Cores, while the Arc B770 lists none. FP32 compute is 19.66 TFLOPS versus 39.54 TFLOPS, and FP16 compute is 39.32 TFLOPS versus 79.07 TFLOPS (both 2:1). TDP is 225 W versus 400 W. The Arc B770 is a dual-slot card with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors and a 550 W suggested PSU, while the H20 NVL16 is an SXM module with no listed power connectors and an 800 W suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Intel card and PCIe 5.0 x16 for the NVIDIA card. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 for the Arc B770, and none for the H20 NVL16. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 for the Intel card, with N/A for all three on the NVIDIA card. The H20 NVL16 has an Active production status, while the Arc B770 does not report one. Release dates are 2025-12-31 for the Arc B770 and 2025-09-01 for the H20 NVL16. The predecessors are Alchemist for the Intel card and Server Ada for the NVIDIA card, and the H20 NVL16 lists Server Blackwell as its successor while the Arc B770 lists none.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
B770
H20 NVL16
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,096
9,984 +143.8%
Shaders
4,096
9,984 +143.8%
TMUs
256
312 +21.9%
ROPs
128
24 -81.3%
SM Count
78
Execution Units
32
Clocks
Base Clock
2100 MHz
1830 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1980 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1313 MHz 5.3 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
96 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
98,304 +500.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM3
Memory Bus
256 bit
6144 bit
Bandwidth
512.0 GB/s
4.03 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
60 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
47.52 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
617.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS
39.54 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS (1:8)
19.77 TFLOPS (1:2)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
39.32 TFLOPS (2:1)
79.07 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
Tensor Cores
312
XMX Cores
256
Power
TDP
225 W
400 W
TDP (W)
225
400 +77.8%
Suggested PSU
550 W
800 W
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe2-HPG
Hopper
GPU Name
BMG-G31
GH100
Generation
Battlemage (Arc 7)
Server Hopper (Hxx)
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
80,000 million
Die Size
368 mm²
814 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
98.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
9.0
Shader Model
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
SXM Module
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Predecessor
Alchemist
Server Ada
Successor
Server Blackwell
View Arc B770 Details View H20 NVL16 Details