Intel Arc B770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc B770 against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The Intel Arc B770 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, by contrast, has a substantial set of recorded measurements across multiple test suites.

The RTX 4070 Ti delivers an average benchmark score of 44795, placing it at the 84th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of results: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152 (0.8% above), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384 (1.3% above), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075 (1.6% below), and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592 (1.7% above). This indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti sits within a competitive band where small percentage differences separate adjacent products.

Breaking down the RTX 4070 Ti's individual results, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows a score of 5024. In synthetic compute workloads, Geekbench OpenCL records 176953 and Geekbench Vulkan records 213808. Passmark results include a G3D score of 31624, a GPU compute score of 18396, and a G2D score of 1200. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 352 for DirectX 9, 288 for DirectX 11, 187 for DirectX 10, and 116 for DirectX 12.

The Intel Arc B770 presents no comparable figures. Its average benchmark score of zero means the database cannot establish any performance relationship, margin, or ranking relative to the RTX 4070 Ti. The absence of measurements for the B770 is a material gap: the recorded data allows no statement about which GPU wins any specific test, and no delta percentage can be computed between the two cards.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different architectures and chip designs. The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G31 chip, part of the Battlemage (Arc 7) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, belonging to the GeForce 40 series. Both are manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

The die sizes differ measurably. The Intel chip has a die size of 368 mm², while the NVIDIA chip is smaller at 294 mm². Transistor counts are known only for the NVIDIA part: 35,800 million transistors with a density of 121.8M per mm². The Intel transistor count is recorded as unknown, though its larger die area suggests a different integration approach.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The Arc B770 carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, producing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti carries 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, producing 504.2 GB/s. The Intel card has a slightly higher memory bandwidth (512.0 versus 504.2 GB/s) and a larger frame buffer. Memory clock speeds are recorded as 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for Intel and 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA.

Shader resources differ substantially. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The Arc B770 has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. NVIDIA leads in shading units by a wide margin, while Intel leads in both TMUs and ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also differs: the RTX 4070 Ti has 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, while the Arc B770 has 32 RT cores and no tensor core count listed.

Clock speeds favor NVIDIA. The RTX 4070 Ti runs at a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The Arc B770 runs at 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. The NVIDIA card also has a higher FP32 throughput at 40.09 TFLOPS versus 19.66 TFLOPS for Intel. FP16 performance shows a different relationship: NVIDIA delivers 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while Intel delivers 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), meaning Intel's FP16 figure is achieved through a packed execution path.

Pixel and texture rates favor different cards. The Arc B770 achieves 307.2 GPixel/s and 614.4 GTexel/s, while the RTX 4070 Ti achieves 208.8 GPixel/s and 626.4 GTexel/s. Intel leads in pixel fill rate, NVIDIA leads slightly in texture fill rate.

Power and connectivity also differ. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W and uses one 6-pin plus one 8-pin connector. The RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 W with a suggested PSU of 600 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards with PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces. Display outputs differ: Intel offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while NVIDIA offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Release timing is also distinct. The RTX 4070 Ti was released on January 3, 2023, with a production status of end-of-life. The Arc B770's recorded release date is January 1, 2026, with no production status listed. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 799 USD; the Intel card has no recorded launch MSRP. The NVIDIA card's predecessor is GeForce 30 and its successor is GeForce 50. The Intel card's predecessor is Alchemist with no successor listed.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one clear conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has extensive benchmark measurements while the Intel Arc B770 has none. The RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score of 44795 and 84th percentile ranking place it among the higher-performing GPUs in the database, with nearest rival scores ranging from 1.7% above to 1.6% below. The Arc B770's average benchmark score of zero means it cannot be ranked, compared, or verified against any other product.

From the specification data alone, the cards target different trade-offs. The Arc B770 offers more memory (16 GB versus 12 GB), slightly higher bandwidth (512.0 versus 504.2 GB/s), more ROPs (128 versus 80), and a larger die (368 mm² versus 294 mm²). The RTX 4070 Ti offers more shading units (7680 versus 4096), more RT cores (60 versus 32), more tensor cores (240 versus none listed), higher clocks (2610 versus 2400 MHz boost), and more than double the FP32 throughput (40.09 versus 19.66 TFLOPS).

