GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz

TDP 35 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A4000

CORE STATE GA104

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1560 MHz

TDP 140 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

29,676

105,868

geekbench_vulkan

28,673

127,645

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

2,604

passmark_directx_10

N/A

126

passmark_directx_11

N/A

158

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

240

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,024

passmark_g3d

N/A

19,459

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

9,760

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

Analyzing the test data for NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU and Intel's Arc A370M graphics, a clear trend develops. NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU reliably achieves superior FPS in our benchmarking. The performance edge ranges from noticeable to exceptional according to the specific title. Such steadiness speaks to core engineering superiority. Buyers prioritizing rendering power would pay attention.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU jumps even more in front of Intel's Arc A370M graphics. Its specialized hardware handle complex global illumination rendering far more smoothly. Players seeking premium effects would definitely pick NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU. The RT superiority is significant. Next-gen titles more and more leverage real-time ray tracing effects.

To summarize, NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU delivers the more capable selection in this evaluation. The benchmark leads justify attention for anyone constructing a high-performance graphics PC. Even though Intel's Arc A370M graphics has its merits, the score numbers definitely supports NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU. Reach your choice with this in mind. The frame rate delta is significant enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A370M

RTX A4000

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

6,144 +500.0%

Shaders

1,024

6,144 +500.0%

TMUs

192 +200.0%

ROPs

96 +200.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

128

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1550 MHz

735 MHz

Boost Clock

2050 MHz

1560 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

16 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

16,384 +300.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

256 bit

Bandwidth

112.0 GB/s

448.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

65.60 GPixel/s

149.8 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

131.2 GTexel/s

299.5 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

4.198 TFLOPS

19.17 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)

299.5 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)

19.17 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

48 +500.0%

Tensor Cores

—

192

XMX Cores

128

—

Power

TDP

35 W

140 W

TDP (W)

140 +300.0%

Suggested PSU

—

300 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 6-pin

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA104

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

17,400 million

Die Size

157 mm²

392 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

44.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Length

—

241 mm 9.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

—

Quadro Turing

Successor

—

Workstation Ada

View Arc A370M Details View RTX A4000 Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A370M

RTX A4000

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons