Intel Arc B770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual matchup. The Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark scores in the database, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a full suite of ten recorded tests. The result is a one-sided comparison where the NVIDIA card stands as the only quantified performer. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER posts an average benchmark score of 31087, placing it in the 76th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 with an average score of 31206, which is 0.4% higher, and the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q at 31220, also 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532, a 1.4% advantage, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX reaches 31676, which is 1.9% ahead.

Breaking down the individual tests for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, the strongest result appears in Passmark G3D with a score of 31811. The Geekbench OpenCL test shows 199267, while the Geekbench Vulkan test records 53683. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the score is 5569. The Passmark suite shows a spread across API generations: DirectX 9 scores 360, DirectX 11 scores 278, DirectX 10 scores 181, and DirectX 12 scores 119. The Passmark GPU Compute test records 18372, and the Passmark G2D test shows 1225.

The Intel Arc B770, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark results and an average score of zero. Its percentile versus all GPUs sits at 50, which is the median mark, but this is not supported by any test data. The database shows zero wins for the Intel card and zero wins for the NVIDIA card, reflecting the absence of direct head-to-head measurements. The data indicates the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a validated performer, while the Arc B770 remains an unquantified entry in the database. The gap in measured performance is total, but it is a gap of missing information rather than a proven deficit in the Intel hardware.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage generation under the Arc 7 series. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 368 mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture, part of the GeForce 40-series. It is also built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but its die size is 379 mm², slightly larger. The NVIDIA chip has 45,900 million transistors with a density of 121.1M per mm², while the Intel transistor count is listed as unknown.

The shading resources differ sharply. The Intel card has 4096 shading units, while the NVIDIA card has 8448, more than double. Texture mapping units stand at 256 for Intel and 264 for NVIDIA, a modest difference. Raster output units differ in the opposite direction: Intel has 128 ROPs while NVIDIA has 96. Ray tracing cores are 32 on the Intel card versus 66 on the NVIDIA card. Tensor cores are absent from the Intel listing, while NVIDIA has 264. The FP32 compute rates reflect the shading unit disparity: Intel delivers 19.66 TFLOPS, NVIDIA delivers 44.10 TFLOPS. FP16 rates are 39.32 TFLOPS on Intel with a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA achieves 44.10 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Memory architecture shows both cards with 16 GB capacity and a 256 bit bus width. The Intel card uses GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card uses GDDR6X memory with a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s, a 31% advantage. Clock speeds also favor NVIDIA: base clocks are 2100 MHz for Intel versus 2340 MHz for NVIDIA, and boost clocks are 2400 MHz versus 2610 MHz. The memory clocks are recorded as 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective for Intel, and 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective for NVIDIA. The pixel rate is higher on Intel at 307.2 GPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s, while the texture rate is higher on NVIDIA at 689.0 GTexel/s versus 614.4 GTexel/s.

Power draw and physical design differ as well. The Intel card has a TDP of 225 W with a dual-slot cooler and power connectors of 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 285 W with a triple-slot cooler and a single 16-pin connector. The suggested PSU is 550 W for Intel and 600 W for NVIDIA. The Intel card is listed without dimensions, while the NVIDIA card measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. Display outputs are similar in count: both have one HDMI and three DisplayPort connections, but the Intel card uses HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1, while the NVIDIA card uses HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status for NVIDIA is end-of-life, while Intel has no status listed. The NVIDIA release date is January 2024, and the Intel release date is December 2025.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear choice for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, but with an important caveat: the Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark measurements in the database. Based strictly on the available facts, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only card with proven performance. Its average benchmark score of 31087 places it in the 76th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 1.9% of its score, indicating a competitive position near the top of the recorded field. The Intel card sits at the 50th percentile with a zero average score, which in the database means it has not been tested.

