GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6700M

CORE STATE Navi 22
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 135 W
BUS WIDTH 160 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A580

CORE STATE DG2-512
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 175 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
1,845
2,229
geekbench_metal
91,911
N/A
geekbench_opencl
77,666
91,657
geekbench_vulkan
90,816
79,381
passmark_directx_10
92
N/A
passmark_directx_11
129
N/A
passmark_directx_12
65
N/A
passmark_directx_9
155
N/A
passmark_g2d
555
N/A
passmark_g3d
13,536
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
5,191
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs Intel Arc A580

Reviewing the test data for RX 6700 from AMD and Intel Arc A580, a pattern of competitive capability appears. Not one graphics card excels consistently in most titles. This alternating of victories means inherent balance. Consumers confront a true dilemma with these options. Either GPUs offer strong rendering performance.

When frame rates is so matched, value and extras turn the main variables. Look at hardware RT support, DLSS/FSR implementation, energy efficiency, and ecosystem stability when deciding between RX 6700 from AMD and Intel Arc A580. All these factors should sway the scales. Think holistically. The broader picture matters.

Game performance results similarly reveal matched performance between RX 6700 from AMD and Intel Arc A580. Performance gaps typically fall inside margin of error. This marginal variations are hardly perceptible during actual gaming sessions. Each cards deliver responsive frame rates. Those who game should pick comfortably between both cards.

In conclusion, the evaluation between RX 6700 from AMD and Intel Arc A580 finishes in a near deadlock. Frame rate gaps are minimal and doubtful to change real-world scenarios. Concentrate your choice on availability, software options, and personal functionality requirements. Either are capable picks. The balance is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 6700M
A580
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
3,072 +33.3%
Shaders
2,304
3,072 +33.3%
TMUs
144
192 +33.3%
ROPs
64
96 +50.0%
Compute Units
36
Execution Units
384
Clocks
Base Clock
1489 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2000 MHz
Game Clock
2300 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
10 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
10,240
8,192 -20.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
160 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
320.0 GB/s
512.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
3 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
80 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
192.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
11.06 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
691.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
1.536 TFLOPS (1:8)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
22.12 TFLOPS (2:1)
24.58 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
36
24 -33.3%
XMX Cores
384
Power
TDP
135 W
175 W
TDP (W)
135
175 +29.6%
Suggested PSU
450 W
Power Connectors
None
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 22
DG2-512
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)
Alchemist (Arc 5)
Process Size
7 nm
6 nm
Transistors
17,200 million
21,700 million
Die Size
335 mm²
406 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
51.3M / mm²
53.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
Xe Graphics
Successor
Battlemage
View Radeon RX 6700M Details View Arc A580 Details