Intel Arc A380E x2 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct benchmark scores for either the Intel Arc A380E x2 or the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries show an average benchmark score of zero, and the head-to-head benchmark comparison list is empty. Consequently, there are no measured wins for either product in the database. The percentile versus all GPUs is identical for both at 50, indicating that without actual workload results, neither part can be ranked above the other in any compute or graphics test. The absence of scores means that any performance assertions must be derived strictly from the architectural specifications and raw throughput figures listed in the database, not from empirical test results.

The most significant measurable difference in compute capability is the FP32 throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is recorded at 24.58 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc A380E x2 delivers 4.096 TFLOPS. This represents a 500% advantage for the Lisuan part in single-precision floating-point operations. In FP16, the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS, compared to 8.192 TFLOPS for the Intel card, again a six-fold difference. Texture fill rate follows a similar pattern: the LX PRO produces 384.0 GTexel/s versus 128.0 GTexel/s for the Intel part, which is exactly three times higher. Pixel throughput also favors the Lisuan card at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 64.00 GPixel/s, a threefold margin. These figures, while not derived from benchmark runs, indicate a substantial raw compute gap that would likely translate into large performance differences in rendering and compute workloads.

Memory bandwidth shows a clear separation as well. The LX PRO records 432.0 GB/s, while the Intel Arc A380E x2 provides 186.0 GB/s. The Lisuan card also carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, compared to 6 GB on a 96-bit bus for Intel. The effective memory clock for the LX PRO is 18 Gbps, versus 15.5 Gbps for the Intel part. The combination of a wider bus, faster memory clock, and quadruple the capacity gives the LX PRO a decisive bandwidth advantage that would matter in high-resolution textures, large datasets, and memory-intensive workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc A380E x2 uses the DG2-128 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture, placed in the 7G100 generation. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, so the manufacturing node is identical. Intel lists 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan part does not disclose transistor count, die size, or density in the database, so a direct comparison of die efficiency is not possible.

Shader resources differ sharply. The Intel Arc A380E x2 contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. That is six times the shading units and three times the TMUs and ROPs. Ray tracing cores are present on the Intel part, with 8 RT cores listed, while the Lisuan card has no recorded RT core count. Neither card lists tensor cores. The API support also diverges: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Intel card supports Vulkan 1.4 while the Lisuan card lists Vulkan 1.3.

Power and physical specifications indicate different design targets. The Intel Arc A380E x2 has a TDP of 130 W and uses a single 6-pin power connector, with a suggested 300 W power supply. It is a single-slot card measuring 265 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a suggested 550 W power supply. It occupies a dual-slot design at 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The Intel card is therefore more compact and lower-power, while the Lisuan card consumes substantially more power and takes up more physical space.

Display output configurations also differ. The Intel Arc A380E x2 provides 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which is an unusual configuration suited to multi-display or embedded uses. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a more conventional arrangement. The bus interface differs as well: Intel uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while Lisuan uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving the latter twice the host interface bandwidth. Production status and release timing are also distinct. The Intel part is marked end-of-life with a release date of 2024-03-31, while the Lisuan part is active with a release date of 2026-03-16. Intel lists its predecessor as Xe Graphics and its successor as Battlemage, while the Lisuan card has no predecessor or successor recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is exactly six times the 4.096 TFLOPS of the Intel Arc A380E x2. The FP16 figures follow the same ratio: 49.15 TFLOPS versus 8.192 TFLOPS.

Q: How do the memory systems compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and an 18 Gbps effective memory clock. The Intel Arc A380E x2 has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 15.5 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: What are the physical and power differences?

A: The Intel Arc A380E x2 is a single-slot card with a 130 W TDP and a 6-pin power connector, requiring a 300 W power supply. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP and a 16-pin power connector, requiring a 550 W power supply.

Q: Does either card support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc A380E x2 lists 8 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no ray tracing core count recorded in the database.

Q: Which card has more display outputs?

