Intel Arc B770 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Arc B770 and Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 serve entirely different purposes, and the recorded data makes that split unambiguous. The Arc B770 is a consumer-oriented graphics card built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with a 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooling, and display outputs. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 is a compute-focused accelerator with a 450 W TDP, OAM Module form factor, no display outputs, and a 96 GB HBM2e memory pool. The database shows both parts at the 50th percentile versus all GPUs, but their design goals diverge completely: one is for rendering to a screen, the other for massive parallel compute workloads where memory capacity and bandwidth dominate.

The Arc B770 is the choice for anyone needing a conventional graphics card. It offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, 4096 shading units, 32 ray tracing cores, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4. Its 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are respectable for a consumer part, and its 2100 MHz base clock with a 2400 MHz boost clock keeps it responsive in typical workloads. The card includes 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, making it ready for multi-monitor setups.

The Data Center GPU Max 1350 is the pick for compute-heavy environments where the absence of display outputs is irrelevant. It delivers 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 44.44 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 1:1 ratio, which is more than double the Arc B770's FP32 throughput. Its 96 GB of HBM2e memory on an 8192-bit bus provides 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth, nearly five times the Arc B770's 512.0 GB/s. The 14336 shading units and 112 ray tracing cores further cement its role as a data center workhorse. The production status is listed as active, while the Arc B770 has no production status recorded, suggesting the Max 1350 is currently in the market while the B770's availability is unclear.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc B770 wins in scenarios that require a standard graphics card experience. It has a higher base clock (2100 MHz vs 750 MHz) and boost clock (2400 MHz vs 1550 MHz), which benefits latency-sensitive workloads. Its 128 ROPs provide rasterization throughput, and its pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s is a functional metric, whereas the Data Center GPU Max 1350 records 0 MPixel/s, indicating it is not designed for pixel output. The B770 also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Max 1350 has no Vulkan support listed. The B770's 16 GB GDDR6 memory is standard for a gaming or workstation card, and its 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors fit typical desktop power supplies, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

The Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins decisively in compute throughput and memory capacity. Its FP32 performance of 44.44 TFLOPS is 2.26 times the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 44.44 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio contrasts with the B770's 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning the Max 1350 maintains full FP16 throughput without relying on packed math. The texture rate of 1,388.8 GTexel/s is more than double the B770's 614.4 GTexel/s. The 96 GB memory capacity allows datasets that would never fit in 16 GB, and the 2.46 TB/s bandwidth eliminates memory bottlenecks for bandwidth-hungry kernels. The Max 1350 also uses PCIe 5.0 x16 compared to the B770's PCIe 4.0 x16, doubling the host interface bandwidth for data transfers.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Arc B770 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G31 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses Generation 12.5 architecture with the Ponte Vecchio chip, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The process node difference is significant: 5 nm versus 10 nm, which affects transistor density and power efficiency, though the B770's transistor count is listed as unknown.

The die size difference is stark. The Max 1350's Ponte Vecchio die measures 1280 mm² with 100,000 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 78.1M per mm². The Arc B770's die is 368 mm² with an unknown transistor count. This makes the Max 1350 one of the largest chips in the database, with nearly 3.5 times the die area of the B770.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The B770 uses GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, while the Max 1350 uses HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus. The bus width difference of 32 times explains the bandwidth gap: 2.46 TB/s versus 512.0 GB/s. The Max 1350 also has 896 texture mapping units versus the B770's 256, and 14336 shading units versus 4096, showing a 3.5 times increase in shader count. However, the Max 1350 has 0 ROPs, confirming it is not built for final pixel output.

The B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Max 1350 only supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6. The B770 lists Vulkan 1.4 support, while the Max 1350 has no Vulkan entry. The B770 includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the Max 1350 includes 112, a 3.5 times advantage in RT hardware, though the Max 1350's lack of display output suggests those cores serve compute tasks rather than real-time rendering.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth from its 96 GB HBM2e memory on an 8192-bit bus. The Intel Arc B770 has 512.0 GB/s from 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. The Max 1350 provides roughly 4.8 times the bandwidth.

