Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A380M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 96 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

CORE STATE GB206
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
N/A
122,238
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
116,960
passmark_directx_10
N/A
129
passmark_directx_11
N/A
192
passmark_directx_12
N/A
93
passmark_directx_9
N/A
214
passmark_g2d
N/A
896
passmark_g3d
N/A
20,355
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
8,279

Analysis: Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Arc A380M has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile carries a full set of scores across multiple test suites. This means the comparison is one-sided by definition, but the available data for the RTX 5070 Mobile still provides a clear picture of its performance tier.

The RTX 5070 Mobile scores 122,238 in Geekbench OpenCL and 116,960 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its Passmark G3D score is 20,355, with a Passmark GPU Compute score of 8,279. Legacy DirectX tests show 214 in DirectX 9, 192 in DirectX 11, 129 in DirectX 10, and 93 in DirectX 12. The G2D score is 896.

The average benchmark score for the RTX 5070 Mobile is 29,928. The database places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, which puts it well above the midpoint. Its nearest rivals in the database are all desktop-class cards. The RTX 5070 Mobile sits 0.1% behind the RTX 3070 Ti, 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti, 0.6% behind the RX 6800, and 1.7% behind the RX 6700. These deltas are small, meaning the mobile part lands in a tight performance band around those established desktop GPUs.

For the Arc A380M, the database lists zero benchmark scores, zero average score, and zero wins in any head-to-head comparison. The percentile ranking is 50, which is the midpoint of the distribution, but that ranking is not supported by any recorded measurements. There are no nearest rivals listed for the A380M, so the data offers no comparative anchor for it.

The head-to-head benchmark table is empty. No individual test results exist for the A380M, and the wins counter shows zero for both sides. The RTX 5070 Mobile has no recorded wins either, simply because there are no paired tests to produce them. The data does not allow a direct score-by-score comparison, but it does show that the RTX 5070 Mobile has a rich benchmark profile while the A380M has none.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A380M uses the DG2-128 chip built on Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation for Arc 3 Mobile. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm².

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile uses the GB206 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die packs 21,900 million transistors into 181 mm², for a density of 121.0 million per mm². That is over three times the transistor density of the Intel part.

The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4,608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 36 ray tracing cores, and 144 tensor cores. The Arc A380M has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part delivers 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 and the same 13.13 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part delivers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface and is an IGP form factor with no power connectors. The Arc A380M is an MXM Module with an MXM-A (3.1) bus interface. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent for both.

The RTX 5070 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W. The Arc A380M has a TDP of 35 W. The NVIDIA chip is physically larger, denser, and significantly more complex in its compute resources.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile averages 29,928 points. It is 0.1% behind the RTX 3070 Ti (29,945 average), 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti (29,783), 0.6% behind the RX 6800 (30,095), and 1.7% behind the RX 6700 (30,433). The differences are narrow, placing it in a tight cluster of desktop-class performance.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has a density of 121.0 million transistors per mm², while the Arc A380M has 45.9 million per mm². The NVIDIA chip also carries 21,900 million total transistors versus 7,200 million for Intel.

Q: Which GPU has the higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 384.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus. The Arc A380M has 186.0 GB/s from 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus. The NVIDIA part has roughly double the bandwidth.

Q: What are the compute throughput figures for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile delivers 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 and 13.13 TFLOPS FP16. The Arc A380M delivers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16. The NVIDIA part is about 3.2 times higher in FP32.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Mobile have tensor cores?

A: Yes, the RTX 5070 Mobile has 144 tensor cores. The Arc A380M lists no tensor cores at all.

Q: What is the pixel rate for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has a pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s. The Arc A380M has 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification category.

Process node: the Arc A380M uses 6 nm, the RTX 5070 Mobile uses 5 nm. Both are TSMC.

Transistors: 7,200 million for Intel, 21,900 million for NVIDIA. Die size: 157 mm² versus 181 mm². Transistor density: 45.9M / mm² versus 121.0M / mm².

Clocks: the Arc A380M has a base clock of 1550 MHz and boost of 2000 MHz. The RTX 5070 Mobile has a base of 907 MHz and boost of 1425 MHz. The Intel part has the higher clock speeds, but the NVIDIA part achieves far higher throughput through its wider execution resources. Memory clocks: 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) for Intel, 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA.