A: The Intel Arc A380E x2 provides 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The Intel Arc A380E x2 is end-of-life and was released on 2024-03-31. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is active and was released on 2026-03-16.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two products into different performance classes. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO dominates in every raw throughput metric recorded: FP32 compute is 500% higher, FP16 is 500% higher, texture rate is 200% higher, pixel rate is 200% higher, and memory bandwidth is 132% higher. It also has six times the shading units, three times the TMUs and ROPs, and four times the memory capacity. For any workload that scales with shading units, memory bandwidth, or memory capacity, the Lisuan card is the superior choice based on the recorded specifications.

The Intel Arc A380E x2 counters with several advantages that matter in specific contexts. It is the only one of the two with ray tracing cores, listing 8 RT cores. It supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 API, while the Lisuan card is limited to Vulkan 1.3. It offers 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which doubles the output count of the Lisuan card and uses the newer DisplayPort standard. It also draws 95 W less power, requires a 250 W smaller power supply, and occupies a single slot instead of two. Its smaller physical footprint and lower power envelope make it suitable for constrained installations.

The production status also tilts the decision in one direction. The Intel card is end-of-life, while the Lisuan card is active. For new deployments, an active product with ongoing availability is preferable to a discontinued one. The Lisuan card also has a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface versus the Intel card's PCIe 4.0 x8, which halves the available host bandwidth on the Intel side.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in every major specification category except process node, foundry, memory type, and DirectX/OpenGL API support. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC for both. Both use GDDR6 memory. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Everything else differs.

The Intel Arc A380E x2 uses the DG2-128 chip with Xe-HPG architecture, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture. Intel has 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die; Lisuan does not disclose these figures. Intel runs a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz; Lisuan lists no core clocks. Intel's memory clock is 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective); Lisuan's is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Intel has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs; Lisuan has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Intel has 8 RT cores; Lisuan has none recorded. Intel produces 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s; Lisuan produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. Intel delivers 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16; Lisuan delivers 24.58 TFLOPS and 49.15 TFLOPS. Intel has 6 GB memory on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth; Lisuan has 24 GB on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s. Intel is 130 W with a single-slot design and 1x 6-pin connector; Lisuan is 225 W with a dual-slot design and 1x 16-pin connector. Intel suggests a 300 W power supply; Lisuan suggests 550 W. Intel uses PCIe 4.0 x8; Lisuan uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Intel has 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0; Lisuan has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Intel supports Vulkan 1.4; Lisuan supports Vulkan 1.3. Intel is end-of-life and released 2024-03-31; Lisuan is active and released 2026-03-16.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in all raw compute and memory metrics. FP32 and FP16 throughput are both six times higher than the Intel part. Texture and pixel fill rates are three times higher. Memory bandwidth is more than double, and memory capacity is quadruple. The 6144 shading units give it a massive advantage in parallel workloads. The 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth make it the better option for large frame buffers, high-resolution assets, and data-heavy compute tasks. The 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs support higher geometry throughput and better fill-rate-bound scenarios. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface doubles the host link bandwidth, which reduces transfer bottlenecks for data streaming.

The Intel Arc A380E x2 wins in power efficiency, physical footprint, display output count, ray tracing support, and API version. It draws 95 W less power and requires a power supply rated 250 W lower. Its single-slot design and smaller dimensions (265 mm versus 248 mm in length, but 20 mm versus 48 mm in width) allow installation in tighter chassis. The 8x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs exceed the Lisuan card's 4x DisplayPort 1.4a in both quantity and interface generation. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects that the Lisuan card lacks entirely. Vulkan 1.4 support is one API revision ahead of the Lisuan card's Vulkan 1.3. The 130 W TDP makes it suitable for systems with modest power budgets, while the 300 W suggested power supply indicates compatibility with a wider range of existing power supplies.

The production timeline also matters. The Intel card is end-of-life, so the Lisuan card has the advantage in availability and longevity. The Lisuan card's active status and later release date (2026-03-16 versus 2024-03-31) mean it is the more future-proof option from a procurement standpoint. Users needing multi-display configurations with the latest DisplayPort standard would prefer the Intel card, while users needing maximum compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth would select the Lisuan card.