Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc B570 Comparison
Intel Arc B370
Arc B570
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Arc B570
The Verdict
The recorded data presents a clear hierarchy between these two Intel Arc parts. The Intel Arc B370, an integrated graphics processor built on the Panther Lake chip, delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. The Intel Arc B570, a discrete add-in board from the Battlemage generation, scores 2649 in the same test. This represents a 55.3% advantage for the B570, and it wins the only direct head-to-head benchmark in the database.
The Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile of all GPUs, placing it near the bottom of the performance distribution. Its nearest rivals in the database are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, 0.2% ahead), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, 0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, 0.7% ahead), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1168, 1.4% behind). The B370 effectively trades blows with these legacy parts, with deltas under 2% in either direction.
The Arc B570 performs at the 65th percentile, a much stronger position. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.1% behind), Intel Arc A750 (20582, 0.1% ahead), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, 0.4% behind), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, 0.5% ahead). The B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it squarely in this competitive cluster.
The data indicates the B570 is the performance pick for any user who needs a discrete graphics card capable of modern DX12 workloads. The B370 is an integrated solution intended for portable devices, and its benchmark position reflects that role. Users requiring sustained 3D performance should select the B570; users whose primary constraint is an integrated form factor with no expansion slot will find the B370's capabilities in line with the data.
Where Each One Wins
The B570 wins the only available head-to-head benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 2649 versus 1184 for the B370. This is a 55.3% margin, a decisive advantage. The B570's victory extends across all other recorded benchmark categories, though the B370 has no entries for those tests.
The B370's sole recorded benchmark is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its score of 1184 places it within a narrow band of legacy discrete and mobile GPUs. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192. The AMD FirePro M2000 trails at 1168. The B370 is therefore competitive with a specific class of older parts, but it has no presence in the other benchmark suites.
The B570 has a much broader benchmark footprint. It records scores across 3DMark, Geekbench OpenCL, Geekbench Vulkan, and multiple Passmark tests. In Geekbench OpenCL it scores 83514, in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 96844. Passmark results include DirectX 9 at 164, DirectX 10 at 65, DirectX 11 at 118, DirectX 12 at 72, G2D at 661, G3D at 14195, and GPU Compute at 7281. These results indicate a wide-ranging capability profile, with the G3D score being the most substantial.
The data shows no benchmark category where the B370 wins. The B570 holds a single victory in the head-to-head comparison, and the B370 has zero wins across all recorded tests. For compute-heavy workloads such as OpenCL or Vulkan, the B570's results are orders of magnitude higher, though no direct B370 comparison exists in those tests.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different Intel architectures and fabrication processes. The B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. The chip is named Panther Lake, and it belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The B370 is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP slot width, a bus interface of IGP, and no power connectors. Its base clock is 300 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent.
The B570 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on a 5 nm process node, fabricated by TSMC. The chip is named BMG-G21, belonging to the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation. This is a discrete dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface and a single 8-pin power connector. The B570 has 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². Its base and boost clocks are both 2500 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
The B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 raster output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. The B570 has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 18 RT cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither lists tensor core counts. The B370's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, while the B570 achieves 200.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS for the B370 and 11.52 TFLOPS for the B570; FP16 is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) and 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) respectively.
The B570 has a 150 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The B370 has a 25 W TDP. The B570 measures 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The B370 has no listed dimensions because it is an IGP. The B570's display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the B370's outputs are portable device dependent. The B570 launched on 2025-01-15 with a launch MSRP of 219 USD; the B370 launched on 2026-01-26 with no launch MSRP recorded.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has a higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?
A: The Intel Arc B570 scores 2649, which is 55.3% higher than the Intel Arc B370's score of 1184.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The B370 is within 1.4% of all four nearest rivals. It trails the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 by 0.2%, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M by 0.7%, while leading the AMD FirePro M2000 by 1.4%.
Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Arc B570?
A: The B570 sits at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it within 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc A750, NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X.
Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?
A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?
A: The B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The B570 uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?
A: The B370 has a 25 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The B570 has a 150 W TDP, uses a single 8-pin connector, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains one direct comparison between the two parts: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Intel Arc B570 scores 2649, while the Intel Arc B370 scores 1184. The delta is 55.3% in favor of the B570, which is a substantial margin for a single benchmark. This test exercises DX12 rendering workloads and is a strong indicator of modern game performance.
The B370's score of 1184 falls into a narrow performance band. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, a 0.2% difference. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 and AMD Radeon HD 7650M are 0.5% and 0.7% ahead respectively. The AMD FirePro M2000 sits 1.4% behind. These deltas are small, indicating that the B370's performance is well characterized by the database and that it competes with a specific class of older hardware.
The B570's 3DMark score of 2649 places it in a different competitive tier. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, averages 20534, which is 0.1% behind the B570's average of 20556. The Intel Arc A750 averages 20582, 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% behind at 20480, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% ahead at 20662. The B570's average score sits nearly equidistant between these rivals, with the largest gap being only 0.5%.
Beyond the head-to-head test, the B570 has additional benchmark results that the B370 lacks entirely. The B570's Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 and OpenCL score of 83514 indicate strong compute performance. Its Passmark G3D score of 14195 is the highest among its Passmark entries, while G2D scores 661. The DirectX 9 score of 164 is the highest among its legacy DirectX tests, with DirectX 11 at 118, DirectX 12 at 72, and DirectX 10 at 65. GPU Compute scores 7281.
The B370 has no entries for these tests, so no direct comparison is possible. The data shows the B570 winning the single recorded head-to-head test, and the B370 winning none of the recorded head-to-head benchmarks. The B570's broader benchmark presence also indicates a more versatile profile, though the B370's integrated nature means it will appear in systems where no discrete option exists.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification. The process nodes are different: the B370 uses Intel's 3 nm process, while the B570 uses TSMC's 5 nm process. The B370 is based on the Xe3-LPG architecture and the Panther Lake chip, while the B570 uses Xe2-HPG on the BMG-G21 chip. The B370 is from the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, the B570 from the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation.
Clock speeds differ substantially. The B370 has a 300 MHz base clock and a 2400 MHz boost clock. The B570 has a 2500 MHz base clock and a 2500 MHz boost clock, meaning it runs at a constant frequency. Memory clocking also differs: the B370 uses system shared memory, while the B570 uses dedicated GDDR6 at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.
Memory capacity and bandwidth are entirely different. The B370 has no dedicated memory, relying on system shared resources with system dependent bandwidth. The B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s. The B570's transistor count is 19,600 million on a 272 mm² die, with a density of 72.1M per mm²; the B370's transistor count and die size are unknown.
Compute resources are higher on the B570. It has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 18 RT cores. The B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. Pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s for the B570 versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the B370. Texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1).
Physical and power specifications diverge as well. The B370 is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and no dimensions listed. The B570 is a dual-slot card measuring 272 mm by 115 mm, using a single 8-pin power connector, with a 150 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The B370 has only a 25 W TDP. The B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the B370 uses an IGP bus. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the B370, while the B570 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. Both share the same API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The B570 has a recorded launch MSRP of 219 USD; the B370 has no launch MSRP.