Intel Arc A580 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc A580 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. This is primarily due to the Lisuan Tech LX PRO having no recorded benchmark scores in any test suite, including 3DMark Steel Nomad, Geekbench OpenCL, or Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile ranking against all GPUs sits at 50.

The Intel Arc A580, by contrast, has three recorded benchmark scores. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it delivers 2229 points. Geekbench OpenCL shows 91657 points, and Geekbench Vulkan shows 79381 points. Its average benchmark score across the recorded tests is 57756, which places it in the 87th percentile against all GPUs tracked in the database.

Because the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded scores, the database cannot compute a delta percentage between the two cards. The nearest rivals for the Intel Arc A580 provide useful context for its standing. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085 points, which is 0.6% lower than the Arc A580's average. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE averages 57367 points, 0.7% lower. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58239 points, 0.8% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392 points, 1.1% lower. The Arc A580 sits within a tight band of these rivals, with all four falling within roughly one percentage point of its average score.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no nearest rivals listed in the database, and no wins are recorded for either card in head-to-head testing. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. What can be compared are the theoretical specifications and the limited benchmark data available for the Arc A580.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A580 has clear, measured wins in any benchmark that produces a score. Its 87th percentile ranking and average score of 57756 demonstrate that it is a functional, competitive GPU against established rivals like the RX 5600 OEM and RX 6950 XT. The data shows the Arc A580 performs within a narrow margin of these cards, slightly ahead of some and slightly behind others. For any workload that relies on DX12, OpenCL, or Vulkan performance, the Arc A580 has recorded evidence of its capability.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO cannot claim any benchmark wins because the database contains no scores for it. Its specifications, however, indicate areas where it could theoretically excel. It has 6144 shading units, double the Arc A580's 3072. Its FP32 throughput is recorded at 24.58 TFLOPS, exactly double the Arc A580's 12.29 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS, also double the Arc A580's 24.58 TFLOPS. This suggests the LX PRO has significantly higher raw compute throughput on paper.

The LX PRO also offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, three times the Arc A580's 8 GB. This larger memory pool could benefit workloads with large datasets, such as high-resolution texture packs or certain compute tasks. However, the LX PRO's memory bandwidth is lower at 432.0 GB/s compared to the Arc A580's 512.0 GB/s, despite the LX PRO using faster memory at 18 Gbps effective versus 16 Gbps effective. The LX PRO's 192-bit bus width limits its bandwidth compared to the Arc A580's 256-bit bus.

For ray tracing, the Arc A580 has 24 dedicated RT cores. The LX PRO lists no RT cores in the database. This gives the Arc A580 a clear structural advantage for any ray-traced workload. The Arc A580 also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO lists Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The Verdict

Based strictly on recorded data, the Intel Arc A580 is the only card with measurable performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 57756 and 87th percentile ranking confirm it performs in line with established mid-range and older high-end GPUs. Users who need confirmed performance in DX12, OpenCL, or Vulkan applications should select the Arc A580.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark records, so the database cannot verify its real-world performance. Its specifications indicate higher raw compute (24.58 TFLOPS FP32) and more memory (24 GB), but without scores, these remain theoretical advantages. The lack of RT cores and lower memory bandwidth are notable weaknesses on paper. The LX PRO also lists Vulkan 1.3 support, one version behind the Arc A580's Vulkan 1.4.

The production status for both cards is Active. The Arc A580 was released on 2023-10-09, while the LX PRO has a recorded release date of 2026-03-16. The Arc A580 has a predecessor (Xe Graphics) and successor (Battlemage) listed, while the LX PRO has neither.

The choice depends on whether the user trusts recorded performance or unverified specifications. For confirmed performance, the Arc A580 is the only option with data. For theoretical compute capacity and memory size, the LX PRO appears stronger on paper, but those numbers carry no benchmark validation.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average benchmark score of 57756. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark results.

Q: How does the Arc A580 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 0.6% lower, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 0.7% lower, the Intel Arc A570M is 0.8% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 1.1% lower than the Arc A580's average score.

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc A580 and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units. The Intel Arc A580 has 3072 shading units.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each card?

A: The Intel Arc A580 ranks in the 87th percentile against all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO ranks in the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A580 uses the DG2-512 chip, built on the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation (Arc 5). It is manufactured by Intel on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 406 mm² and contains 21,700 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm².

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip, based on the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. Its manufacturer is listed as Unknown. It is also built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the database records no transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this chip.

The Arc A580 has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Both cards have identical pixel rates (192.0 GPixel/s) and texture rates (384.0 GTexel/s). The LX PRO doubles the FP32 and FP16 throughput of the Arc A580.

Ray tracing support differs significantly. The Arc A580 includes 24 RT cores. The LX PRO lists no RT cores. The Arc A580 also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The power delivery differs: the Arc A580 has a TDP of 175 W and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Display outputs differ as well. The Arc A580 provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Specification Differences

Memory configuration is a major differentiator. The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units double from 3072 on the Arc A580 to 6144 on the LX PRO. TMUs and ROPs are identical at 192 and 96, respectively. FP32 compute doubles from 12.29 TFLOPS to 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 compute doubles from 24.58 TFLOPS to 49.15 TFLOPS.

The Arc A580 has 24 RT cores; the LX PRO has none listed. The Arc A580 has a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base or boost clocks.

Power consumption increases from 175 W on the Arc A580 to 225 W on the LX PRO. The power connector changes from 2x 8-pin to 1x 16-pin. The suggested PSU rises from 450 W to 550 W.

The Arc A580 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ: the Arc A580 has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Physical dimensions are only recorded for the LX PRO: 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The Arc A580 has no dimensions listed. Both cards are dual-slot and use PCIe 4.0 x16.

The release dates differ: the Arc A580 was released on 2023-10-09, while the LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16. The Arc A580 lists a predecessor (Xe Graphics) and successor (Battlemage), while the LX PRO has neither.