Intel Arc B390 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc B390

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2500 MHz
TDP 80 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,482
6,604
geekbench_opencl
N/A
212,363
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
225,122
passmark_directx_10
N/A
192
passmark_directx_11
N/A
300
passmark_directx_12
N/A
127
passmark_directx_9
N/A
351
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,332
passmark_g3d
N/A
32,974
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,203

Analysis: Intel Arc B390 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

The Verdict

The database comparison between the Intel Arc B390 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is decisively one-sided. The RTX 5070 Ti wins the only shared benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), by a margin of 77.6%, scoring 6604 against the Arc B390’s 1482. The RTX 5070 Ti sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the Arc B390 lands in the 9th percentile. The RTX 5070 Ti is for desktop gamers and compute users who need discrete performance, while the Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) intended for portable devices where a dedicated card is not an option. The data shows no scenario where the Intel part wins a head-to-head test, so the choice is dictated by platform and power constraints, not by performance parity.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B390 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, and belongs to the GeForce 50-series. The RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The Arc B390’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The RTX 5070 Ti is a discrete card with a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, dual-slot cooling, and a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Arc B390 is an IGP with no bus interface beyond the integrated graphics path, no power connectors, and a slot width listed as IGP. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Arc B390 has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 RT cores, with tensor cores listed as null. The RTX 5070 Ti’s FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, and its FP16 rate is also 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1). The Arc B390 delivers 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 and 15.36 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Pixel rate for the NVIDIA part is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s for Intel; texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 Ti’s memory is 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Arc B390 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and a system shared bus width. The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP, while the Arc B390 has an 80 W TDP. The NVIDIA card’s display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the Arc B390’s outputs are portable device dependent.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score in the shared test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), while the Intel Arc B390 scores 1482, a 77.6% difference in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: How do the two parts compare in overall GPU percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, whereas the Arc B390 is in the 9th percentile, indicating the NVIDIA card outperforms a much larger share of the database.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B390 uses system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Are there differences in power requirements?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 700 W, with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Arc B390 has an 80 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU listed.

Q: What are the process node and foundry for each chip?

A: The Intel Arc B390 is built on a 3 nm process at Intel’s foundry. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Which GPU is newer in release date?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti was released on 2025-02-19, while the Arc B390 was released on 2026-01-26, making the Intel part the later release.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The Arc B390 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, while the RTX 5070 Ti uses GB203 with Blackwell 2.0. The process node is 3 nm for Intel and 5 nm for NVIDIA. The RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die with a density of 120.6M per mm²; the Arc B390’s transistor count and die size are unknown. Base clocks are 300 MHz for the Arc B390 and 2295 MHz for the RTX 5070 Ti. Boost clocks are 2500 MHz and 2452 MHz, respectively. The Intel part’s memory clock is listed as system shared, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Memory size is system shared for Intel versus 16 GB for NVIDIA. Memory type is system shared versus GDDR7. Bus width is system shared versus 256 bit. Bandwidth is system dependent versus 896.0 GB/s. Shading units are 1536 versus 8960, TMUs are 48 versus 280, ROPs are 24 versus 96, RT cores are 12 versus 70, and tensor cores are null versus 280. Pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 is 7.680 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 is 15.36 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1). TDP is 80 W versus 300 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. The suggested PSU is null versus 700 W. Bus interface is IGP versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Dimensions: the RTX 5070 Ti is 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide; the Arc B390 has no listed dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the Arc B390 has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark in the database is 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604, and the Intel Arc B390 scores 1482. The delta is -77.6%, meaning the Intel part trails by that percentage. This single result drives the wins tally: 0 wins for the Arc B390 and 1 win for the RTX 5070 Ti.

The RTX 5070 Ti’s average benchmark score is 49957, which places it near the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, -0.1% difference) and ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (49737, 0.4%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, 3.1%). Its closest rival, the RX Vega 64, is essentially at parity. The Arc B390’s average benchmark score is 1482, which is 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463), 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1460), 2.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446), and 2.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443). The Intel part’s nearest rivals are all low-end legacy GPUs, which confirms its position at the bottom of the performance distribution.

Beyond the shared test, the RTX 5070 Ti has additional recorded benchmarks: Geekbench OpenCL at 212363, Geekbench Vulkan at 225122, Passmark DirectX 10 at 192, DirectX 11 at 300, DirectX 12 at 127, DirectX 9 at 351, G2D at 1332, G3D at 32974, and GPU Compute at 20203. The Arc B390 has no other benchmark entries in the database. The RTX 5070 Ti’s G3D score of 32974 and GPU Compute score of 20203 indicate substantial compute throughput, while its Vulkan score of 225122 is higher than its OpenCL score of 212363, suggesting strong cross-API performance.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measurable category from the recorded data. It wins the 3DMark Steel Nomad test by 77.6%, which is the only direct comparison available. Its average benchmark score is 49957 versus 1482 for the Arc B390, a gap of roughly 34 times. The RTX 5070 Ti’s percentile rank of 86 versus 9 means it outperforms nearly the entire database, whereas the Arc B390 outperforms only a small fraction. The NVIDIA card also has a full set of compute and graphics benchmarks, while the Intel part has just a single entry.

The Arc B390’s wins are limited to its form factor and power envelope. It is an IGP with an 80 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU, making it suitable for portable devices where the RTX 5070 Ti’s 300 W TDP, 700 W suggested PSU, and dual-slot cooler cannot apply. The Intel part’s base clock of 300 MHz and boost of 2500 MHz show a wide dynamic range, but the performance ceiling is low. The RTX 5070 Ti’s base clock of 2295 MHz is higher than the Arc B390’s boost clock by 157 MHz, and its boost of 2452 MHz further extends the lead.

For users with a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot and a 700 W PSU, the RTX 5070 Ti delivers 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32. For users constrained to integrated graphics, the Arc B390 provides 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 and shared memory, but it cannot match any discrete GPU in the RTX 5070 Ti’s class. The database shows 0 wins for the Arc B390 and 1 win for the RTX 5070 Ti, making the NVIDIA part the only choice for performance-sensitive workloads. The Intel part remains viable only where its IGP form factor and low TDP are mandatory requirements.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
B390
RTX 5070 Ti
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,536
8,960 +483.3%
Shaders
1,536
8,960 +483.3%
TMUs
48
280 +483.3%
ROPs
24
96 +300.0%
SM Count
70
Execution Units
12
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
2500 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
60.00 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
120.0 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.680 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
960.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
15.36 TFLOPS (2:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
70 +483.3%
Tensor Cores
280
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
80 W
300 W
TDP (W)
80
300 +275.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Panther Lake
GB203
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake)
GeForce 50
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,600 million
Die Size
unknown
378 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
749 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 40
Successor
GeForce 60
View Arc B390 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Details