Memory: 6 GB GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus for Intel, 8 GB GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus for NVIDIA. Bandwidth: 186.0 GB/s versus 384.0 GB/s.

Compute units: 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 8 RT cores for Intel. 4,608 shading units, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, 144 tensor cores for NVIDIA.

Rates: Intel has 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s. NVIDIA has 68.40 GPixel/s and 205.2 GTexel/s.

FP32: 4.096 TFLOPS for Intel, 13.13 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16: 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel, 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1) for NVIDIA.

TDP: 35 W for Intel, 50 W for NVIDIA. Form factor: MXM Module for Intel, IGP for NVIDIA. Bus interface: MXM-A (3.1) versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Power connectors: none listed for Intel, none for NVIDIA.

Release date: January 23, 2023 for the Arc A380M, April 14, 2025 for the RTX 5070 Mobile. The NVIDIA part lists the GeForce 40 Mobile as its predecessor. The Intel part has no predecessor or successor listed.

Production status is Active for both.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Mobile wins on every measurable benchmark category in the database. It has recorded scores in Geekbench OpenCL, Geekbench Vulkan, and six Passmark tests, while the Arc A380M has no recorded scores at all. The NVIDIA part also wins on raw compute resources: more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, more ray tracing cores, and the only tensor cores in the comparison.

The RTX 5070 Mobile wins on memory bandwidth by a wide margin, 384.0 GB/s versus 186.0 GB/s. It also has more memory capacity at 8 GB versus 6 GB, and a newer memory type, GDDR7 versus GDDR6. Its FP32 throughput is 13.13 TFLOPS versus 4.096 TFLOPS, and its texture rate is 205.2 GTexel/s versus 128.0 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate is slightly higher, 68.40 GPixel/s versus 64.00 GPixel/s.

The Arc A380M wins on clock speed. Its base clock of 1550 MHz and boost clock of 2000 MHz are higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile's 907 MHz base and 1425 MHz boost. It also has a lower TDP, 35 W versus 50 W, which points to lower power draw on paper. Those are the only areas where the Intel part leads, and neither translates into a benchmark win in the database.

The RTX 5070 Mobile sits in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,928. The Arc A380M sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero. The database records no wins for either GPU in head-to-head testing, but the absence of any A380M benchmark data means its percentile ranking is not backed by measurements.

In practical terms, the RTX 5070 Mobile is the only one of the two with evidence of usable performance. The Arc A380M has no data indicating it can compete in any workload measured by the database.

The Verdict

The data supports only one choice for any workload that requires actual graphics or compute performance: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. It has a complete benchmark profile with strong scores across OpenCL, Vulkan, and Passmark tests. It ranks in the 75th percentile of all GPUs and lands within a narrow margin of established desktop cards like the RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 2080 Ti, RX 6800, and RX 6700. Those deltas range from 1.7% behind to 0.5% ahead, which places it in solid desktop-class territory despite being a mobile part.

The Intel Arc A380M has no benchmark scores in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is not supported by any recorded measurements. It has lower compute throughput, lower memory bandwidth, fewer execution units, and no tensor cores. Its only advantages are higher clock speeds and a lower TDP, but neither is validated by any performance test.

The RTX 5070 Mobile is the appropriate pick for anyone needing proven performance in a laptop form factor. The Arc A380M is a low-power mobile chip with no recorded performance evidence, so the database cannot confirm it for any specific use case. The verdict is straightforward: the RTX 5070 Mobile is the only part here with data showing it can handle demanding graphics workloads.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A380M
RTX 5070 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
4,608 +350.0%
Shaders
1,024
4,608 +350.0%
TMUs
64
144 +125.0%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
SM Count
36
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 24 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
6 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
6,144
8,192 +33.3%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
96 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
186.0 GB/s
384.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
32 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
68.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
205.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS
13.13 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,024.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
205.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.192 TFLOPS (2:1)
13.13 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
36 +350.0%
Tensor Cores
144
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
50 W
TDP (W)
35
50 +42.9%
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
DG2-128
GB206
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
21,900 million
Die Size
157 mm²
181 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
121.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.6
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
MXM Module
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 40 Mobile
View Arc A380M Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Details