For a user selecting strictly from the database, the RTX 4070 Ti is the only card with demonstrated performance. The Arc B770's specifications suggest strengths in memory capacity and pixel throughput, but the absence of benchmark results prevents any quantitative validation. The RTX 4070 Ti also has a defined competitive position: its nearest rivals sit within 1.7% of its average score, confirming that its performance class is well established in the database. The Arc B770 has no such positioning.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc B770 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Arc B770 has an empty benchmarks list, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50. It has no recorded results in any test.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795 and sits at the 84th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152 (0.8% above), the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384 (1.3% above), the NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44075 (1.6% below), and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45592 (1.7% above).

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card leads in both capacity and bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32, more than double the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS.

Q: Are there differences in display outputs?

A: Yes. The Arc B770 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The RTX 4070 Ti provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Arc B770 advantages from recorded specifications: The B770 has a larger memory capacity at 16 GB versus 12 GB, and higher memory bandwidth at 512.0 GB/s versus 504.2 GB/s. It also has more ROPs (128 versus 80) and a higher pixel rate (307.2 GPixel/s versus 208.8 GPixel/s). The B770 has more TMUs (256 versus 240) and a higher texture rate in some interpretations, though the RTX 4070 Ti's recorded texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s is slightly above the B770's 614.4 GTexel/s. The B770 uses newer DisplayPort 2.1 outputs versus DisplayPort 1.4a on the NVIDIA card. The B770 has a lower TDP of 225 W versus 285 W and a lower suggested PSU of 550 W versus 600 W. Its power connectors (1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin) may be more compatible with existing power supplies than the RTX 4070 Ti's single 16-pin connector. The B770's FP16 throughput of 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) is close to the RTX 4070 Ti's 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1), and the B770's FP32 figure of 19.66 TFLOPS is exactly half of the NVIDIA card's 40.09 TFLOPS.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti advantages from recorded specifications and measurements: The RTX 4070 Ti has a decisive advantage in shading units (7680 versus 4096), RT cores (60 versus 32), and tensor cores (240 versus none listed for Intel). Its boost clock of 2610 MHz exceeds the B770's 2400 MHz, and its base clock of 2310 MHz exceeds the B770's 2100 MHz. FP32 compute of 40.09 TFLOPS is roughly double the B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. The RTX 4070 Ti has an established benchmark record: an average score of 44795, an 84th percentile ranking, and specific results including 5024 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 176953 in Geekbench OpenCL, 213808 in Geekbench Vulkan, 31624 in Passmark G3D, and 18396 in Passmark GPU compute. The RTX 4070 Ti has a smaller die (294 mm² versus 368 mm²) and a known transistor count of 35,800 million with a density of 121.8M per mm², whereas the B770's transistor count is unknown. The NVIDIA card is also smaller physically, with recorded dimensions of 285 mm length, 112 mm height, and 42 mm width; the B770 has no recorded physical dimensions.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B770 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Generation | Battlemage (Arc 7) | GeForce 40 |

| Chip | BMG-G31 | AD104 |

| Process node | 5 nm (TSMC) | 5 nm (TSMC) |

| Die size | 368 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Transistors | Unknown | 35,800 million |

| Base clock | 2100 MHz | 2310 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) |

| Memory size | 16 GB GDDR6 | 12 GB GDDR6X |

| Memory bus | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading units | 4096 | 7680 |

| TMUs | 256 | 240 |

| ROPs | 128 | 80 |

| RT cores | 32 | 60 |

| Tensor cores | Not listed | 240 |

| FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel rate | 307.2 GPixel/s | 208.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 614.4 GTexel/s | 626.4 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 225 W | 285 W |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 600 W |

| Power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Release date | 2025-12-31 (recorded) | 2023-01-02 (recorded) |

| Production status | Not listed | End-of-life |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 799 USD |

| Predecessor | Alchemist | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | Not listed | GeForce 50 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 44795 |

| Percentile | 50 | 84 |