GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
29,676
17,039
geekbench_vulkan
28,673
15,976

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA T400

Analyzing the test figures for the Arc A370M card from Intel and the NVIDIA T400 card from NVIDIA, an obvious picture emerges. the Arc A370M card from Intel consistently achieves superior scores in our analysis. This performance edge ranges from considerable to exceptional relative to the given benchmark. This reliability attests to fundamental design advantages. Users valuing visual performance might consider this.

In-game performance across various resolutions reliably benefit the Arc A370M card from Intel. Whether it's competitive games to demanding productions, the Arc A370M card from Intel preserves its superiority. This performance dependability across diverse scenarios proves underlying technical benefits. Gamers will count on capable performance regardless of title. This capability is outstanding.

the NVIDIA T400 card from NVIDIA struggles to match the Arc A370M card from Intel's raw performance. For cost-sensitive buyers, the NVIDIA T400 card from NVIDIA might still offer acceptable frame rates, though users demanding maximum results should lean toward the Arc A370M card from Intel. This frame rate difference is sufficiently substantial to ignore. Intensive workloads specifically reveal this margin. This investment provides benefits in capability.

For buyers making a acquisition decision, the Arc A370M card from Intel appears as the advised pick. Its reliable gaming superiority over the NVIDIA T400 card from NVIDIA makes it the wiser purchase for gaming-focused buyers. Evaluate your personal needs, but the benchmarks leads toward the Arc A370M card from Intel. Form an educated decision. This performance delta is significant and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A370M
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
384 -62.5%
Shaders
1,024
384 -62.5%
TMUs
64
24 -62.5%
ROPs
32
16 -50.0%
SM Count
6
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
2,048 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
30 W
TDP (W)
35
30 -14.3%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Turing
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU117
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
6 nm
12 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
4,700 million
Die Size
157 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View Arc A370M Details View T400 Details