The architectural data reinforces the NVIDIA advantage where it matters for raw compute. The FP32 throughput of 44.10 TFLOPS on NVIDIA is more than double the Intel figure of 19.66 TFLOPS. The shading unit count of 8448 versus 4096 supports this gap. Memory bandwidth is also higher on NVIDIA at 672.3 GB/s versus 512.0 GB/s, which typically benefits high-resolution texturing and ray tracing workloads. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER carries more ray tracing cores at 66 versus 32, and it has 264 tensor cores while the Intel card lists none.

For a user selecting between these two cards from the data alone, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option with verified results. The Intel Arc B770 may offer competitive specifications in some areas, such as higher pixel rate and a lower TDP, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm its real-world performance. The NVIDIA card also has a documented launch MSRP of 799 USD. The Intel card has no MSRP listed. The verdict is straightforward: the data favors NVIDIA, and any consideration of the Intel card would require additional measurements that are not present in the database.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Intel Arc B770 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER:

• Chip: BMG-G31 versus AD103
• Architecture: Xe2-HPG versus Ada Lovelace
• Generation: Battlemage (Arc 7) versus GeForce 40
• Transistors: unknown versus 45,900 million
• Die Size: 368 mm² versus 379 mm²
• Transistor Density: not listed versus 121.1M per mm²
• Base Clock: 2100 MHz versus 2340 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2400 MHz versus 2610 MHz
• Memory Clock: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective versus 1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
• Memory Type: GDDR6 versus GDDR6X
• Bandwidth: 512.0 GB/s versus 672.3 GB/s
• Shading Units: 4096 versus 8448
• TMUs: 256 versus 264
• ROPs: 128 versus 96
• RT Cores: 32 versus 66
• Tensor Cores: not listed versus 264
• Pixel Rate: 307.2 GPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 614.4 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 19.66 TFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS
• FP16: 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 225 W versus 285 W
• Slot Width: Dual-slot versus Triple-slot
• Power Connectors: 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: 550 W versus 600 W
• Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Dimensions: not listed versus 310 mm length, 140 mm height, 61 mm width
• Production Status: not listed versus End-of-life
• Release Date: December 2025 versus January 2024
• Predecessor: Alchemist versus GeForce 30
• Successor: not listed versus GeForce 50
• Launch MSRP: not listed versus 799 USD

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087. The Intel Arc B770 has an average score of zero because it has no recorded benchmarks.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The nearest rivals are all slightly higher or lower within 1.9%. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 is 0.4% higher, the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q is 0.4% higher, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 1.4% higher, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX is 1.9% higher.

Q: What is the difference in FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Arc B770 delivers 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers 44.10 TFLOPS, more than double.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA card has 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth with GDDR6X memory. The Intel card has 512.0 GB/s with GDDR6 memory.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel card has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 285 W and a suggested PSU of 600 W.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every category where measured data exists. Its average benchmark score of 31087 versus zero for the Intel card is the dominant fact. The NVIDIA card also leads in FP32 throughput, FP16 throughput, memory bandwidth, shading units, texture mapping units, ray tracing cores, and tensor cores. It has a higher boost clock and a higher base clock. The texture rate is higher at 689.0 GTexel/s versus 614.4 GTexel/s. These wins cover compute-heavy workloads, ray tracing, and high-bandwidth memory access.

The Intel Arc B770 wins in a smaller set of specification comparisons. It has a higher pixel rate at 307.2 GPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s. It has more ROPs at 128 versus 96. It draws less power at 225 W versus 285 W, and it has a lower suggested PSU at 550 W versus 600 W. It uses a dual-slot cooler instead of a triple-slot design, which indicates a more compact physical footprint, though its dimensions are not listed. The Intel card also supports DisplayPort 2.1, a newer standard than the DisplayPort 1.4a on the NVIDIA card.

In the absence of Intel benchmark scores, the use-case split is uneven. The NVIDIA card is the only option for users who rely on recorded performance data. It suits scenarios that demand high compute throughput, such as rendering, simulation, and heavy gaming at high resolutions where memory bandwidth matters. The Intel card, based on specifications alone, may appeal to users prioritizing lower power draw and a smaller cooler, but the database offers no evidence of its actual performance. The data shows the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER as the verified performer, and the Arc B770 as an unmeasured alternative.