Q: Can the Data Center GPU Max 1350 output video?

A: No. The database lists its display outputs as "No outputs" and its pixel rate as 0 MPixel/s. It also has 0 ROPs. The Arc B770, by contrast, has 128 ROPs, a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s, and outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Q: How do their FP32 compute performances compare?

A: The Data Center GPU Max 1350 achieves 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32, which is 2.26 times the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. In FP16, the Max 1350 also hits 44.44 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the B770 reaches 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Q: What power delivery do the two cards require?

A: The Arc B770 has a 225 W TDP and uses 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 has a 450 W TDP, no power connector information, a suggested PSU of 850 W, and uses an OAM Module slot width.

Q: Which GPU supports the newer PCIe standard?

A: The Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc B770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This gives the Max 1350 twice the host interface bandwidth for data transfer.

Q: What are their release dates?

A: The Data Center GPU Max 1350 was released on January 9, 2023, and its production status is active. The Arc B770 has a release date of December 31, 2025, with no production status recorded. The Max 1350's successor is listed as H3C Graphics, while the B770's predecessor is Alchemist.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs, with zero wins recorded for either side. However, the specification data allows for clear performance projections. The most lopsided advantage belongs to the Data Center GPU Max 1350 in memory bandwidth: 2.46 TB/s versus 512.0 GB/s, a 4.8 times difference. This alone determines that memory-bound compute workloads will favor the Max 1350 overwhelmingly.

In raw compute, the Max 1350's 44.44 TFLOPS of FP32 is 2.26 times the B770's 19.66 TFLOPS. The texture rate follows a similar pattern: 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 614.4 GTexel/s, a 2.26 times advantage. The shading unit count of 14336 versus 4096 is a 3.5 times difference, and the ray tracing core count of 112 versus 32 is also 3.5 times higher.

The Arc B770 holds advantages in clock speeds and rasterization. Its 2100 MHz base clock is 2.8 times the Max 1350's 750 MHz, and its 2400 MHz boost clock is 1.55 times the Max 1350's 1550 MHz. The B770's 128 ROPs and 307.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are functional metrics, while the Max 1350 records 0 ROPs and 0 MPixel/s. The B770 also supports newer graphics APIs: DirectX 12 Ultimate versus DirectX 12 (12_1), and Vulkan 1.4 versus no Vulkan support.

The power efficiency comparison favors the B770 on paper. The B770 delivers 19.66 TFLOPS at 225 W, while the Max 1350 delivers 44.44 TFLOPS at 450 W. Per watt, the B770 produces 0.087 TFLOPS per watt versus the Max 1350's 0.099 TFLOPS per watt, a modest efficiency edge for the data center part despite its much larger die and older process node.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with a 368 mm² die. The Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip on Intel's 10 nm process with a 1280 mm² die and 100,000 million transistors. The B770's transistor count is unknown, while the Max 1350 lists a density of 78.1M transistors per mm².

Clock speeds differ substantially. The B770 runs at 2100 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. The Max 1350 runs at 750 MHz base and 1550 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the B770 uses 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the Max 1350 uses 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective, though the Max 1350's vastly wider bus compensates.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The B770 has 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Max 1350 has 96 GB HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth. The B770 has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The Max 1350 has 14336 shading units, 896 TMUs, and 0 ROPs. Ray tracing cores number 32 on the B770 versus 112 on the Max 1350.

The B770's TDP is 225 W with a dual-slot form factor and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors. The Max 1350's TDP is 450 W with an OAM Module form factor and no listed power connectors. Suggested PSU ratings are 550 W for the B770 and 850 W for the Max 1350. The B770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Max 1350 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 on the B770, with no outputs on the Max 1350. API support shows DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 on the B770, versus DirectX 12 (12_1) and no Vulkan on the Max 1350, with OpenGL 4.6 on both.