GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2115 MHz
TDP 120 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
29,676
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
28,673
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,596

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Visual performance tests between the Intel Arc A370M and the RTX 5000 reveal a obvious champion. the Intel Arc A370M provides significantly better FPS over current games. This graphics memory superiority and design enhancements lead into clearly improved gaming results. Performance results validates this conclusion. Enthusiasts seeking high-end frame rates might factor this in.

the RTX 5000 faces challenges to compete with the Intel Arc A370M's absolute capability. In cost-sensitive users, the RTX 5000 may still provide acceptable capability, though users seeking premium performance should look toward the Intel Arc A370M. The performance gap is significantly substantial to overlook. Resource-hungry games especially reveal this disparity. The price gap delivers benefits in visual quality.

For hardware ray tracing, the Intel Arc A370M leaps significantly in front of the RTX 5000. Its RT units manage demanding reflection rendering considerably more efficiently. Gamers seeking cutting-edge visuals might definitely consider the Intel Arc A370M. This RT superiority is substantial. Modern titles continually use RT technology.

The bottom line: the Intel Arc A370M takes this showdown decisively. Consumers prioritizing gaming throughput might definitely favor the Intel Arc A370M over the RTX 5000. The score numbers validates this recommendation. The games can perform noticeably smoother. It's a clear winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A370M
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
9,728 +850.0%
Shaders
1,024
9,728 +850.0%
TMUs
64
304 +375.0%
ROPs
32
112 +250.0%
SM Count
76
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
2115 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
576.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
64 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
236.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
643.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
41.15 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
643.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
41.15 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
76 +850.0%
Tensor Cores
304
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
120 W
TDP (W)
35
120 +242.9%
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD103
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Ada-MW (x000A)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
45,900 million
Die Size
157 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Ampere-MW
Successor
Blackwell-MW
View Arc A370M Details View RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation Details