Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core specifications of the Intel Arc B370?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses the Panther Lake chip on a 3 nm process from Intel, featuring the Xe3-LPG architecture. It has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. Its base clock is 300 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and it delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Q: What are the core specifications of the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip on a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring the Xe2-HPG architecture. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores. Its base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and it delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W and requires no power connectors, making it suitable for integrated graphics platforms. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a TDP of 400 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 800 W.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a percentile ranking of 5 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a percentile ranking of 50, though its average benchmark score is 0 due to no recorded benchmark data.

Q: What display outputs does each card provide?

A: The Intel Arc B370's display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary based on the host system. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

The Verdict

The data presents two fundamentally different products from Intel. The Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor built for mobile platforms, drawing only 25 W and sharing system memory. Its benchmark score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, indicating entry-level performance suitable for basic tasks. In contrast, the Arc Pro B60 Dual is a professional dual-slot add-in card with 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 400 W TDP, and a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. Its 50th percentile ranking, while based on no recorded benchmark scores in this database, positions it as a mid-range performer by classification.

For users seeking a low-power integrated solution for portable devices, the Arc B370 is the appropriate choice. Its 25 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it ideal for compact systems where energy efficiency is paramount. The Arc Pro B60 Dual, with its 24 GB VRAM, 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and professional display outputs, targets workstation applications requiring substantial memory capacity and multi-display support. The Arc Pro B60 Dual also carries a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the two GPUs are not available in the database. The Arc B370 has a single recorded benchmark result: 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores.

However, the Arc B370's nearest rivals provide context for its performance level. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher than the Arc B370. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192, 0.7% higher. The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower than the Arc B370. These results indicate the Arc B370 sits in a narrow performance band around the 1184 score mark.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual's theoretical specifications suggest substantially higher compute capability. Its FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS is exactly double the Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is four times the Arc B370's 48.00 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is four times the Arc B370's 96.00 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the Arc Pro B60 Dual should deliver significantly higher rendering throughput, though no direct benchmark verification exists in the database.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measurable specification. The Arc B370 uses a 3 nm Intel process with the Panther Lake chip, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual uses a 5 nm TSMC process with the BMG-G21 chip. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual has a base clock of 2000 MHz. Both share the same 2400 MHz boost clock.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The Arc B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources scale substantially between the two. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has 2560 shading units versus 1280 on the Arc B370, 160 TMUs versus 40, 80 ROPs versus 20, and 20 RT cores versus 10. The Arc Pro B60 Dual's FP32 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS is double the Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS is double the Arc B370's 12.29 TFLOPS.

Power and physical specifications also diverge sharply. The Arc B370 has a 25 W TDP, is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors, and uses an IGP bus interface. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP, is a dual-slot card measuring 300 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm, requires a single 16-pin power connector, suggests an 800 W PSU, and uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the Arc B370's outputs are portable device dependent. The Arc Pro B60 Dual has a known transistor count of 19,600 million on a 272 mm² die with a density of 72.1M per mm². The Arc B370's transistor count and die size are unknown. The Arc Pro B60 Dual was released on 2025-09-04, while the Arc B370 was released on 2026-01-26.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between the two GPUs is significant. The Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation for Panther Lake. The Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the Xe2-HPG architecture from the Battlemage Pro Series generation.

The Xe3-LPG architecture in the Arc B370 is designed for low-power integrated graphics, as evidenced by its 25 W TDP and 300 MHz base clock. This architecture prioritizes energy efficiency over raw throughput. The Xe2-HPG architecture in the Arc Pro B60 Dual is designed for high-performance professional graphics, with a 400 W TDP and 2000 MHz base clock indicating a focus on maximum compute capability.

Both GPUs support the same API feature set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means both support modern graphics APIs despite their different performance classes.

The manufacturing processes reflect different priorities. The Arc B370 uses Intel's 3 nm process, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual uses TSMC's 5 nm process. The Arc Pro B60 Dual's die is 272 mm² and contains 19,600 million transistors. The Arc B370's die size and transistor count are not recorded.

The 10 RT cores in the Arc B370 versus 20 RT cores in the Arc Pro B60 Dual indicate the professional card has double the ray tracing capability. Neither card lists tensor cores in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Arc B370 wins in power efficiency and integration flexibility. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Arc Pro B60 Dual's 400 W TDP. The Arc B370 requires no power connectors, no dedicated cooling solution, and no extra PSU capacity. Its IGP bus interface means it can be deployed in compact portable devices where space is at a premium. The Arc B370 also wins on release recency, launching on 2026-01-26 compared to the Arc Pro B60 Dual's 2025-09-04 release date.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in every compute and memory category. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provides 24 GB more dedicated memory than the Arc B370's shared system memory. The Arc Pro B60 Dual's 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs are all exactly double the Arc B370's counts. Its 20 RT cores double the Arc B370's ray tracing capability.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance is double the Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS is likewise double. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s are both four times the Arc B370's respective rates.

In terms of market positioning, the Arc B370 occupies the integrated mobile graphics segment with a 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The Arc Pro B60 Dual occupies the professional workstation segment with a 50th percentile ranking, though its average benchmark score of 0 reflects the absence of recorded benchmark data.

For connectivity, the Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, enabling multi-monitor professional setups. The Arc B370's display outputs depend entirely on the host portable device.

The Arc Pro B60 Dual's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface provides a modern high-bandwidth connection to the host system, while the Arc B370's IGP interface is inherently limited by the host platform's memory architecture.

Users requiring dedicated VRAM for large datasets, professional rendering workloads, or multi-display configurations would select the Arc Pro B60 Dual. Users prioritizing minimal power draw, compact form factor, and integration into portable systems would select the Arc B370. The two products do not compete in the same market segment, and the database shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between them.